Bruijns Brigitte, Folkertsma Laura, Tiggelaar Roald
Salvitat BV, Colosseum 15, 7521 PV, Enschede, the Netherlands.
NanoLab Cleanroom, MESA Institute, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7500 AE, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Biosens Bioelectron X. 2022 Sep;11:100158. doi: 10.1016/j.biosx.2022.100158. Epub 2022 May 21.
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, 10 manufacturers of molecular tests for SARS-CoV-2 have received Emergency Use Authorizations from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for point-of-care or over the counter use. In this review, the working principle of these tests is described as well as the relevant characteristics (e.g. time-to-result and specimen type). The analytical (e.g. analytical sensitivity) and clinical performance (positive and negative percent agreement) and useability characteristics (e.g. cost, reusability and throughput) of these tests are compared and critically reviewed. Also details for relevant respiratory multiplex assays of these 10 manufacturers are discussed. Critical review of scientific literature on these authorized tests revealed that for many of these tests publications are almost or completely absent, with the exception of two systems. The Xpert Xpress has been thoroughly investigated and good performance has been reported, whereas ID NOW is also well-represented in literature, but has relatively low sensitivity.
自新冠疫情开始以来,10家SARS-CoV-2分子检测制造商已获得美国食品药品监督管理局的即时检测或非处方使用紧急使用授权。在本综述中,描述了这些检测的工作原理以及相关特性(如出结果时间和样本类型)。对这些检测的分析性能(如分析灵敏度)、临床性能(阳性和阴性百分比一致性)和使用特性(如成本、可重复使用性和通量)进行了比较和批判性审查。还讨论了这10家制造商相关呼吸道多重检测的细节。对这些授权检测的科学文献进行批判性审查发现,除了两个系统外,许多此类检测几乎没有或完全没有相关出版物。Xpert Xpress已得到充分研究并报告了良好性能,而ID NOW在文献中也有较多体现,但灵敏度相对较低。