The George Institute for Global Health UK, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Research Organization (ARO), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Sep 3;84(10):875-885. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.022.
The optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who had an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not known.
The authors sought to determine which antithrombotic regimen best balances safety and efficacy.
AUGUSTUS, a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial design randomized trial compared apixaban with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin with placebo in patients with AF with recent ACS and/or PCI treated with a P2Y inhibitor. We conducted a 4-way analysis comparing safety and efficacy outcomes in the 4 randomized groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes over 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary endpoint.
A total of 4,614 patients were enrolled. All patients were treated with a P2Y inhibitor. The primary endpoint occurred in 21.9% of patients randomized to apixaban plus placebo, 27.3% randomized to apixaban plus aspirin, 28.0% randomized to VKA plus placebo, and 33.3% randomized to VKA plus aspirin. Rates of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and hospitalization for cardiovascular causes were lower with apixaban and placebo compared with the other 3 antithrombotic strategies. There was no difference between the 4 randomized groups with respect to all-cause death.
In patients with AF and a recent ACS and/or PCI, an antithrombotic regimen that included a P2Y inhibitor and apixaban without aspirin resulted in a lower incidence of the composite of death, bleeding, or cardiovascular hospitalization than regimens including VKA, aspirin, or both. (An Open-label, 2 x 2 Factorial, Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Apixaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonist and Aspirin vs. Aspirin Placebo in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT02415400).
患有急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的心房颤动(AF)患者的最佳抗栓治疗方案尚不清楚。
作者旨在确定哪种抗栓治疗方案在安全性和疗效方面最具优势。
AUGUSTUS 是一项多中心 2×2 析因设计随机试验,比较了阿哌沙班与维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)和阿司匹林与安慰剂在近期 ACS 和/或 PCI 后接受 P2Y 抑制剂治疗的 AF 患者中的疗效。我们进行了 4 种方式分析,比较了 4 种随机分组的安全性和疗效结果。主要终点是 6 个月随访期间全因死亡、大出血或临床相关非大出血或心血管原因住院的复合终点。次要终点包括主要终点的各个组成部分。
共纳入 4614 例患者。所有患者均接受 P2Y 抑制剂治疗。阿哌沙班+安慰剂组、阿哌沙班+阿司匹林组、VKA+安慰剂组和 VKA+阿司匹林组的主要终点发生率分别为 21.9%、27.3%、28.0%和 33.3%。与其他 3 种抗栓策略相比,阿哌沙班和安慰剂组的大出血或临床相关非大出血和心血管原因住院的发生率较低。4 种随机分组之间在全因死亡率方面无差异。
在近期 ACS 和/或 PCI 后的 AF 患者中,包含 P2Y 抑制剂和阿哌沙班而不含阿司匹林的抗栓方案与包含 VKA、阿司匹林或两者的方案相比,死亡、出血或心血管住院的复合发生率较低。(一项开放性、2×2 析因、随机对照、临床试验,旨在评估阿哌沙班与维生素 K 拮抗剂和阿司匹林与阿司匹林安慰剂在伴有急性冠状动脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者中的安全性;NCT02415400)。