Suppr超能文献

两种二酰胺类农药滴灌和喷雾施药在玉米中的残留及分布规律和不同消费群体的膳食风险评估。

Residue and distribution of drip irrigation and spray application of two diamide pesticides in corn and dietary risk assessment for different consumer groups.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.

Key Laboratory of Natural Pesticide and Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Nov;102(14):6676-6686. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12035. Epub 2022 Jun 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the use of diamide insecticides on corn continues to increase, there is growing concern about their residue levels on corn and dietary risks to populations. In this study, the distribution, dispersion and transfer efficiency of two diamide insecticides (tetrachlorantraniliprole (TCAP) and cyantraniliprole (CNAP)) in different parts of corn and soil were investigated in a 1-year field trial in Guangzhou and Lanzhou using two different application methods - spray and drip irrigation, respectively - and the dietary risk of the insecticides to different consumer populations was assessed under the two application methods.

RESULTS

The results showed that drip irrigation had a longer persistence period than spraying, and there was a hysteresis in the absorption distribution of the agent in different parts of corn, which was gradually transferred to the leaves after absorption from the roots. The average TE (transfer efficiency) and TE were 0.230-0.261 and 1.749-1.851 for TCAP and 0.168-0.187 and 2.363-2.815 for CNAP, respectively. At corn harvest, both TCAP and CNAP were below detectable levels in soil and corn. For different consumer populations, hazard quotients ranged from 0.001 to 0.066 for TCAP and from 0.003 to 0.568 for CNAP - both well below 100%.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that TCAP and CNAP applied by spray or drip irrigation are safe for long-term risk of human intake and also provides guidance for the use of both insecticides in agricultural production to control corn pests, especially in arid and semi-arid areas. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.

摘要

背景

随着二酰胺类杀虫剂在玉米上的使用不断增加,人们越来越关注其在玉米上的残留水平以及对人群的膳食风险。本研究采用喷雾和滴灌两种不同施药方法,在广州和兰州进行了为期 1 年的田间试验,研究了两种二酰胺类杀虫剂(四氯虫酰胺(TCAP)和氰虫酰胺(CNAP))在玉米不同部位和土壤中的分布、扩散和转移效率,并评估了两种施药方法下不同消费人群的膳食风险。

结果

结果表明,滴灌的持效期长于喷雾,且药剂在玉米不同部位的吸收分布存在滞后现象,从根部吸收后逐渐转移到叶片。TCAP 和 CNAP 的平均 TE(转移效率)和 TE 分别为 0.230-0.261 和 1.749-1.851,0.168-0.187 和 2.363-2.815。玉米收获时,TCAP 和 CNAP 在土壤和玉米中的残留均低于检测限。对于不同的消费人群,TCAP 的危害商数范围为 0.001-0.066,CNAP 的危害商数范围为 0.003-0.568,均远低于 100%。

结论

本研究表明,喷雾或滴灌施用的 TCAP 和 CNAP 对长期人类摄入风险是安全的,也为这两种杀虫剂在农业生产中防治玉米害虫的使用提供了指导,特别是在干旱和半干旱地区。 © 2022 英国化学学会。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验