Hawkins W Anthony, Kim Jennifer Y, Smith Susan E, Sikora Newsome Andrea, Hall Ronald G
University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Albany, GA, USA.
Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Jun;57(3):329-335. doi: 10.1177/00185787211032359. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
Propofol is a key component for the management of sedation and shivering during targeted temperature management (TTM) following cardiac arrest. The cardiac depressant effects of propofol have not been described during TTM and may be especially relevant given the stress to the myocardium following cardiac arrest. The purpose of this study is to describe hemodynamic changes associated with propofol administration during TTM. This single center, retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients who received a propofol infusion for at least 30 minutes during TTM. The primary outcome was the change in cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (cvSOFA) score 30 minutes after propofol initiation. Secondary outcomes included change in systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and vasopressor requirements (VR) expressed as norepinephrine equivalents at 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after propofol initiation. A multivariate regression was performed to assess the influence of propofol and body temperature on MAP, while controlling for vasopressor dose and cardiac arrest hospital prognosis (CAHP) score. The cohort included 40 patients with a median CAHP score of 197. The goal temperature of 33°C was achieved for all patients. The median cvSOFA score was 1 at baseline and 0.5 at 30 minutes, with a non-significant change after propofol initiation ( = .96). SBP and MAP reductions were the greatest at 60 minutes (17 and 8 mmHg; < .05 for both). The median change in HR at 120 minutes was -9 beats/minute from baseline. This reduction was sustained through 240 minutes ( < .05). No change in VR were seen at any time point. In multivariate regression, body temperature was the only characteristic independently associated with changes in MAP (coefficient 4.95, 95% CI 1.6-8.3). Administration of propofol during TTM did not affect cvSOFA score. The reductions in SBP, MAP, and HR did not have a corresponding change in vasopressor requirements and are likely not clinically meaningful. Propofol appears to be a safe choice for sedation in patients receiving targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest.
丙泊酚是心脏骤停后目标温度管理(TTM)期间镇静和寒战管理的关键组成部分。在TTM期间,丙泊酚的心脏抑制作用尚未见描述,鉴于心脏骤停后心肌所承受的压力,这可能尤为重要。本研究的目的是描述TTM期间丙泊酚给药相关的血流动力学变化。这项单中心回顾性队列研究评估了在TTM期间接受丙泊酚输注至少30分钟的成年患者。主要结局是丙泊酚开始输注后30分钟时心血管序贯器官衰竭评估(cvSOFA)评分的变化。次要结局包括丙泊酚开始输注后30、60、120、180和240分钟时收缩压(SBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)的变化以及血管升压药需求量(VR)(以去甲肾上腺素当量表示)。进行多变量回归以评估丙泊酚和体温对MAP的影响,同时控制血管升压药剂量和心脏骤停医院预后(CAHP)评分。该队列包括40例患者,CAHP评分中位数为197。所有患者均达到33°C的目标温度。cvSOFA评分中位数在基线时为1,30分钟时为0.5,丙泊酚开始输注后变化无统计学意义(P = 0.96)。SBP和MAP在60分钟时下降幅度最大(分别为17和8 mmHg;两者P均<0.05)。120分钟时HR中位数较基线下降9次/分钟。这种下降持续至240分钟(P<0.05)。在任何时间点VR均无变化。在多变量回归中,体温是唯一与MAP变化独立相关的特征(系数4.95,95%可信区间1.6 - 8.3)。TTM期间丙泊酚给药不影响cvSOFA评分。SBP、MAP和HR的下降并未伴随血管升压药需求量的相应变化,可能无临床意义。丙泊酚似乎是心脏骤停后接受目标温度管理患者镇静的安全选择。