社交焦虑障碍患者对面部表情的愤怒-快乐解释偏向。

Angry-happy interpretations of ambiguous faces in social anxiety disorder.

机构信息

School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69987, Israel.

Section on Bipolar Spectrum Disorders, Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2016 Jul 30;241:122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.100. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

Abstract

Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is characterized by a tendency to interpret ambiguous social cues as negative. Here we tested whether interpretation of ambiguous faces differs between participants with SAD and non-anxious controls. Twenty-seven individuals with SAD and 21 non-anxious control participants completed an emotion recognition task in which they judged ambiguous morphed faces as happy or angry. Participants with SAD judged a higher proportion of the faces as angry compared to non-anxious participants, and were slower to judge faces as angry compared to happy, while no such reaction time bias manifested in the control group. Finally, happy judgments were slower in the SAD group compared to the control group, while angry judgments were faster in the SAD group compared to the control group. These findings provide evidence for a negative bias in resolving emotional ambiguity in facial expressions among individuals with SAD.

摘要

社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的特征是倾向于将模棱两可的社交线索解释为负面的。在这里,我们测试了 SAD 患者和非焦虑对照者在解释模棱两可的面部表情时是否存在差异。27 名 SAD 患者和 21 名非焦虑对照者完成了一项情绪识别任务,他们需要判断模棱两可的变形面孔是快乐还是愤怒。与非焦虑组相比,SAD 患者判断更多的面孔为愤怒,而且判断面孔为愤怒比判断为快乐时更慢,而对照组则没有表现出这种反应时间偏差。最后,SAD 组的快乐判断比对照组慢,而 SAD 组的愤怒判断比对照组快。这些发现为 SAD 患者在面部表情中解决情绪模糊性时存在负面偏见提供了证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索