• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于积极策略的血肿清除术与保守治疗在中度基底节区脑出血管理中的比较:一项回顾性研究。

Hematoma evacuation based on active strategies versus conservative treatment in the management of moderate basal ganglia hemorrhage: A retrospective study.

作者信息

Zhang Weihua, Zhang Jian, Huang Gaoming, Yang Kaichuang

机构信息

Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, The First People's Hospital of Aksu Region, Aksu, Xinjiang, China.

出版信息

Transl Neurosci. 2023 Jul 29;14(1):20220292. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2022-0292. eCollection 2023 Jan 1.

DOI:10.1515/tnsci-2022-0292
PMID:37529168
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10388134/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The internal capsule of the basal ganglia is vulnerable to direct pressure from the hematoma and to secondary damage from toxic products of hemorrhage. Our study evaluated the risk and benefits of active strategies including ultra-early surgery and hematoma evacuation through a transsylvian-transinsular approach for moderate basal ganglia hemorrhage.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected patients with moderate basal ganglia hemorrhage in two hospitals. The conservative group contained 51 patients who had the best medical treatment, and the surgery group contained 36 patients who were treated with hematoma evacuation through a transsylvian-transinsular approach within 6 h from ictus. Motor function of upper and lower limbs recorded with the motor sub-score of NIHSS (m-NIHSS) at the baseline, 7 days, 30 days, and 90 days, the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and Barthel Index (BI) scores at 30 and 90 days were compared between the two groups. Good recovery was defined as an m-NIHSS of 0-2 and poor recovery as 3-4. Favorable prognosis was defined as an mRS of 0-3 and unfavorable prognosis as 4-5.

RESULTS

The mean time from ictus to surgery was 250.3 ± 57.3 min. The good recovery proportions of upper and lower limbs in the surgery group were significantly higher than that in the conservative group ( < 0.05) at 7 days after hemorrhage. The good recovery proportion of upper limbs was significantly higher in the surgery group than in the conservative group ( < 0.05) at 3 months after hemorrhage. Living ability using BI scores was significantly higher in the surgery group than the conservative group ( < 0.05) at 3 months after hemorrhage. The favorable prognosis proportion had no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 3 months after hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultra-early hematoma evacuation through a transsylvian-transinsular approach are active strategies for moderate basal ganglia hemorrhage and have potential advantages in improving motor function recovery and daily living. The postoperative rebleeding rate does not increase simultaneously.

摘要

目的

基底节区的内囊易受血肿直接压迫及出血毒性产物的继发性损伤。我们的研究评估了包括超早期手术及经外侧裂-岛叶入路血肿清除术等积极策略治疗中度基底节区出血的风险与益处。

方法

我们回顾性收集了两家医院中度基底节区出血的患者。保守治疗组有51例接受了最佳药物治疗的患者,手术组有36例在发病6小时内接受经外侧裂-岛叶入路血肿清除术治疗的患者。比较两组患者在基线、7天、30天和90天时采用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)运动分项评分(m-NIHSS)记录的上下肢运动功能,以及在30天和90天时的改良Rankin量表(mRS)和Barthel指数(BI)评分。良好恢复定义为m-NIHSS为0-2分,恢复不佳定义为3-4分。预后良好定义为mRS为0-3分,预后不良定义为4-5分。

结果

发病至手术的平均时间为250.3±57.3分钟。出血后7天,手术组上下肢良好恢复比例显著高于保守治疗组(P<0.05)。出血后3个月,手术组上肢良好恢复比例显著高于保守治疗组(P<0.05)。出血后3个月,手术组使用BI评分的生活能力显著高于保守治疗组(P<0.05)。出血后3个月,两组预后良好比例无统计学差异。

结论

经外侧裂-岛叶入路超早期血肿清除术是治疗中度基底节区出血的积极策略,在改善运动功能恢复和日常生活方面具有潜在优势。术后再出血率并未同时增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddf1/10388134/90098358b5ec/j_tnsci-2022-0292-fig002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddf1/10388134/4b0fef94726a/j_tnsci-2022-0292-fig001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddf1/10388134/90098358b5ec/j_tnsci-2022-0292-fig002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddf1/10388134/4b0fef94726a/j_tnsci-2022-0292-fig001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddf1/10388134/90098358b5ec/j_tnsci-2022-0292-fig002.jpg

