Ritschl Valentin, Eibensteiner Fabian, Mosor Erika, Omara Maisa, Sperl Lisa, Nawaz Faisal A, Siva Sai Chandragiri, Cenanovic Merisa, Devkota Hari Prasad, Hribersek Mojca, De Ronita, Klager Elisabeth, Schaden Eva, Kletecka-Pulker Maria, Völkl-Kernstock Sabine, Willschke Harald, Aufricht Christoph, Atanasov Atanas G, Stamm Tanja
Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria.
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):e35754. doi: 10.2196/35754.
On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization Emergency Committee declared the rapid worldwide spread of COVID-19 a global health emergency. By December 2020, the safety and efficacy of the first COVID-19 vaccines had been demonstrated. However, international vaccination coverage rates have remained below expectations (in Europe at the time of manuscript submission). Controversial mandatory vaccination is currently being discussed and has already been introduced in some countries (Austria, Greece, and Italy). We used the Twitter survey system as a viable method to quickly and comprehensively gather international public health insights on mandatory vaccination against COVID-19.
The purpose of this study was to better understand the public's perception of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination in real time using Twitter polls.
Two Twitter polls were developed (in the English language) to seek the public's opinion on the possibility of mandatory vaccination. The polls were pinned to the Digital Health and Patient Safety Platform's (based in Vienna, Austria) Twitter timeline for 1 week in mid-November 2021, 3 days after the official public announcement of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination in Austria. Twitter users were asked to participate and retweet the polls to reach the largest possible audience.
Our Twitter polls revealed two extremes on the topic of mandatory vaccination against COVID-19. Almost half of the 2545 respondents (n=1246, 49%) favor mandatory vaccination, at least in certain areas. This attitude contrasts with the 45.7% (n=1162) who categorically reject mandatory vaccination. Over one-quarter (n=621, 26.3%) of participating Twitter users said they would never get vaccinated, as reflected by the current Western European and North American vaccination coverage rate. Concatenating interpretation of these two polls should be done cautiously as participating populations might substantially differ.
Mandatory vaccination against COVID-19 (in at least certain areas) is favored by less than 50%, whereas it is opposed by almost half of the surveyed Twitter users. Since (social) media strongly influences public perceptions and views, and social media discussions and surveys are specifically susceptible to the "echo chamber effect," the results should be interpreted as a momentary snapshot. Therefore, the results of this study need to be complemented by long-term surveys to maintain their validity.
2020年1月30日,世界卫生组织突发事件委员会宣布新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)在全球迅速传播构成全球卫生紧急事件。到2020年12月,首批COVID-19疫苗的安全性和有效性已得到证实。然而,国际疫苗接种覆盖率仍低于预期(在撰写本文时的欧洲)。目前正在讨论有争议的强制接种疫苗问题,并且已经在一些国家(奥地利、希腊和意大利)实施。我们将推特调查系统作为一种可行的方法,以快速、全面地收集国际上关于COVID-19强制接种疫苗的公共卫生见解。
本研究的目的是通过推特民意调查实时更好地了解公众对COVID-19强制接种疫苗的看法。
设计了两项推特民意调查(英文),以征求公众对强制接种疫苗可能性的意见。在奥地利正式公开宣布COVID-19强制接种疫苗3天后,即2021年11月中旬,这两项民意调查被固定在数字健康与患者安全平台(位于奥地利维也纳)的推特时间轴上一周。推特用户被要求参与并转发民意调查,以覆盖尽可能多的受众。
我们的推特民意调查揭示了在COVID-19强制接种疫苗这一话题上的两个极端。在2545名受访者中,近一半(n=1246,49%)赞成强制接种疫苗,至少在某些领域。这种态度与坚决拒绝强制接种疫苗的45.7%(n=1162)形成对比。超过四分之一(n=621,26.3%)参与调查的推特用户表示他们永远不会接种疫苗,这与当前西欧和北美的疫苗接种覆盖率情况相符。由于参与人群可能存在很大差异,对这两项民意调查结果的综合解读应谨慎进行。
不到50%的人赞成COVID-19强制接种疫苗(至少在某些领域),而近一半接受调查的推特用户表示反对。由于(社交)媒体强烈影响公众认知和观点,且社交媒体讨论和调查特别容易受到“回音室效应”的影响,因此这些结果应被视为一个瞬间的快照。因此,本研究结果需要通过长期调查加以补充,以保持其有效性。