• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基底节区少量自发性脑出血患者的传统开颅手术与保守治疗对比

Conventional craniotomy versus conservative treatment in patients with minor spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglia.

作者信息

Wang Ning, Lin Weiwei, Zhu Xuanhao, Tu Qi, Zhu Daqian, Qu Shuai, Yang Jianjing, Ruan Linhui, Zhuge Qichuan

机构信息

Brain Center, Affiliated Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310000, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Chin Neurosurg J. 2022 Aug 19;8(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41016-022-00288-y.

DOI:10.1186/s41016-022-00288-y
PMID:35986426
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9389702/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is still controversial, especially for hematomas in the basal ganglia. A retrospective case-control study with propensity score matching was performed to compare the outcomes of conventional craniotomy and conservative treatment for patients with minor ICH in the basal ganglia.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the data of consecutive patients with minor basal ganglia hemorrhage from January 2018 to August 2019. We compared clinical outcomes of two groups using propensity score matching. The extended Glasgow outcome scale obtained by phone interviews based on questionnaires at a 12-month follow-up was used as the primary outcome measure. According to a previous prognosis algorithm, patients were divided into good and poor prognosis groups to obtain a dichotomized (favorable or unfavorable) outcome as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included hospitalized complications, mortality, and modified Rankin score at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients were analyzed, and the baseline characteristics of patients in the surgery and conservative treatment groups were well matched. The primary favorable outcome at 12 months was significantly higher in the conservative treatment group than in the surgery group (81% vs 44%; OR 1.833, 95% CI 1.159-2.900; P=0.005). The incidence of pneumonia in the surgery group was significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group (P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

It is not recommended to undertake conventional craniotomy for patients with a minor hematoma (25-40 ml) in the basal ganglia. An open craniotomy might induce worse long-term functional outcomes than the conservative treatment.

摘要

背景

自发性脑出血(ICH)的治疗仍存在争议,尤其是基底节区血肿。进行了一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性病例对照研究,以比较基底节区轻度ICH患者常规开颅手术和保守治疗的效果。

方法

我们回顾性收集了2018年1月至2019年8月连续的基底节区轻度出血患者的数据。我们使用倾向评分匹配比较两组的临床结果。以12个月随访时基于问卷通过电话访谈获得的扩展格拉斯哥预后量表作为主要结局指标。根据先前的预后算法,将患者分为预后良好和预后不良组,以获得二分法(有利或不利)结局作为主要结局。次要结局包括住院并发症、死亡率和12个月时的改良Rankin评分。

结果

共分析了54例患者,手术组和保守治疗组患者的基线特征匹配良好。保守治疗组12个月时的主要有利结局显著高于手术组(81%对44%;OR 1.833,95%CI 1.159-2.900;P=0.005)。手术组肺炎发生率显著高于保守治疗组(P=0.005)。