相似文献

1
Hematoma evacuation based on active strategies versus conservative treatment in the management of moderate basal ganglia hemorrhage: A retrospective study.基于积极策略的血肿清除术与保守治疗在中度基底节区脑出血管理中的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Transl Neurosci. 2023 Jul 29;14(1):20220292. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2022-0292. eCollection 2023 Jan 1.
2
Transsylvian-transinsular approach for the removal of basal ganglia hemorrhage under a Modified Intracerebral Hemorrhage score.改良脑出血评分下经侧裂-经岛叶入路清除基底节区脑出血
J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Jul;24(4):1388-92. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318292c302.
3
Comparison between transsylvian-transinsular and transcortical-transtemporal approach for evacuation of intracerebral hematoma.经外侧裂-岛叶入路与经皮质-颞下入路清除脑内血肿的比较。
Acta Cir Bras. 2013 Feb;28(2):112-8. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502013000200005.
4
Large traumatic basal ganglia hematoma: surgical treatment versus conservative management.巨大外伤性基底节血肿:手术治疗与保守治疗的比较。
J Neurosurg Sci. 2020 Apr;64(2):154-157. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03830-3. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
5
Transsylvian-Transinsular Approach for Deep-Seated Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage: An Experience at a Single Institution.经侧裂-经岛叶入路治疗基底节区深部脑出血:单中心经验
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2015 Jun;17(2):85-92. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2015.17.2.85. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
6
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes and Recovery of Neurologic and Linguistic Functions in the Dominant Hemisphere After Basal Ganglia Hematoma Evacuation by Craniotomy versus Endoscopy.经颅手术与内镜手术治疗基底节血肿:对比术后优势半球神经和语言功能恢复的手术效果和康复情况。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Sep;129:e494-e501. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.193. Epub 2019 May 29.
7
Borderline basal ganglia hemorrhage volume: patient selection for good clinical outcome after stereotactic catheter drainage.边缘基底节区脑出血量:立体定向导管引流后良好临床转归的患者选择。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;125(5):1242-1248. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.JNS151643. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
8
A Retrospective Cohort Study of Neuroendoscopic Surgery versus Traditional Craniotomy on Surgical Success Rate, Postoperative Complications, and Prognosis in Patients with Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.一项回顾性队列研究,比较神经内镜手术与传统开颅手术治疗急性脑出血的手术成功率、术后并发症和预后。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 5;2022:2650795. doi: 10.1155/2022/2650795. eCollection 2022.
9
The Application Effect of Craniotomy through Transsylvian Rolandic Point-Insular Approach on Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Posterior Basal Ganglia.经岛叶颞中回入路开颅术治疗基底节后部高血压脑出血的应用效果。
Behav Neurol. 2023 Nov 29;2023:2266691. doi: 10.1155/2023/2266691. eCollection 2023.
10
The effects on prognosis of surgical treatment of hypertensive putaminal hematomas through transsylvian transinsular approach.经外侧裂-岛叶入路手术治疗高血压性壳核血肿对预后的影响。
Surg Neurol. 2003 Mar;59(3):176-83; discussion 183. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(02)01043-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the evolution of the immune landscape during perihematomal edema progression after intracerebral hemorrhage.单细胞 RNA 测序揭示了脑出血后血肿周围水肿进展过程中免疫景观的演变。
J Neuroinflammation. 2024 May 28;21(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12974-024-03113-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of different operation time on surgical effect and quality of life in patients with severe hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.不同手术时间对重症高血压性脑出血患者手术效果及生活质量的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Aug 15;13(8):9538-9545. eCollection 2021.
2
Including Distal Motor Function within the NIHSS: Correlation with Motor Arm Function and IV rt-PA Treatment Response.将 NIHSS 纳入远端运动功能:与运动手臂功能和 IV rt-PA 治疗反应的相关性。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Nov;30(11):106046. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106046. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
3
Intracerebral Hemorrhage Volume Reduction and Timing of Intervention Versus Functional Benefit and Survival in the MISTIE III and STICH Trials.
颅内出血体积减少与干预时机对 MISTIE III 和 STICH 试验的功能获益和生存的影响。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Apr 15;88(5):961-970. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa572.
4
Surgical Techniques and Prevention of Complications in the Treatment of Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage Through the Distal Transsylvian Approach.经远外侧经侧裂入路治疗基底节区脑出血的手术技巧及并发症防治
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Jan/Feb;31(1):e27-e30. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005836.
5
Role of surgery in the management of patients with supratentorial spontaneous intracerebral hematoma: Critical appraisal of evidence.手术在幕上自发性脑内血肿患者管理中的作用:证据的批判性评估
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 May;39:35-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.02.022. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
6
Treatment Efficacy of the Transsylvian Approach Versus the Transtemporal Cortex Approach to Evacuate Basal Ganglia Hematoma Under a Microscope.显微镜下经外侧裂入路与经颞叶皮质入路清除基底节区血肿的治疗效果比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Mar;27(2):308-12. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002323.
7
Transsylvian-Transinsular Approach for Deep-Seated Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage: An Experience at a Single Institution.经侧裂-经岛叶入路治疗基底节区深部脑出血:单中心经验
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2015 Jun;17(2):85-92. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2015.17.2.85. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
8
Transsylvian-transinsular approach to large lateral thalamus hemorrhages.经颞叶-经岛叶入路治疗大脑外侧丘脑大型出血。
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Mar;26(2):e98-102. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001323.
9
Longitudinal study of diffusion tensor imaging properties of affected cortical spinal tracts in acute and chronic hemorrhagic stroke.急性和慢性出血性卒中患者受影响皮质脊髓束扩散张量成像特性的纵向研究
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Aug;21(8):1388-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.032. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
10
Comparison between transsylvian-transinsular and transcortical-transtemporal approach for evacuation of intracerebral hematoma.经外侧裂-岛叶入路与经皮质-颞下入路清除脑内血肿的比较。
Acta Cir Bras. 2013 Feb;28(2):112-8. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502013000200005.