Suppr超能文献

美国样本中的社会经济地位与基因检测兴趣

Socioeconomic Status and Interest in Genetic Testing in a US-Based Sample.

作者信息

Dusic E J, Bowen Deborah J, Bennett Robin, Cain Kevin C, Theoryn Tesla, Velasquez Mariebeth, Swisher Elizabeth, Brant Jeannine M, Shirts Brian, Wang Catharine

机构信息

Institute of Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.

Department of Bioethics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 10;10(5):880. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050880.

Abstract

Cancer is a significant burden, particularly to individuals of low socioeconomic status (SES). Genetic testing can provide information about an individual's risk of developing cancer and guide future screening and preventative services. However, there are significant financial barriers, particularly for individuals of low SES. This study used the Early Detection of Genetic Risk (EDGE) Study's patient baseline survey ( = 2329) to evaluate the relationship between socioeconomic status and interest in pursuing hereditary cancer genetic testing. Analysis was completed for two interest outcomes-overall interest in genetic testing and interest in genetic testing if the test were free or low cost. Many demographic and SES variables were predictors for interest in genetic testing, including education, income, and MacArthur Subjective Social Scale (SSS). After controlling for the healthcare system, age, and gender, having a higher education level and a higher household income were associated with greater general interest. Lower SSS was associated with greater interest in genetic testing if the test was free or low cost. If genetic testing is the future of preventative medicine, more work needs to be performed to make this option accessible to low-SES groups and to ensure that those services are used by the most underserved populations.

摘要

癌症是一项重大负担,对社会经济地位较低(SES)的个体而言尤甚。基因检测能够提供有关个体患癌风险的信息,并指导未来的筛查和预防服务。然而,存在重大的经济障碍,特别是对于社会经济地位较低的个体。本研究利用遗传风险早期检测(EDGE)研究的患者基线调查(n = 2329)来评估社会经济地位与进行遗传性癌症基因检测兴趣之间的关系。针对两个兴趣结果进行了分析——对基因检测的总体兴趣以及如果检测免费或低成本时对基因检测的兴趣。许多人口统计学和社会经济地位变量是基因检测兴趣的预测因素,包括教育程度、收入和麦克阿瑟主观社会量表(SSS)。在控制了医疗保健系统、年龄和性别之后,较高的教育水平和较高的家庭收入与更高的总体兴趣相关。较低的SSS与如果检测免费或低成本时对基因检测的更大兴趣相关。如果基因检测是预防医学的未来,就需要开展更多工作,以使社会经济地位较低的群体能够获得这一选择,并确保那些服务被最缺乏服务的人群所利用。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic Status and Interest in Genetic Testing in a US-Based Sample.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 10;10(5):880. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050880.
4
5
Subjective socioeconomic status: an alternative to objective socioeconomic status.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01890-z.
7
Socioeconomic status and depressive symptoms and suicidality: The role of subjective social status.
J Affect Disord. 2023 Apr 1;326:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.078. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
8
Maternal subjective social standing is related to inflammation during pregnancy.
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Aug;88:711-717. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.023. Epub 2020 May 7.
9
Association of subjective social status with epigenetic aging among Black and White women.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022 Jul;141:105748. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105748. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
10
Does Low Subjective Social Status Predict Cognitive Decline in Chinese Older Adults? A 4-Year Longitudinal Study From Hong Kong.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;29(11):1140-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.01.014. Epub 2021 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The Art and Science of Genetic Counseling in Nephrology.
Kidney360. 2025 Apr 23;6(7):1230-1244. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000825.
3
Women's preferences for testing to predict breast cancer risk - a discrete choice experiment.
J Transl Med. 2025 Jan 21;23(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06119-9.
4
BRCA genetic testing and counseling in breast cancer: how do we meet our patients' needs?
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024 Sep 5;10(1):77. doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00686-8.
5
Intersectionality, Genetic Testing, and Intrafamilial Communication of Risk: A Qualitative Study.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 2;16(9):1766. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091766.
7
Diversity of thought: public perceptions of genetic testing across ethnic groups in the UK.
J Hum Genet. 2024 Jan;69(1):19-25. doi: 10.1038/s10038-023-01199-1. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
9
Patient perspectives on testing for clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential.
Blood Adv. 2022 Dec 27;6(24):6151-6161. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008376.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer genetic testing in marginalized groups during an era of evolving healthcare reform.
J Cancer Policy. 2021 Jun;28:100275. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100275. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
Intersectionality in cancer care: A systematic review of current research and future directions.
Psychooncology. 2022 May;31(5):705-716. doi: 10.1002/pon.5890. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
3
Socio-Economic Inequalities in Lung Cancer Outcomes: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 13;14(2):398. doi: 10.3390/cancers14020398.
4
Genetic Counseling and Testing in African American Patients With Breast Cancer: A Nationwide Survey of US Breast Oncologists.
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 20;39(36):4020-4028. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01426. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
5
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Premature Cancer Mortality Among U.S. Counties During 1999 to 2018.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Jul;30(7):1375-1386. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1534. Epub 2021 May 4.
6
Design of a study to implement population-based risk assessment for hereditary cancer genetic testing in primary care.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Feb;101:106257. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106257. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
8
Financial barriers in a county genetics clinic: Problems and solutions.
J Genet Couns. 2020 Aug;29(4):678-688. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1279. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
9
Causes of Socioeconomic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer and Intervention Framework and Strategies.
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(2):354-367. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.029. Epub 2019 Nov 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验