• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用美国电子健康记录数据库识别新冠肺炎患者的算法开发与验证:一项回顾性队列研究

Development and Validation of Algorithms to Identify COVID-19 Patients Using a US Electronic Health Records Database: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Brown Carolyn A, Londhe Ajit A, He Fang, Cheng Alvan, Ma Junjie, Zhang Jie, Brooks Corinne G, Sprafka J Michael, Roehl Kimberly A, Carlson Katherine B, Page John H

机构信息

Center for Observational Research, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Woodford Research Associates, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol. 2022 May 23;14:699-709. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S355086. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S355086
PMID:35633659
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9139367/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In order to identify and evaluate candidate algorithms to detect COVID-19 cases in an electronic health record (EHR) database, this study examined and compared the utilization of acute respiratory disease codes from February to August 2020 versus the corresponding time period in the 3 years preceding.

METHODS

De-identified EHR data were used to identify codes of interest for candidate algorithms to identify COVID-19 patients. The number and proportion of patients who received a SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) within ±10 days of the occurrence of the diagnosis code and patients who tested positive among those with a test result were calculated, resulting in 11 candidate algorithms. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios assessed the candidate algorithms by clinical setting and time period. We adjusted for potential verification bias by weighting by the reciprocal of the estimated probability of verification.

RESULTS

From January to March 2020, the most commonly used diagnosis codes related to COVID-19 diagnosis were R06 (dyspnea) and R05 (cough). On or after April 1, 2020, the code with highest sensitivity for COVID-19, U07.1, had near perfect adjusted sensitivity (1.00 [95% CI 1.00, 1.00]) but low adjusted specificity (0.32 [95% CI 0.31, 0.33]) in hospitalized patients.

DISCUSSION

Algorithms based on the U07.1 code had high sensitivity among hospitalized patients, but low specificity, especially after April 2020. None of the combinations of ICD-10-CM codes assessed performed with a satisfactory combination of high sensitivity and high specificity when using the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR as the reference standard.

摘要

引言

为了识别和评估用于在电子健康记录(EHR)数据库中检测新冠肺炎病例的候选算法,本研究检查并比较了2020年2月至8月与前三年相应时间段内急性呼吸道疾病代码的使用情况。

方法

使用去识别化的EHR数据来确定候选算法识别新冠肺炎患者的感兴趣代码。计算在诊断代码出现前后±10天内接受严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测的患者数量和比例,以及检测结果呈阳性的患者在接受检测患者中的比例,从而得出11种候选算法。敏感性、特异性和似然比按临床环境和时间段评估候选算法。我们通过以估计验证概率的倒数加权来调整潜在的验证偏倚。

结果

2020年1月至3月,与新冠肺炎诊断相关的最常用诊断代码是R06(呼吸困难)和R05(咳嗽)。在2020年4月1日或之后,对新冠肺炎敏感性最高的代码U07.1在住院患者中的调整后敏感性接近完美(1.00 [95% CI 1.00, 1.00]),但调整后特异性较低(0.32 [95% CI 0.31, 0.33])。

