• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三阴性乳腺癌中 PD-L1 表达错分类的风险。

The risk of PD-L1 expression misclassification in triple-negative breast cancer.

机构信息

B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Institute of Pathology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Dafna 5, 6492601, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jul;194(2):297-305. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06630-3. Epub 2022 May 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-022-06630-3
PMID:35622241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9239943/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Stratification of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) for anti-PD-L1 therapy is based on PD-L1 expression in tumor biopsies. This study sought to evaluate the risk of PD-L1 misclassification.

METHODS

We conducted a high-resolution analysis on ten surgical specimens of TNBC. First, we determined PD-L1 expression pattern distribution via manual segmentation and measurement of 6666 microscopic clusters of positive PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining. Then, based on these results, we generated a computer model to calculate the effect of the positive PD-L1 fraction, aggregate size, and distribution of PD-L1 positive cells on the diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

Our computer-based model showed that larger aggregates of PD-L1 positive cells and smaller biopsy size were associated with higher fraction of false results (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, our model showed a significant increase in error rate when the fraction of PD-L1 expression was close to the cut-off (error rate of 12.1%, 0.84%, and 0.65% for PD-L1 positivity of 0.5-1.5%, ≤ 0.5% ,and ≥ 1.5%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Interestingly, false positive results were significantly higher than false negative results (0.51-22.62%, with an average of 6.31% versus 0.11-11.36% with an average of 1.58% for false positive and false negative results, respectively, P < 0.05). Furthermore, heterogeneous tumors with different aggregate sizes in the same tumor, were associated with increased rate of false results in comparison to homogenous tumors (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our model can be used to estimate the risk of PD-L1 misclassification in biopsies, with potential implications for treatment decisions.

摘要

目的

三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者的分层治疗基于肿瘤活检中 PD-L1 的表达。本研究旨在评估 PD-L1 分类错误的风险。

方法

我们对 10 例 TNBC 手术标本进行了高分辨率分析。首先,我们通过手动分割和测量 6666 个 PD-L1 免疫组化染色阳性的微观簇,确定 PD-L1 表达模式分布。然后,根据这些结果,我们生成了一个计算机模型,以计算阳性 PD-L1 分数、聚集大小和 PD-L1 阳性细胞分布对诊断准确性的影响。

结果

我们的基于计算机的模型显示,较大的 PD-L1 阳性细胞聚集和较小的活检大小与更高的假结果分数相关(分别为 P<0.001,P<0.001)。此外,当 PD-L1 表达分数接近截止值时,我们的模型显示出显著增加的错误率(PD-L1 阳性率为 0.5-1.5%时,错误率为 12.1%、0.84%和 0.65%,阳性率为≤0.5%和阳性率为≥1.5%时,错误率分别为 0.01%和 0.01%,P<0.0001)。有趣的是,假阳性结果明显高于假阴性结果(0.51-22.62%,平均为 6.31%,而假阳性和假阴性结果的平均分别为 0.11-11.36%和 1.58%,P<0.05)。此外,与同质肿瘤相比,同一肿瘤中具有不同聚集大小的异质肿瘤与假结果率增加相关(P<0.001)。