结论

不建议对基底节区小血肿(25-40 ml)患者进行常规开颅手术。与保守治疗相比,开颅手术可能导致更差的长期功能结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe28/9389702/b232d5addd4a/41016_2022_288_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe28/9389702/ed02a6684f6f/41016_2022_288_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe28/9389702/b232d5addd4a/41016_2022_288_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe28/9389702/ed02a6684f6f/41016_2022_288_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe28/9389702/b232d5addd4a/41016_2022_288_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Conventional craniotomy versus conservative treatment in patients with minor spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglia.基底节区少量自发性脑出血患者的传统开颅手术与保守治疗对比
Chin Neurosurg J. 2022 Aug 19;8(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41016-022-00288-y.
2
Stereotactic Catheter Drainage Versus Conventional Craniotomy for Severe Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the Basal Ganglia.立体定向导管引流与常规开颅术治疗基底节区严重自发性脑出血的比较。
Cell Transplant. 2019 Aug;28(8):1025-1032. doi: 10.1177/0963689719852302. Epub 2019 May 27.
3
Comparison of endoscopic and open surgery in life-threatening large spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: A propensity-matched analysis.内镜手术与开颅手术治疗危及生命的特发性幕上大脑大量出血的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Stroke. 2023 Jun;18(5):569-577. doi: 10.1177/17474930221130892. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
4
Is Conservative Treatment Better than Surgical Treatment for Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage in a Conventionally Non-Surgical Indication Group with Poor Motor Function?对于运动功能较差的传统非手术适应症组基底节区脑出血患者,保守治疗是否优于手术治疗?
J Clin Med. 2022 May 23;11(10):2942. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102942.
5
Hematoma evacuation based on active strategies versus conservative treatment in the management of moderate basal ganglia hemorrhage: A retrospective study.基于积极策略的血肿清除术与保守治疗在中度基底节区脑出血管理中的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Transl Neurosci. 2023 Jul 29;14(1):20220292. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2022-0292. eCollection 2023 Jan 1.
6
Comparison of endoscopic evacuation, craniotomy, and puncture aspiration for the treatment of spontaneous basal ganglia intracerebral hematoma.内镜清除术、开颅术和穿刺抽吸术治疗自发性基底节区脑出血的比较。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023 Oct;233:107957. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107957. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
7
Surgical Management of Moderate Basal Ganglia Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Surgery, Minimally Invasive Puncture and Drainage, and Craniotomy.中度基底节区脑出血的外科治疗:内镜手术、微创穿刺引流术和开颅手术安全性与疗效的比较
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e995-e1001. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.192. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
8
Long-term outcome of stereotactic aspiration, endoscopic evacuation, and open craniotomy for the treatment of spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage: a propensity score study of 703 cases.立体定向抽吸、内镜下血肿清除术及开颅手术治疗自发性基底节区脑出血的长期预后:一项703例的倾向评分研究
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Aug;9(16):1289. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1612.
9
Extensive basal ganglia hematomas treated by local thrombolysis versus conservative management - a comparative retrospective analysis.局部溶栓治疗与保守治疗大面积基底节区血肿的比较性回顾分析
Br J Neurosurg. 2016 Aug;30(4):401-6. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2016.1161168. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
10
Feasibility Study of Endoscopic Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Large Hematoma: a Comparison with Craniotomy Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis.内镜手术治疗自发性脑内大血肿的可行性研究:使用倾向评分匹配分析与开颅手术的比较
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr;42(2):512-520. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02085-0. Epub 2024 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining the optimal hematoma volume-based thresholds for surgical and medical strategies in basal ganglia hemorrhage.确定基底节区出血手术和内科治疗策略基于血肿体积的最佳阈值。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Feb 20;48(1):255. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03403-6.
2
Risk factors and a prediction model for the prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage using cerebral microhemorrhage and clinical factors.利用脑微出血和临床因素预测脑出血预后的危险因素及预测模型
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1268627. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1268627. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Surgical Treatments for Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage and Imaging Factors Affecting Hematoma Evacuation Rate by Neuroendoscopic Surgery.基底节区脑出血手术治疗的有效性及神经内镜手术影响血肿清除率的影像因素
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2020 Mar;81(2):155-162. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1698523. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
2
Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery for supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a comparison with craniotomy.内镜手术治疗幕上高血压性脑出血的效果:与开颅术的比较。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):553-559. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS161589. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
3
Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.
自发性脑出血管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国中风协会医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2015 Jul;46(7):2032-60. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000069. Epub 2015 May 28.
4
Endoscopic evacuation of basal ganglia hemorrhage via keyhole approach using an adjustable cannula in comparison with craniotomy.与开颅手术相比,使用可调节套管经锁孔入路进行内镜下基底节区脑出血清除术。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:898762. doi: 10.1155/2014/898762. Epub 2014 May 18.
5
Surgical trials in intracerebral hemorrhage.脑出血的外科试验。
Stroke. 2013 Jun;44(6 Suppl 1):S79-82. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001494.
6
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage and the challenge of surgical decision making: a review.自发性脑出血和手术决策的挑战:综述。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 May;34(5):E1. doi: 10.3171/2013.2.FOCUS1319.
7
Minimally invasive surgery plus recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation decreases perihematomal edema.微创手术联合重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂清除脑出血可减少血肿周围水肿。
Stroke. 2013 Mar;44(3):627-34. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000411. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
8
Intracerebral haemorrhage: mechanisms of injury and therapeutic targets.脑出血:损伤机制和治疗靶点。
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Aug;11(8):720-31. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70104-7. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
9
Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis.根据年龄、性别和种族,随时间推移的脑出血发病率、病死率和功能结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Feb;9(2):167-76. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70340-0. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
10
Minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy vs. conservative treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: results from a randomized clinical trial in China.微创颅骨穿刺治疗与保守治疗自发性脑出血的比较:中国一项随机临床试验的结果
Int J Stroke. 2009 Feb;4(1):11-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00239.x.