Suppr超能文献

第十一版国际疾病分类:与 ICD-10 和 ICD-10-CM 的比较分析。

The new International Classification of Diseases 11th edition: a comparative analysis with ICD-10 and ICD-10-CM.

机构信息

Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):738-746. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa030.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the newly adopted International Classification of Diseases 11th revision (ICD-11) and compare it to the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) and International Classification of Diseases 10th revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

: Data files and maps were downloaded from the World Health Organization (WHO) website and through the application programming interfaces. A round trip method based on the WHO maps was used to identify equivalent codes between ICD-10 and ICD-11, which were validated by limited manual review. ICD-11 terms were mapped to ICD-10-CM through normalized lexical mapping. ICD-10-CM codes in 6 disease areas were also manually recoded in ICD-11.

RESULTS

Excluding the chapters for traditional medicine, functioning assessment, and extension codes for postcoordination, ICD-11 has 14 622 leaf codes (codes that can be used in coding) compared to ICD-10 and ICD-10-CM, which has 10 607 and 71 932 leaf codes, respectively. We identified 4037 pairs of ICD-10 and ICD-11 codes that were equivalent (estimated accuracy of 96%) by our round trip method. Lexical matching between ICD-11 and ICD-10-CM identified 4059 pairs of possibly equivalent codes. Manual recoding showed that 60% of a sample of 388 ICD-10-CM codes could be fully represented in ICD-11 by precoordinated codes or postcoordination.

CONCLUSION

In ICD-11, there is a moderate increase in the number of codes over ICD-10. With postcoordination, it is possible to fully represent the meaning of a high proportion of ICD-10-CM codes, especially with the addition of a limited number of extension codes.

摘要

目的

研究新采用的国际疾病分类第 11 版(ICD-11),并将其与国际疾病分类第 10 版(ICD-10)和国际疾病分类第 10 版临床修订版(ICD-10-CM)进行比较。

材料和方法

从世界卫生组织(WHO)网站和应用程序编程接口下载数据文件和映射。采用基于 WHO 映射的往返方法,确定 ICD-10 与 ICD-11 之间等效的代码,并通过有限的手动审核进行验证。通过标准化词汇映射将 ICD-11 术语映射到 ICD-10-CM。还手动重新编码了 6 个疾病领域的 ICD-10-CM 代码到 ICD-11。

结果

不包括传统医学、功能评估和后置协调扩展代码的章节,ICD-11 有 14622 个叶码(可用于编码的代码),而 ICD-10 和 ICD-10-CM 分别有 10607 个和 71932 个叶码。我们通过往返方法确定了 4037 对等效的 ICD-10 和 ICD-11 代码(估计准确率为 96%)。ICD-11 与 ICD-10-CM 之间的词汇匹配确定了 4059 对可能等效的代码。手动重新编码显示,388 个 ICD-10-CM 代码样本的 60%可以通过前置协调或后置协调完全表示在 ICD-11 中。

结论

在 ICD-11 中,代码数量比 ICD-10 适度增加。通过后置协调,可以充分表示 ICD-10-CM 代码的很大一部分含义,尤其是在添加少量扩展代码的情况下。

相似文献

7
Postcoordination of codes in ICD-11.ICD-11 中的编码后协调。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 17;21(Suppl 6):379. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01876-9.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
ICD-11.国际疾病分类第11版
Lancet. 2019 Jun 8;393(10188):2275. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31205-X. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
6
[ICD-11-Adapting ICD to the 21st century].[《国际疾病分类第11版——使国际疾病分类适应21世纪》]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Jul;61(7):771-777. doi: 10.1007/s00103-018-2755-6.
9
ICD-10: History and Context.国际疾病分类第十版:历史与背景。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Apr;37(4):596-9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4696. Epub 2016 Jan 28.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验