Suppr超能文献

评价 Er:YAG 激光和 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光对预成氧化锆冠的去粘接效果。

Evaluation of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation for the debonding of prefabricated zirconia crowns.

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Adv Clin Exp Med. 2021 Jan;30(1):7-15. doi: 10.17219/acem/127686.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reduced tooth structure in the pediatric and adolescent population is frequently restored with prefabricated zirconia crowns. On permanent teeth, these restorations may need to be removed and replaced with permanent restorations.

OBJECTIVES

To explore and compare the use of 2 high-powered erbium lasers for removing prefabricated zirconia crowns from molar teeth as a non-invasive alternative to rotary instruments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-five permanent molars were prepared to dentin and prefabricated all-ceramic zirconia crowns were fitted and cemented with resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) cement. The teeth were randomly assigned into one of the 2 retrieval treatment groups: the erbium-doped yttrium, aluminum and garnet (Er:YAG) laser group (G1; n = 12) or the erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium and garnet laser (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser group (G2; n = 13). The laser operating parameters for the Er:YAG laser were 300 mJ, 15 Hz, 4.5 W, and 50-microsecond pulse duration (SSP mode); for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser, they were 4.5 W, 15 Hz, 20 water/20 air, and 5 W, 15 Hz, 50 water/50 air, and 60-microsecond pulse duration (H mode). The experiment was repeated twice. The surface area and the volume of teeth and crowns were measured and the cement space was calculated. The retrieval time and temperature changes were tested and recorded. The data were analyzed with the t-test. The surfaces of the dentin and the crown from each group were further examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

RESULTS

The average time for crown removal using the Er:YAG laser was 1 min 32.7 s; for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser it was 3 min 13.9 s (p < 0.0001). The mean temperature changes were 1.41 ±1.36°C for the Er:YAG laser and 2.2 ±0.99°C for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser (p = 0.0321). The SEM examination showed no damage or major structural changes caused by treatment with either erbium-family laser.

CONCLUSIONS

Both lasers are effective, non-invasive tools to remove prefabricated zirconia crowns cemented with resin cement and should be considered as viable alternatives to rotary instrumentation.

摘要

背景

在儿科和青少年人群中,减少的牙齿结构通常用预制氧化锆冠修复。在恒牙上,这些修复体可能需要拆除并用永久性修复体代替。

目的

探索和比较两种高功率铒激光器用于去除磨牙预制氧化锆冠作为旋转器械的非侵入性替代方法。

材料和方法

制备 25 颗恒牙至牙本质,并用树脂改性玻璃离子(RMGI)水泥固定预制全陶瓷氧化锆冠。将牙齿随机分为以下 2 个检索治疗组之一:掺铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光组(G1;n = 12)或掺铒、铬钇、钪、镓石榴石激光(Er,Cr:YSGG)激光组(G2;n = 13)。Er:YAG 激光的激光操作参数为 300 mJ、15 Hz、4.5 W 和 50 微秒脉冲持续时间(SSP 模式);对于 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光,它们是 4.5 W、15 Hz、20 水/20 空气和 5 W、15 Hz、50 水/50 空气和 60 微秒脉冲持续时间(H 模式)。实验重复了两次。测量牙齿和牙冠的表面积和体积,并计算水泥间隙。测试并记录检索时间和温度变化。使用 t 检验分析数据。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进一步检查每组牙本质和牙冠的表面。

结果

使用 Er:YAG 激光去除牙冠的平均时间为 1 分 32.7 秒;使用 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光为 3 分 13.9 秒(p <0.0001)。Er:YAG 激光的平均温度变化为 1.41 ±1.36°C,Er,Cr:YSGG 激光为 2.2 ±0.99°C(p = 0.0321)。SEM 检查显示,两种铒族激光处理均未造成损伤或主要结构变化。

结论

两种激光都是去除用树脂粘结剂粘结的预制氧化锆冠的有效、非侵入性工具,应被视为旋转器械的可行替代品。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验