Park Chan-Hee, Lim Min-Gyu, Jung Hyunwoo, Jeong Jae-Gyeong, Park Seong-Hyun, Kim Ae-Ryoung, Jung Tae-Du
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 41944, Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2022 May 23;11(10):2942. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102942.
The treatment options for basal ganglia intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), either surgical or conservative, remain controversial. A previous study developed "A new modified ICH (MICH) score" that suggests which treatment option will be better for basal ganglia ICH. According to this scoring system, a MICH score of 0 or 1 indicates that conservative treatment is better than surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether conservative treatment is still a better option for a basal ganglia hemorrhage in patients with MICH scores of 0 and 1, with initial poor motor grades. This retrospective study was comprised of 41 patients with a spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage. These patient groups had no previous brain lesions, their initial MICH score was 0 or 1, and the manual muscle test (MMT) of their hand was grade 2+ or lower in the initial evaluation. All patients were transferred to the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and received rehabilitation treatment. Ten patients had an operative intervention, which was burr-hole aspiration or craniotomy with hematoma removal. The control group included 31 patients who underwent conservative treatment. Outcome evaluations used the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Brunnstrom recovery stage (BRS) which were evaluated at initial and regular follow-ups after 1, 3, and 6 months. We defined an improvement state if the BRS of their hand became 4 or more in 6 months, which means an escape from the synergic pattern. Demographic characteristics showed no significant differences in age, sex, hemiplegic side, initial GCS score, presence of IVH and hydrocephalus, or distribution of MICH scores 0 and 1. There was only a significant difference in the distribution of hematoma volume between groups of less than 20 mL and groups from 21 to 50 mL ( = 0.049). There were no significant differences in MBI values in 1 month or improvement of BRS of their hand in 6 months between the two groups. Even in the group classified as predominantly conservative in basal ganglia hemorrhage patients, if the initial muscle strength is low, it is necessary to reconsider whether conservative treatment is superior to surgical treatment in terms of functional improvement.
基底节区脑出血(ICH)的治疗选择,无论是手术治疗还是保守治疗,仍存在争议。先前的一项研究制定了“一种新的改良脑出血(MICH)评分”,该评分表明哪种治疗选择对基底节区脑出血更有利。根据这个评分系统,MICH评分为0或1表明保守治疗优于手术治疗。本研究的目的是确定对于初始运动分级较差、MICH评分为0和1的基底节区脑出血患者,保守治疗是否仍然是更好的选择。这项回顾性研究纳入了41例自发性基底节区脑出血患者。这些患者组既往无脑部病变,初始MICH评分为0或1,且初始评估时手部徒手肌力测试(MMT)为2+级或更低。所有患者均转入康复医学科并接受康复治疗。10例患者接受了手术干预,即钻孔抽吸或开颅血肿清除术。对照组包括31例接受保守治疗的患者。结局评估采用伯格平衡量表(BBS)、改良巴氏指数(MBI)和Brunnstrom恢复阶段(BRS),在初始时以及1、3和6个月后的定期随访时进行评估。如果患者手部的BRS在6个月内达到4级或更高,即摆脱协同运动模式,我们将其定义为改善状态。人口统计学特征显示,在年龄、性别、偏瘫侧、初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、是否存在脑室出血(IVH)和脑积水,或MICH评分0和1的分布方面,两组之间无显著差异。血肿体积小于20 mL的组与21至50 mL的组之间,仅在血肿体积分布上存在显著差异(P = 0.049)。两组之间在1个月时的MBI值或6个月时手部BRS的改善情况方面无显著差异。即使在基底节区脑出血患者中以保守治疗为主的组中,如果初始肌力较低,就有必要重新考虑在功能改善方面保守治疗是否优于手术治疗。