García-Ruiz Irene, Quiñones Andrés, Taborsky Michael
Division of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, CH-3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland.
Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Sci Adv. 2022 May 27;8(21):eabl7853. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abl7853.
The evolution of cooperative breeding has been traditionally attributed to the effect of kin selection. While there is increasing empirical evidence that direct fitness benefits are relevant, the relative importance of alternative selection mechanisms is largely obscure. Here, we model the coevolution of the cornerstones of cooperative breeding, delayed dispersal, and alloparental care, across different ecological scenarios while allowing individuals to adjust philopatry and helping levels. Our results suggest that (i) direct fitness benefits from grouping are the main driver for the evolution of philopatry; (ii) kin selection is mainly responsible for the emergence of alloparental care, but group augmentation can be a sufficient promoter in harsh environments; (iii) the coevolution of philopatry and alloparental care is subject to positive feedback; and (iv) age-dependent dispersal is triggered by both group benefits and relatedness. Model predictions are supported by empirical data and provide good opportunities for comparative analyses and experimental tests of causality.
传统上,合作繁殖的进化被归因于亲缘选择的作用。虽然越来越多的实证证据表明直接适合度益处是相关的,但替代选择机制的相对重要性在很大程度上仍不明确。在这里,我们模拟了合作繁殖的基石——延迟扩散和异亲照料——在不同生态场景下的共同进化,同时允许个体调整留居性和帮助水平。我们的结果表明:(i)群体带来的直接适合度益处是留居性进化的主要驱动力;(ii)亲缘选择主要促成了异亲照料的出现,但在恶劣环境中,群体扩张也可能是一个充分的促进因素;(iii)留居性和异亲照料的共同进化受到正反馈的影响;(iv)年龄依赖性扩散由群体益处和亲缘关系共同触发。模型预测得到了实证数据的支持,并为因果关系的比较分析和实验测试提供了良好的机会。