Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Laboratory of Health Sciences and Technologies, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan First University of Settat, Settat 26000, Morocco.
Nutrients. 2022 May 14;14(10):2066. doi: 10.3390/nu14102066.
Several epidemiological studies have analyzed the effects of lifestyle modification on reducing the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM); however, their results remain inconsistent. This umbrella review aims to evaluate the effects of diet and/or physical activity interventions during pregnancy on preventing GDM. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials reporting preventive effects of diet and/or physical activity in reducing the incidence of GDM were included from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane library. Two authors independently assessed the overlapping and quality of the 35 selected reviews using AMSTAR 2. The results, although variable, tend to defend the protective role of diet and physical activity interventions separately and independently of each other in the prevention of GDM. However, the results for the combined interventions show a possible protective effect; however, it is not entirely clear because most of the analyzed meta-analyses tend to approach 1, and heterogeneity cannot be ruled out. Establishing conclusions about the most efficient type of intervention and a dose-effect relationship was not feasible given the low quality of systematic reviews (83% low to critically low) and the variability in reporting interventions. Therefore, more studies with better quality and definition of the interventions are required. The protocol was previously registered in PROSPERO as CRD42021237895.
几项流行病学研究分析了生活方式改变对降低妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)风险的影响;然而,其结果仍不一致。本 umbrella 综述旨在评估妊娠期间饮食和/或体育活动干预对预防 GDM 的效果。从 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆中纳入了系统评价和随机临床试验的荟萃分析,这些研究报告了饮食和/或体育活动干预对降低 GDM 发生率的预防效果。两位作者使用 AMSTAR 2 独立评估了 35 篇选定综述的重叠和质量。结果虽然各不相同,但倾向于分别和独立地捍卫饮食和体育活动干预在预防 GDM 中的保护作用。然而,联合干预的结果显示出可能的保护作用;然而,由于大多数分析的荟萃分析倾向于接近 1,并且不能排除异质性,因此这并不完全清楚。鉴于系统评价的质量低(83%为低至极低级)和干预措施报告的可变性,无法就最有效的干预类型和剂量-效应关系得出结论。因此,需要更多高质量和明确干预措施的研究。该方案先前已在 PROSPERO 中作为 CRD42021237895 进行了注册。