Suppr超能文献

《国际疾病分类第11版》对韩国临床编码准确性的影响。

Impact of the ICD-11 on the accuracy of clinical coding in Korea.

作者信息

Lee Hyunkyung, Kim Sukil

机构信息

Resource Management Office, Kunsan American Airbase Hospital, Kunsan Air Base, Korea.

Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Health Inf Manag. 2023 Sep;52(3):221-228. doi: 10.1177/18333583221095147. Epub 2022 May 25.

Abstract

ICD-11 was officially released at the World Health Assembly on 25 May 2019. To find effective ways to increase the accuracy of coding for diagnostic terms in Korea for a stable transition from Korean modification of ICD-10 (7th Revision of Korean Classification of Disease, KCD-7) to ICD-11. A total of 27 skilled Korean health information managers performed KCD-7 and ICD-11 coding simultaneously (line coding [56]; case coding [17]). Accuracy rates and percentage agreements were calculated, and granularity and difficulty of the ICD-11 were rated by participants. The average accuracy rate of line coding was 71.6 % in ICD-11 and 80.2% in KCD-7, which was similar to results in other studies. The mean percentage agreements for ICD-11 and KCD-7 for line coding were 64.2% and 72.1%, respectively; while for case coding it was 15.3% and 26.6%. Selection criteria for the case scenarios may have influenced the low agreements in case coding. Cluster coding, changes of terms in ICD-11 and removal of codes used in ICD-10 contributed to low agreement in ICD-11 (46.6% of participants reported that granularity of ICD-11 was similar to ICD-10, while 36.9% reported that ICD-11 had finer granularity). In terms of difficulty, 15.3% of participants found line coding difficult and 10.9% found case coding difficult. Provision of more detailed reference guidelines and efficient training for coding professionals by the World Health Organization would enable ICD-11 to be an excellent tool for gathering relevant information about diseases in Korea.

摘要

《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)于2019年5月25日在世界卫生大会上正式发布。为了找到有效的方法来提高韩国诊断术语编码的准确性,以实现从《国际疾病分类第10版韩国修订本》(《韩国疾病分类第7版》,KCD - 7)到ICD - 11的平稳过渡。共有27名技术熟练的韩国健康信息管理人员同时进行KCD - 7和ICD - 11编码(行编码[56];病例编码[17])。计算准确率和百分比一致性,并由参与者对ICD - 11的粒度和难度进行评分。ICD - 11中行编码的平均准确率为71.6%,KCD - 7中为80.2%,这与其他研究结果相似。ICD - 11和KCD - 7行编码的平均百分比一致性分别为64.2%和72.1%;而病例编码分别为15.3%和26.6%。病例场景的选择标准可能影响了病例编码的低一致性。聚类编码、ICD - 11中术语的变化以及ICD - 10中使用的代码的删除导致了ICD - 11中的低一致性(46.6%的参与者报告说ICD - 11的粒度与ICD - 10相似,而36.9%的参与者报告说ICD - 11的粒度更细)。在难度方面,15.3%的参与者认为行编码困难,10.9%的参与者认为病例编码困难。世界卫生组织为编码专业人员提供更详细的参考指南和高效培训,将使ICD - 11成为收集韩国疾病相关信息的优秀工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验