Suppr超能文献

与未接种个体相比,mRNA疫苗和灭活病毒疫苗的SARS-CoV-2核衣壳抗体反应

SARS-CoV-2 Antinucleocapsid Antibody Response of mRNA and Inactivated Virus Vaccines Compared to Unvaccinated Individuals.

作者信息

Qaqish Arwa, Abbas Manal Mohammad, Al-Tamimi Mohammad, Abbas Manal Ahmad, Al-Omari Mariam, Alqassieh Rami

机构信息

Department of Biology and Biotechnology, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan.

Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Apr 20;10(5):643. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050643.

Abstract

Comparative studies of SARS-CoV-2 antinucleocapsid (anti-N) antibody response in the context of inactivated virus vaccines versus natural infection are limited. This study aims to determine and compare the anti-N antibody levels in people vaccinated with Sinopharm’s (Wuhan, China) inactivated virus vaccine in comparison with naturally infected unvaccinated and Pfizer’s spike (S) mRNA-based vaccinated subjects. Two hundred ninety-nine Jordanian adults participated in the study including unvaccinated COVID-19-infected patients (n = 99), Pfizer-vaccinated (n = 100), and Sinopharm-vaccinated recipients (n = 100). Serum samples were assayed for anti-N IgG, anti-N IgM, and anti-S IgG. Sera of 64.6% of naturally infected unvaccinated participants had positive anti-S IgG (median = 36.35 U/mL; range: 0.04−532.5 U/mL) compared to 88% of Pfizer-vaccinated (Manhattan, NY, USA) (median = 26.52 U/mL; range: 0.39−1265 U/mL) and 58% of Sinopharm-vaccinated subjects (median = 14.35 U/mL; range: 0.39−870.17 U/mL). Samples of 60.6% of naturally infected unvaccinated people had positive anti-N IgG (median = 15.03 U/mL; range: 0−265.1 U/mL) compared to 25% of Pfizer-vaccinated (median = 0.02 U/mL; range: 0−68 U/mL) and 48% of Sinopharm-vaccinated subjects (median = 0.8 U/mL; range: 0−146.3 U/mL). Anti-N titers among the three groups were significantly different (p < 0.05). Anti-N IgM antibodies appeared in 23.2% of the naturally infected unvaccinated group (median = 0.29 U/mL; range: 0−15 U/mL) compared to only 9.0% of Pfizer-vaccinated (median = 018 U/mL; range: 0−33 U/mL) and 7.0% of Sinopharm-vaccinated subjects (median = 0.2 U/mL; range: 0−12.02 U/mL). A significant negative correlation was found between anti-S and age for both vaccines and between anti-S and the presence of chronic disease in Sinopharm-vaccinated subjects. A significant positive correlation between anti-N and anti-S titers was found among the three groups. This study shows that the inactivated virus vaccine, Sinopharm, induces an anti-N response that can boost that of natural infection or vice versa. On the other hand, the Pfizer mRNA-based vaccine induces a significantly stronger anti-S Ab response.

摘要

关于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)核衣壳(抗N)抗体反应在灭活病毒疫苗与自然感染情况下的比较研究有限。本研究旨在确定并比较接种中国国药集团(中国武汉)灭活病毒疫苗的人群与未接种疫苗的自然感染人群以及接种辉瑞公司基于刺突(S)蛋白的mRNA疫苗的人群中的抗N抗体水平。299名约旦成年人参与了该研究,包括未接种疫苗的新冠病毒感染患者(n = 99)、接种辉瑞疫苗的人群(n = 100)以及接种国药疫苗的人群(n = 100)。对血清样本检测抗N IgG、抗N IgM和抗S IgG。64.6%未接种疫苗的自然感染参与者血清抗S IgG呈阳性(中位数 = 36.35 U/mL;范围:0.04−532.5 U/mL),相比之下,接种辉瑞疫苗(美国纽约曼哈顿)的人群中有88%(中位数 = 26.52 U/mL;范围:0.39−1265 U/mL),接种国药疫苗的人群中有58%(中位数 = 14.35 U/mL;范围:0.39−870.17 U/mL)。60.6%未接种疫苗的自然感染人群样本抗N IgG呈阳性(中位数 = 15.03 U/mL;范围:0−265.1 U/mL),相比之下,接种辉瑞疫苗的人群中有25%(中位数 = 0.02 U/mL;范围:0−68 U/mL),接种国药疫苗的人群中有48%(中位数 = 0.8 U/mL;范围:

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f39a/9143597/c43094d214d5/vaccines-10-00643-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验