• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种二酰胺类农药滴灌和喷雾施药在玉米中的残留及分布规律和不同消费群体的膳食风险评估。

Residue and distribution of drip irrigation and spray application of two diamide pesticides in corn and dietary risk assessment for different consumer groups.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.

Key Laboratory of Natural Pesticide and Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Nov;102(14):6676-6686. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12035. Epub 2022 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1002/jsfa.12035
PMID:35608937
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the use of diamide insecticides on corn continues to increase, there is growing concern about their residue levels on corn and dietary risks to populations. In this study, the distribution, dispersion and transfer efficiency of two diamide insecticides (tetrachlorantraniliprole (TCAP) and cyantraniliprole (CNAP)) in different parts of corn and soil were investigated in a 1-year field trial in Guangzhou and Lanzhou using two different application methods - spray and drip irrigation, respectively - and the dietary risk of the insecticides to different consumer populations was assessed under the two application methods.

RESULTS

The results showed that drip irrigation had a longer persistence period than spraying, and there was a hysteresis in the absorption distribution of the agent in different parts of corn, which was gradually transferred to the leaves after absorption from the roots. The average TE (transfer efficiency) and TE were 0.230-0.261 and 1.749-1.851 for TCAP and 0.168-0.187 and 2.363-2.815 for CNAP, respectively. At corn harvest, both TCAP and CNAP were below detectable levels in soil and corn. For different consumer populations, hazard quotients ranged from 0.001 to 0.066 for TCAP and from 0.003 to 0.568 for CNAP - both well below 100%.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that TCAP and CNAP applied by spray or drip irrigation are safe for long-term risk of human intake and also provides guidance for the use of both insecticides in agricultural production to control corn pests, especially in arid and semi-arid areas. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.

摘要

背景

随着二酰胺类杀虫剂在玉米上的使用不断增加,人们越来越关注其在玉米上的残留水平以及对人群的膳食风险。本研究采用喷雾和滴灌两种不同施药方法,在广州和兰州进行了为期 1 年的田间试验,研究了两种二酰胺类杀虫剂(四氯虫酰胺(TCAP)和氰虫酰胺(CNAP))在玉米不同部位和土壤中的分布、扩散和转移效率,并评估了两种施药方法下不同消费人群的膳食风险。

结果

结果表明,滴灌的持效期长于喷雾,且药剂在玉米不同部位的吸收分布存在滞后现象,从根部吸收后逐渐转移到叶片。TCAP 和 CNAP 的平均 TE(转移效率)和 TE 分别为 0.230-0.261 和 1.749-1.851,0.168-0.187 和 2.363-2.815。玉米收获时,TCAP 和 CNAP 在土壤和玉米中的残留均低于检测限。对于不同的消费人群,TCAP 的危害商数范围为 0.001-0.066,CNAP 的危害商数范围为 0.003-0.568,均远低于 100%。

结论

本研究表明,喷雾或滴灌施用的 TCAP 和 CNAP 对长期人类摄入风险是安全的,也为这两种杀虫剂在农业生产中防治玉米害虫的使用提供了指导,特别是在干旱和半干旱地区。 © 2022 英国化学学会。

相似文献

1
Residue and distribution of drip irrigation and spray application of two diamide pesticides in corn and dietary risk assessment for different consumer groups.两种二酰胺类农药滴灌和喷雾施药在玉米中的残留及分布规律和不同消费群体的膳食风险评估。
J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Nov;102(14):6676-6686. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12035. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
2
Effect of dimethoate in controlling Monolepta hieroglyphica (Motschulsky) and its distribution in maize by drip irrigation.敌百虫灌根防治玉米弯刺黑蝽及其在玉米植株内的分布。
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Apr;76(4):1523-1530. doi: 10.1002/ps.5670. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
3
Efficacy of drip irrigation with thiamethoxam on control of Monolepta hieroglyphica, and uptake, translocation and dietary risk of thiamethoxam in maize.噻虫嗪滴灌防治玉米弯刺黑蝽及其在玉米中的吸收、迁移和膳食风险。
Pest Manag Sci. 2023 Dec;79(12):4931-4941. doi: 10.1002/ps.7695. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
4
Translocation of chlorantraniliprole and cyantraniliprole applied to corn as seed treatment and foliar spraying to control Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).氯虫苯甲酰胺和氰氟虫腙经玉米种子处理和叶面喷雾施用于防治草地贪夜蛾(鳞翅目:夜蛾科)的迁移。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 1;15(4):e0229151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229151. eCollection 2020.
5
Insecticidal potential and risk assessment of diamide pesticides against Spodoptera frugiperda in maize crops.甲酰胺类杀虫剂防治玉米田玉米螟的杀虫潜力及风险评估。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024 Sep 1;282:116682. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116682. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
6
Dissipation and transformation of the diamide insecticide cyantraniliprole in ornamental snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus).二酰胺类杀虫剂氰霜唑在观赏金鱼草(Antirrhinum majus)中的消解与转化。
Chemosphere. 2021 Oct;281:130753. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130753. Epub 2021 May 13.
7
Cyantraniliprole seed treatment efficiency against Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and residue concentrations in corn plants and soil.氰氟虫腙种子处理对玉米夜蛾(鳞翅目:夜蛾科)的防治效果及在玉米植株和土壤中的残留浓度。
Pest Manag Sci. 2019 May;75(5):1464-1472. doi: 10.1002/ps.5269. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
8
Persistence and metabolism of the diamide insecticide cyantraniliprole in tomato plants.二酰胺类杀虫剂氰氟虫腙在番茄植株中的持久性和代谢。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 3;11(1):21570. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00970-8.
9
Residue and toxicity of cyantraniliprole and its main metabolite J9Z38 in soil-earthworm microcosms.土壤-蚯蚓微宇宙中虫螨腈及其主要代谢物 J9Z38 的残留与毒性。
Chemosphere. 2020 Jun;249:126479. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126479. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
10
Anthranilic Diamide Insecticides Delivered via Multiple Approaches to Control Vegetable Pests: A Case Study in Snap Bean.通过多种途径施用邻甲酰氨基苯甲酰胺类杀虫剂防治蔬菜害虫:以油豆角为例的案例研究
J Econ Entomol. 2016 Dec 1;109(6):2479-2488. doi: 10.1093/jee/tow219.

引用本文的文献

1
Toxicity and Sublethal Effects of Diamide Insecticides on Key Non-Target Natural Predators, the Larvae of L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae).双酰胺类杀虫剂对重要非靶标天敌——瓢虫(鞘翅目:瓢虫科)幼虫的毒性及亚致死效应
Toxics. 2023 Mar 16;11(3):270. doi: 10.3390/toxics11030270.