Suppr超能文献

阿哌沙班或华法林与阿司匹林或安慰剂用于房颤合并既往卒中患者急性冠脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后:来自AUGUSTUS试验的事后分析

Apixaban or Warfarin and Aspirin or Placebo After Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Prior Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis From the AUGUSTUS Trial.

作者信息

Bahit M Cecilia, Vora Amit N, Li Zhuokai, Wojdyla Daniel M, Thomas Laine, Goodman Shaun G, Aronson Ronald, Jordan J Dedrick, Kolls Brad J, Dombrowski Keith E, Vinereanu Dragos, Halvorsen Sigrun, Berwanger Otavio, Windecker Stephan, Mehran Roxana, Granger Christopher B, Alexander John H, Lopes Renato D

机构信息

INECO Neurociencias Oroño, Fundación INECO, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.

UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Jul 1;7(7):682-689. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.1166.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Data are limited regarding the risk of cerebrovascular ischemic events and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

OBJECTIVE

Determine the efficacy and safety of apixaban or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and aspirin or placebo according to prior stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or thromboembolism (TE).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this prospective, multicenter, 2-by-2 factorial, randomized clinical trial, post hoc parallel analyses were performed to compare randomized treatment regimens according to presence or absence of prior stroke/TIA/TE using Cox proportional hazards models. Patients with AF, recent ACS or PCI, and planned use of P2Y12 inhibitors for 6 months or longer were included; 33 patients with missing data about prior stroke/TIA/TE were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Apixaban (5 mg or 2.5 mg twice daily) or VKA and aspirin or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Major or clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding.

RESULTS

Of 4581 patients included, 633 (13.8%) had prior stroke/TIA/TE. Patients with vs without prior stroke/TIA/TE were older; had higher CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED scores; and more frequently had prior bleeding, heart failure, diabetes, and prior oral anticoagulant use. Apixaban was associated with lower rates of major or CRNM bleeding and death or hospitalization than VKA in patients with (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.46-1.03) and without (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57-0.82) prior stroke/TIA/TE. Patients without prior stroke/TIA/TE receiving aspirin vs placebo had higher rates of bleeding; this difference appeared less substantial among patients with prior stroke/TIA/TE (P = .01 for interaction). Aspirin was associated with numerically lower rates of death or ischemic events than placebo in patients with (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.42-1.20) and without (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72-1.21) prior stroke/TIA/TE (not statistically significant).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The safety and efficacy of apixaban compared with VKA was consistent with the AUGUSTUS findings, irrespective of prior stroke/TIA/TE. Aspirin increased major or CRNM bleeding, particularly in patients without prior stroke/TIA/TE. Although aspirin may have some benefit in patients with prior stroke, our findings support the use of apixaban and a P2Y12 inhibitor without aspirin for the majority of patients with AF and ACS and/or PCI, regardless of prior stroke/TIA/TE status.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02415400.

摘要

重要性

关于心房颤动(AF)合并近期急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)和/或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者发生脑血管缺血事件和大出血风险的数据有限。

目的

根据既往中风、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或血栓栓塞(TE)情况,确定阿哌沙班或维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)与阿司匹林或安慰剂的疗效和安全性。

设计、设置和参与者:在这项前瞻性、多中心、2×2析因随机临床试验中,进行事后平行分析,使用Cox比例风险模型根据有无既往中风/TIA/TE比较随机治疗方案。纳入AF、近期ACS或PCI且计划使用P2Y12抑制剂6个月或更长时间的患者;排除33例有既往中风/TIA/TE缺失数据的患者。

干预措施

阿哌沙班(5毫克或2.5毫克,每日两次)或VKA以及阿司匹林或安慰剂。

主要结局和测量指标

大出血或临床相关非大出血(CRNM)。

结果

在纳入的4581例患者中,633例(13.8%)有既往中风/TIA/TE。有既往中风/TIA/TE的患者比没有的患者年龄更大;CHA2DS2-VASC和HAS-BLED评分更高;更频繁地有既往出血、心力衰竭、糖尿病和既往口服抗凝药使用史。在有(风险比[HR],0.69;95%CI,0.46-1.03)和没有(HR,0.68;95%CI,0.57-0.82)既往中风/TIA/TE的患者中,阿哌沙班与大出血或CRNM以及死亡或住院率低于VKA相关。没有既往中风/TIA/TE且接受阿司匹林的患者与接受安慰剂的患者相比出血率更高;在有既往中风/TIA/TE的患者中这种差异似乎不那么显著(交互作用P=0.01)。在有(HR,0.71;95%CI,0.42-1.

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验