Suppr超能文献

与传统旋转器械去除相比,激光辅助预制陶瓷冠脱粘的体外研究。

In Vitro Study of Laser-Assisted Prefabricated Ceramic Crown Debonding as Compared to Traditional Rotary Instrument Removal.

作者信息

Deeb Janina Golob, Crowell Andrew, Richey Kristen H, Bencharit Sompop, Carrico Caroline K, Williams Tiffany L, Grzech-Leśniak Kinga

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 May 18;15(10):3617. doi: 10.3390/ma15103617.

Abstract

This study compared the laser and rotary removals of prefabricated zirconia crowns in primary anterior and permanent posterior teeth. Sixty-two extracted teeth were prepared for prefabricated zirconia crowns cemented with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Specimens underwent crown removals by a rotary handpiece, or erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser. Pulpal temperatures, removal times, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examinations were compared. The average crown removal time for rotary and laser methods was 80.9 ± 19.36 s and 353.3 ± 110.6 s, respectively, for anterior primary teeth; and 114.2 ± 32.1 s and 288.5 ± 76.1 s, respectively, for posterior teeth (p < 0.001). The maximum temperature for the rotary and laser groups was 22.2 ± 8.5 °C and 27.7 ± 1.6 °C for anterior teeth, respectively (p < 0.001); and 21.8 ± 0.77 °C and 25.8 ± 0.85 °C for the posterior teeth, respectively (p < 0.001). More open dentinal tubules appeared in the rotary than the laser group. The rotary handpiece removal method may be more efficient than the laser with lower pulpal temperature changes. However, the laser method does not create noticeable tooth or crown structural damage compared to the rotary method.

摘要

本研究比较了激光和旋转器械去除乳牙前牙及恒牙后牙预成氧化锆全冠的效果。选取62颗拔除牙,预备后用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘固预成氧化锆全冠。样本分别采用旋转手机或铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石(Er,Cr:YSGG)激光去除全冠。比较了牙髓温度、去除时间以及扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查结果。乳牙前牙采用旋转和激光方法去除全冠的平均时间分别为80.9±19.36秒和353.3±110.6秒;恒牙后牙分别为114.2±32.1秒和288.5±76.1秒(p<0.001)。旋转组和激光组前牙的最高温度分别为22.2±8.5℃和27.7±1.6℃(p<0.001);后牙分别为21.8±0.77℃和25.8±0.85℃(p<0.001)。旋转组比激光组出现更多开放的牙本质小管。旋转手机去除方法可能比激光方法更高效,牙髓温度变化更低。然而,与旋转方法相比,激光方法不会造成明显的牙齿或全冠结构损伤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08c/9143968/120701d9660f/materials-15-03617-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验