讨论

基于U07.1代码的算法在住院患者中具有高敏感性,但特异性较低,尤其是在2020年4月之后。当以严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 RT-PCR作为参考标准时,所评估的国际疾病分类第十次修订本临床修订版(ICD-10-CM)代码组合中,没有一个在高敏感性和高特异性的令人满意组合方面表现良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6910/9139367/d6abdb216862/CLEP-14-699-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6910/9139367/2741914de402/CLEP-14-699-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6910/9139367/5c99bd3355d4/CLEP-14-699-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6910/9139367/d6abdb216862/CLEP-14-699-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6910/9139367/2741914de402/CLEP-14-699-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6910/9139367/5c99bd3355d4/CLEP-14-699-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6910/9139367/d6abdb216862/CLEP-14-699-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of Algorithms to Identify COVID-19 Patients Using a US Electronic Health Records Database: A Retrospective Cohort Study.利用美国电子健康记录数据库识别新冠肺炎患者的算法开发与验证:一项回顾性队列研究
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 May 23;14:699-709. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S355086. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision Codes With Electronic Medical Records Among Patients With Symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019.国际疾病分类与相关健康问题第十版与电子病历在以冠状病毒病 2019 症状就诊患者中的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2017703. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17703.
3
Accuracy of Computable Phenotyping Approaches for SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Hospitalizations from the Electronic Health Record.基于电子健康记录的新冠病毒感染和新冠住院可计算表型分析方法的准确性
medRxiv. 2021 May 13:2021.03.16.21253770. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.16.21253770.
4
Validation of diagnosis codes to identify hospitalized COVID-19 patients in health care claims data.验证诊断代码以在医疗保健索赔数据中识别住院的 COVID-19 患者。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Apr;31(4):476-480. doi: 10.1002/pds.5401. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
5
Accuracy of COVID-19-Like Illness Diagnoses in Electronic Health Record Data: Retrospective Cohort Study.电子健康记录数据中新冠病毒样疾病诊断的准确性:回顾性队列研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jan 17;7:e39231. doi: 10.2196/39231.
6
Validity of ICD-10 codes for COVID-19 patients with hospital admissions or ED visits in Canada: a retrospective cohort study.加拿大新冠病毒疾病患者住院或急诊就诊时国际疾病分类第十版编码的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 21;12(1):e057838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057838.
7
Routine laboratory testing to determine if a patient has COVID-19.进行常规实验室检测以确定患者是否感染新冠病毒。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 19;11(11):CD013787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013787.
8
The Development and Validation of Simplified Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Prognosis of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Multicenter, Retrospective Study.中文译文:简化机器学习算法预测 COVID-19 住院患者预后的开发和验证:多中心回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 21;24(1):e31549. doi: 10.2196/31549.
9
Validity of hospital diagnostic codes to identify SARS-CoV-2 infections in reference to polymerase chain reaction results: a descriptive study.参照聚合酶链反应结果,医院诊断编码识别新型冠状病毒2019感染的有效性:一项描述性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Oct 24;11(5):E982-E987. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20230033. Print 2023 Sep-Oct.
10
Rule-based and machine learning algorithms identify patients with systemic sclerosis accurately in the electronic health record.基于规则和机器学习算法可在电子健康记录中准确识别系统性硬化症患者。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Dec 30;21(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2092-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Validation Of COVID-19 Information In The Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database of Spain's Public Health System Data by Vaccination Status.西班牙公共卫生系统数据的药物流行病学研究数据库中按疫苗接种状态对新冠病毒疾病信息的验证
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2024 Mar 1;21(1):1i. eCollection 2024 Winter-Spring.
2
Opportunities and Challenges in Using Electronic Health Record Systems to Study Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Insights From the NIH RECOVER Initiative.利用电子健康记录系统研究新冠病毒感染后急性后遗症的机遇与挑战:来自美国国立卫生研究院RECOVER计划的见解
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 5;27:e59217. doi: 10.2196/59217.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A scoping review of the pathophysiology of COVID-19.COVID-19 病理生理学的范围性综述。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2021 Jan-Dec;35:20587384211048026. doi: 10.1177/20587384211048026.
2
Accuracy of ICD-10 Diagnostic Codes to Identify COVID-19 Among Hospitalized Patients.国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)诊断编码在识别住院患者中新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的准确性
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug;36(8):2532-2535. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06936-w. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
3
Bronchoalveolar lavage in suspected COVID-19 cases with a negative nasopharyngeal swab: a retrospective cross-sectional study in a high-impact Northern Italy area.
Clinician Prescribing Practices Involving Medications for Alcohol Use Disorder.
临床医生针对酒精使用障碍开具药物的处方行为。
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Mar;68(3):446-454. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.006. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
4
Biases in Electronic Health Records Data for Generating Real-World Evidence: An Overview.用于生成真实世界证据的电子健康记录数据中的偏差:概述
J Healthc Inform Res. 2023 Nov 14;8(1):121-139. doi: 10.1007/s41666-023-00153-2. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Comments on the Risk of Gout in Patients with Psoriasis [Letter].关于银屑病患者痛风风险的评论[信函]
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jul 15;14:849-850. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S379488. eCollection 2022.
疑似 COVID-19 病例且鼻咽拭子阴性患者行支气管肺泡灌洗:意大利北部一个高影响地区的回顾性横断面研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;16(7):1857-1864. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02714-y. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
4
Analysis of Factors Causing False-Negative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Results in Oropharyngeal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs of Patients With COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者口咽和鼻咽拭子实时聚合酶链反应结果假阴性的影响因素分析
Ear Nose Throat J. 2022 May;101(4):234-238. doi: 10.1177/0145561321996621. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
5
Duration and key determinants of infectious virus shedding in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).COVID-19 住院患者中感染性病毒排出的持续时间和关键决定因素。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 11;12(1):267. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20568-4.
6
Physicians' Dilemma of False-Positive RT-PCR for COVID-19: a Case Report.新冠病毒逆转录聚合酶链反应假阳性结果下医生面临的困境:一例病例报告
SN Compr Clin Med. 2021;3(1):255-258. doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00655-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
7
Uptake and Accuracy of the Diagnosis Code for COVID-19 Among US Hospitalizations.美国住院患者 COVID-19 诊断代码的使用率和准确性。
JAMA. 2020 Dec 22;324(24):2553-2554. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.20323.
8
Comparison of International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision Codes With Electronic Medical Records Among Patients With Symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019.国际疾病分类与相关健康问题第十版与电子病历在以冠状病毒病 2019 症状就诊患者中的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2017703. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17703.
9
Evidence for Limited Early Spread of COVID-19 Within the United States, January-February 2020.美国 2020 年 1 月至 2 月期间 COVID-19 有限度早期传播的证据。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jun 5;69(22):680-684. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6922e1.
10
Overview of COVID-19 testing and implications for otolaryngologists.COVID-19 检测概述及其对耳鼻喉科医生的影响。
Head Neck. 2020 Jul;42(7):1629-1633. doi: 10.1002/hed.26213. Epub 2020 May 12.