Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of superficial parotidectomy versus extracapsular dissection of the parotid gland: a single-centre retrospective study of 161 patients.

Improvements in preoperative diagnostics and intraoperative techniques have made the surgical excision of benign parotid gland tumours less invasive. Extracapsular dissection (ECD) has become more popular in comparison to superficial parotidectomy (SP), the gold standard. Although clinical outcomes have been reported, reports on cost-effectiveness are limited. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the surgical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of ECD versus SP in benign parotid tumour surgery. A retrospective cohort of 161 patients treated between 2012 and 2020 was collected. Data concerning demographics, clinical outcomes, and cost-efficiency were recorded. Analysis of the 161 unilateral parotidectomy cases (59 SP, 102 ECD) showed a significantly longer operation time, anaesthesia time, and length of stay for SP patients (all P < 0.001). Regarding postoperative complications, transient facial nerve weakness (P < 0.001) and haematoma formation (P = 0.016) were more prevalent in the SP patients. The frequency of positive margins was lower for SP (P = 0.037). No case of recurrence was identified with either technique. ECD showed excellent clinical outcomes as well as a reduction in complications when compared to SP. ECD is a viable alternative for superficial benign parotid gland tumours after thorough preoperative clinical, pathological, and radiological examination. The reduction in operation, anaesthesia, and hospitalization times with ECD is likely to result in a gain in cost-effectiveness.