• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面对不确定性:儿童社交焦虑障碍中对模糊情绪面孔的解读。

Facing Uncertainty: Interpretation of Ambiguous Emotional Faces in Childhood Social Anxiety Disorder.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University.

Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University.

出版信息

J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2022 Nov-Dec;51(6):955-969. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2070850. Epub 2022 May 26.

DOI:10.1080/15374416.2022.2070850
PMID:35617097
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The current study examined whether children with a social anxiety disorder (SAD) demonstrate divergent facial emotion processing and a disorder-specific negative interpretation bias in the processing of facial emotional expressions. This study aimed to overcome previous study limitations by including both a nonsocially anxious control group and a healthy control group to examine whether childhood SAD is characterized by a general emotion labeling deficit, and/or by a negative interpretation bias, indicated by systematic misclassifications, or a lower threshold for recognizing threatening emotions.

METHOD

Participants were 132 children aged 7-12 years (= 9.15; 45.5% female). Children with SAD ( = 42) were compared to children with other, nonsocial, anxiety disorders ( = 40) and healthy control children ( = 50) on a novel facial emotion recognition task. Children judged ambiguous happy/neutral, angry/neutral and fear/neutral faces that were morphed at different intensities (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%).

RESULTS

Children with SAD did not differ from other groups in their accuracy of identifying emotions. They did not show systematic misclassifications or a heightened sensitivity to negative, threatening faces either. Rather, children with nonsocial anxiety disorders showed a generally heightened sensitivity to emotional faces.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study does not provide evidence for a general deficit in labeling of emotional faces in childhood SAD. Childhood SAD was not characterized by an interpretation bias in processing emotional faces. Children with nonsocial anxiety disorders may benefit from assistance in accurately interpreting the degree of emotionality in interpersonal situations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在考察社交焦虑障碍(SAD)儿童在处理面部情绪表达时是否表现出不同的面部情绪加工和特定于障碍的负性解释偏差。本研究通过纳入非社交焦虑对照组和健康对照组来克服以往研究的局限性,旨在考察儿童 SAD 是否表现出一般的情绪标签缺陷,以及/或者是否表现出负性解释偏差,表现为系统的错误分类,或识别威胁情绪的阈值较低。

方法

参与者为 132 名 7-12 岁的儿童(年龄均数=9.15,45.5%为女性)。SAD 儿童(n=42)与其他非社交焦虑障碍儿童(n=40)和健康对照组儿童(n=50)在一项新的面部情绪识别任务上进行了比较。儿童判断模糊的快乐/中性、愤怒/中性和恐惧/中性面孔,这些面孔以不同的强度(10%、30%、50%、70%)进行变形。

结果

SAD 儿童在识别情绪的准确性上与其他组没有差异。他们也没有表现出系统的错误分类或对负面、威胁性面孔的敏感性增加。相反,非社交焦虑障碍儿童对面部情绪表现出普遍较高的敏感性。

结论

本研究没有提供证据表明儿童 SAD 在情绪面孔的标签识别上存在一般缺陷。儿童 SAD 在处理情绪面孔时没有表现出解释偏差。非社交焦虑障碍儿童可能需要帮助来准确地解读人际情境中的情绪程度。

相似文献

1
Facing Uncertainty: Interpretation of Ambiguous Emotional Faces in Childhood Social Anxiety Disorder.面对不确定性:儿童社交焦虑障碍中对模糊情绪面孔的解读。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2022 Nov-Dec;51(6):955-969. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2070850. Epub 2022 May 26.
2
Angry-happy interpretations of ambiguous faces in social anxiety disorder.社交焦虑障碍患者对面部表情的愤怒-快乐解释偏向。
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Jul 30;241:122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.100. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
3
Reduced early neural processing of faces in children and adolescents with social anxiety disorder.社交焦虑障碍儿童和青少年早期面部神经加工减少。
Biol Psychol. 2024 Sep;191:108827. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108827. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
4
Children with social anxiety disorder show blunted pupillary reactivity and altered eye contact processing in response to emotional faces: Insights from pupillometry and eye movements.患有社交焦虑障碍的儿童在对情绪面孔做出反应时,瞳孔反应迟钝,眼神接触处理方式发生改变:瞳孔测量和眼动研究的新发现。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Aug;58:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
5
Extraction of mean emotional tone from face arrays in social anxiety disorder.从社交焦虑障碍的面部表情中提取平均情绪基调。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Mar;35(3):248-255. doi: 10.1002/da.22713. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
6
Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing.糟糕的是:社交焦虑中对愤怒面孔的偏向会干扰身份识别过程。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:136-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
7
Distinct patterns of monocular advantage for facial emotions in social anxiety.社交焦虑中单眼优势对面部情绪的不同模式。
J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Jun;104:102871. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102871. Epub 2024 May 5.
8
Facial gender but not emotion distinguishes neural responses of 10- to 13-year-old children with social anxiety disorder from healthy and clinical controls.面部性别而非情绪可区分10至13岁社交焦虑障碍儿童与健康及临床对照者的神经反应。
Biol Psychol. 2018 May;135:36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
9
Heightened sensitivity to emotional expressions in generalised anxiety disorder, compared to social anxiety disorder, and controls.与社交焦虑障碍及对照组相比,广泛性焦虑障碍患者对情绪表达的敏感性增强。
Cogn Emot. 2017 Jan;31(1):119-126. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1087973. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
10
Social anxiety disorder women easily recognize fearfull, sad and happy faces: the influence of gender.社交焦虑障碍女性能够轻松识别恐惧、悲伤和快乐的面部表情:性别影响
J Psychiatr Res. 2010 Jun;44(8):535-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.11.003. Epub 2009 Dec 4.