结论

我们的模型可用于估计活检中 PD-L1 分类错误的风险,对治疗决策具有潜在影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/9c185089810e/10549_2022_6630_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/8a5b8a355dc7/10549_2022_6630_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/15eba722aad2/10549_2022_6630_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/8d15e5d456f4/10549_2022_6630_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/b027bd9001bd/10549_2022_6630_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/30db00bead52/10549_2022_6630_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/e961a3f12ef5/10549_2022_6630_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/9c185089810e/10549_2022_6630_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/8a5b8a355dc7/10549_2022_6630_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/15eba722aad2/10549_2022_6630_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/8d15e5d456f4/10549_2022_6630_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/b027bd9001bd/10549_2022_6630_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/30db00bead52/10549_2022_6630_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/e961a3f12ef5/10549_2022_6630_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e1d/9239943/9c185089810e/10549_2022_6630_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The risk of PD-L1 expression misclassification in triple-negative breast cancer.三阴性乳腺癌中 PD-L1 表达错分类的风险。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jul;194(2):297-305. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06630-3. Epub 2022 May 27.
2
Diagnostic biopsy does not accurately reflect the PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer.诊断性活检不能准确反映三阴性乳腺癌中 PD-L1 的表达。
Clin Exp Med. 2023 Dec;23(8):5121-5127. doi: 10.1007/s10238-023-01190-2. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
3
PD-L1 diagnostics in the neoadjuvant setting: implications of intratumoral heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in triple negative breast cancer for assessment in small biopsies.新辅助治疗环境下的 PD-L1 检测:三阴性乳腺癌中 PD-L1 表达的肿瘤内异质性对小活检评估的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun;181(3):553-560. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05655-w. Epub 2020 May 2.
4
Evaluation of alternative prognostic thresholds for SP142 and 22C3 immunohistochemical PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer: results from a population-based cohort.三阴性乳腺癌中SP142和22C3免疫组化检测PD-L1表达的替代预后阈值评估:基于人群队列的结果
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Apr;210(2):271-284. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07561-x. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
5
Reanalysis of the NCCN PD-L1 companion diagnostic assay study for lung cancer in the context of PD-L1 expression findings in triple-negative breast cancer.在三阴性乳腺癌中 PD-L1 表达结果的背景下,对 NCCN PD-L1 伴随诊断检测用于肺癌的研究进行重新分析。
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Jun 13;21(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1156-6.
6
Immunohistochemical comparison of three programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays in triple-negative breast cancer.三种程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)检测方法在三阴性乳腺癌中的免疫组化比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 24;16(9):e0257860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257860. eCollection 2021.
7
The predictive and prognostic value of Foxp3+/CD25+ regulatory T cells and PD-L1 expression in triple negative breast cancer.Foxp3+/CD25+ 调节性 T 细胞和 PD-L1 表达在三阴性乳腺癌中的预测和预后价值。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2019 Jun;40:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
8
Significance of the effects of chemotherapy on programmed death-ligand 1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer.化疗对三阴性乳腺癌程序性死亡配体1表达影响的意义
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2022 Oct 6;52(10):1167-1175. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyac106.
9
Intratumor spatial heterogeneity in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression in early-stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌中程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)蛋白表达的肿瘤内空间异质性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Sep;201(2):289-298. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06977-1. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
10
Let-7a/cMyc/CCAT1/miR-17-5p Circuit Re-sensitizes Atezolizumab Resistance in Triple Negative Breast Cancer through Modulating PD-L1.Let-7a/c-Myc/CCAT1/miR-17-5p 环路通过调控 PD-L1 重新敏化三阴性乳腺癌对阿特珠单抗的耐药性。
Pathol Res Pract. 2023 Aug;248:154579. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154579. Epub 2023 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic biopsy does not accurately reflect the PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer.诊断性活检不能准确反映三阴性乳腺癌中 PD-L1 的表达。
Clin Exp Med. 2023 Dec;23(8):5121-5127. doi: 10.1007/s10238-023-01190-2. Epub 2023 Oct 7.

本文引用的文献

1
The Degree of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positivity as a Determinant of Outcomes in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treated With First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)阳性程度作为一线免疫检查点抑制剂治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌预后的决定因素
Cureus. 2022 Jan 9;14(1):e21065. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21065. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Determining PD-L1 Status in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Lessons Learned From IMpassion130.确定三阴性乳腺癌患者的 PD-L1 状态:来自 IMpassion130 的经验教训。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 May 9;114(5):664-675. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab121.
3
First-line atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel for unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: IMpassion130 final overall survival analysis.
一线阿替利珠单抗联合白蛋白紫杉醇治疗不可切除、局部晚期或转移性三阴性乳腺癌:IMpassion130 最终总生存分析。
Ann Oncol. 2021 Aug;32(8):983-993. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.355. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
4
Spatial heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression and the risk for misclassification of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌中PD-L1表达的空间异质性及PD-L1免疫组化误判风险
Lung Cancer. 2020 Sep;147:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
5
Triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtyping and treatment progress.三阴性乳腺癌分子分型及治疗进展。
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Jun 9;22(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01296-5.
6
PD-L1 diagnostics in the neoadjuvant setting: implications of intratumoral heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in triple negative breast cancer for assessment in small biopsies.新辅助治疗环境下的 PD-L1 检测:三阴性乳腺癌中 PD-L1 表达的肿瘤内异质性对小活检评估的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun;181(3):553-560. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05655-w. Epub 2020 May 2.
7
Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.帕博利珠单抗治疗早期三阴性乳腺癌。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 27;382(9):810-821. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910549.
8
FDA Approval Summary: Atezolizumab Plus Paclitaxel Protein-bound for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced or Metastatic TNBC Whose Tumors Express PD-L1.FDA 批准概要:阿替利珠单抗联合紫杉醇蛋白结合物用于治疗肿瘤表达 PD-L1 的晚期或转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者。
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 May 15;26(10):2284-2289. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3545. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
Impact of Specimen Characteristics on PD-L1 Testing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Validation of the IASLC PD-L1 Testing Recommendations.标本特征对非小细胞肺癌 PD-L1 检测的影响:IASLC PD-L1 检测推荐的验证。
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Dec;14(12):2062-2070. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.2503. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
10
Treatment-Related Adverse Events of PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitors in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.临床试验中 PD-1 和 PD-L1 抑制剂的治疗相关不良反应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;5(7):1008-1019. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0393.