Univ. Lille, Univ. Artois, Univ. Littoral Côte d'Opale, ULR 7369-URePSSS-Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport Santé Société, 59000 Lille, France.
Unité de Recherche 1342, Faculté des Sciences du Sport de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, 67081 Strasbourg, France.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 19;19(10):6180. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106180.
Children between the ages of 4-6 years represent the population most affected by drowning accidents, while their early involvement in physical activity, and more specifically in aquatic activities is a key factor in their future physical life journey. The systematic review's purpose was to identify aspects in the intervention's studies with children and/or their parents that had a significant impact on the Aquatic Literacy (AL) dimensions mentioned as motor, psychological, affective, and cognitive. The PICO method was used to define the research question and PRISMA checklist searched for articles in nine databases: Cochrane, Embase, ERIC, ProQuest, PsychInfo, PubMed, Scopus, SportDiscus, and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria were: (1) English language, (2) primary research, (3) population of 4-6 year old children or their parents, (4) intervention study design, and (5) results related to at least one of the AL domains. The strength of evidence and the risk of bias were assessed. Results showed relatively poor number of studies for such a vulnerable population regarding the drowning risk ( = 8 for parents and = 14 for children intervention). Studies did not show a consensus on which educational approach was more beneficial than others. Concerning parental education, results were rather homogeneous, especially concerning the theoretical frameworks employed and the relevancy to include parents in swimming programs. The development of pedagogical tools for promotion and evaluation, based on the AL theoretical framework, could help to clarify the question of "how to teach" children to prevent drowning and engage young children in long-term physical activities.
4-6 岁儿童是溺水事故的高发人群,他们早期参与体育活动,特别是水上活动,是他们未来体育生涯的关键因素。本系统评价旨在确定干预儿童及其家长的研究中对运动、心理、情感和认知等方面的水上运动素养(AL)有重要影响的方面。采用 PICO 方法来定义研究问题,PRISMA 清单在九个数据库中搜索文章:Cochrane、Embase、ERIC、ProQuest、PsychInfo、PubMed、Scopus、SportDiscus 和 Web of Science。纳入标准为:(1)英语,(2)原始研究,(3)4-6 岁儿童或其家长人群,(4)干预研究设计,(5)与至少一个 AL 领域相关的结果。评估证据的强度和偏倚风险。结果显示,对于如此易受溺水风险影响的脆弱人群,研究数量相对较少(=8 项针对父母,=14 项针对儿童干预)。研究并未就哪种教育方法比其他方法更有益达成共识。关于家长教育,结果相当一致,尤其是在使用的理论框架和将家长纳入游泳项目的相关性方面。基于 AL 理论框架开发推广和评估的教学工具,有助于阐明“如何教”儿童预防溺水和让幼儿参与长期体育活动的问题。