• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于磁共振成像的前列腺癌活检前 Gleason 评分预测列线图的验证

Validation of an MRI-based prostate cancer prebiopsy Gleason score predictive nomogram.

作者信息

Lee Adrianna Jiaying, Wnorowski Amelia, Ye Nancy, Xu Linhan, Naslund Michael, Wood Bradford J, Merino Maria J, Turkbey Baris, Choyke Peter L, Pinto Peter A, Siddiqui M Minhaj

机构信息

University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Curr Urol. 2022 Mar;16(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000069. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000069
PMID:35633863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9132180/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gleason score grading is a cornerstone of risk stratification and management of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). In this work, we derive and validate a nomogram that uses prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) and clinical patient characteristics to predict biopsy Gleason scores (bGS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A predictive nomogram was derived from 143 men who underwent MP-MRI prior to any prostate biopsy and then validated on an independent cohort of 235 men from a different institution who underwent MP-MRI for PCa workup. Screen positive lesions were defined as lesions positive on T2W and DWI sequences on MP-MRI. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) density, number of screen positive lesions, and MRI suspicion were associated with PCa Gleason score on biopsy and were used to generate a predictive nomogram. The independent cohort was tested on the nomogram and the most likely bGS was noted.

RESULTS

The mean PSA in the validation cohort was 9.25ng/mL versus 6.8ng/mL in the original cohort ( = 0.001). The distribution of Gleason scores between the 2 cohorts were not significantly different ( = 0.7). In the original cohort of men, the most probable nomogram generated Gleason score agreed with actual pathologic bGS findings in 61% of the men. In the validation cohort, the most likely nomogram predicted bGS agreed with actual pathologic bGS 51% of the time. The nomogram correctly identified any PCa versus non-PCa 63% of the time and clinically significant (Gleason score ≥ 7) PCa 69% of the time. The negative predictive value for clinically significant PCa using this prebiopsy nomogram was 74% in the validation group.

CONCLUSIONS

A preintervention nomogram based on PSA and MRI findings can help narrow down the likely pathologic finding on biopsy. Validation of the nomogram demonstrated a significant ability to correctly identify the most likely bGS. This feasibility study demonstrates the potential of a prebiopsy prediction of bGS and based on the high negative predictive value, identification of men who may not need biopsies, which could impact future risk stratification for PCa.

摘要

背景

Gleason评分分级是前列腺癌(PCa)患者风险分层和管理的基石。在本研究中,我们推导并验证了一种列线图,该列线图使用前列腺多参数磁共振成像(MP-MRI)和临床患者特征来预测活检Gleason评分(bGS)。

材料与方法

从143名在进行任何前列腺活检之前接受MP-MRI检查的男性中推导预测列线图,然后在来自不同机构的235名接受MP-MRI检查以进行PCa评估的男性独立队列中进行验证。筛查阳性病变定义为MP-MRI上T2W和DWI序列呈阳性的病变。前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度、筛查阳性病变数量和MRI可疑程度与活检时的PCa Gleason评分相关,并用于生成预测列线图。对独立队列进行列线图测试并记录最可能的bGS。

结果

验证队列中的平均PSA为9.25ng/mL,而原始队列中的平均PSA为6.8ng/mL(P = 0.001)。两个队列之间Gleason评分的分布没有显著差异(P = 0.7)。在原始男性队列中,列线图生成的最可能Gleason评分与61%男性的实际病理bGS结果一致。在验证队列中,列线图预测的最可能bGS与实际病理bGS在51%的时间内一致。列线图在63%的时间内正确识别了任何PCa与非PCa,在69%的时间内正确识别了具有临床意义(Gleason评分≥7)的PCa。在验证组中,使用该活检前列线图对具有临床意义的PCa的阴性预测值为74%。

结论

基于PSA和MRI结果的干预前列线图有助于缩小活检时可能的病理结果范围。列线图的验证表明其具有正确识别最可能bGS的显著能力。这项可行性研究证明了活检前预测bGS的潜力,并且基于高阴性预测值,可以识别可能不需要活检的男性,这可能会影响未来PCa的风险分层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4795/9132180/e252f6355911/curr-urol-16-38-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4795/9132180/c5990652f50e/curr-urol-16-38-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4795/9132180/69e6b6bd5233/curr-urol-16-38-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4795/9132180/e252f6355911/curr-urol-16-38-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4795/9132180/c5990652f50e/curr-urol-16-38-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4795/9132180/69e6b6bd5233/curr-urol-16-38-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4795/9132180/e252f6355911/curr-urol-16-38-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of an MRI-based prostate cancer prebiopsy Gleason score predictive nomogram.基于磁共振成像的前列腺癌活检前 Gleason 评分预测列线图的验证
Curr Urol. 2022 Mar;16(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000069. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
Clinical Utility of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.多参数磁共振成像阴性在前列腺癌及临床显著前列腺癌诊断中的临床应用价值
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Apr 19;28:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.03.008. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像可疑程度对前列腺癌的检测价值。
J Urol. 2013 Nov;190(5):1721-1727. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.052. Epub 2013 May 29.
4
Nomogram predicting prostate cancer in patients with negative prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance.预测经前列腺穿刺活检前多参数磁共振成像检查为阴性的患者前列腺癌的列线图
Future Oncol. 2022 Apr;18(12):1473-1483. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-1538. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
5
Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.基于前列腺特异性抗原值升高的前列腺癌初诊患者的前列腺癌诊断的活检前多参数磁共振成像:一项随机前瞻性盲法对照试验的结果。
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 May 29.
6
A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer.基于 4K 评分/MRI 的列线图预测前列腺癌、临床显著前列腺癌和不利前列腺癌。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Aug;4(4):e1357. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1357. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
7
Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone.基于多参数磁共振成像开发一种列线图,用于预测高级别前列腺癌,以减少前列腺特异性抗原灰色区域内不必要的活检。
BMC Med Imaging. 2017 Feb 1;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12880-017-0184-x.
8
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌检测与分期中的应用
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).
9
Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.活检前多参数磁共振成像(MRI)、活检指征与MRI-超声融合靶向前列腺活检结果之间的关系
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):512-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
10
PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像测量的PI-RADS v2和前列腺周围脂肪能够预测活检Gleason评分为3+3的前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后病理分级的提升。
Scand J Urol. 2018 Oct-Dec;52(5-6):333-339. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1545799.

本文引用的文献

1
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.MRI 靶向或标准活检用于前列腺癌诊断。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
2
Men's perspectives of prostate cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies.男性对前列腺癌筛查的看法:定性研究的系统评价
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 28;12(11):e0188258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188258. eCollection 2017.
3
Active Surveillance Versus Watchful Waiting for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Model to Inform Decisions.
主动监测与观察等待对局限性前列腺癌的比较:一种辅助决策的模型。
Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):899-907. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.018. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
4
Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone.基于多参数磁共振成像开发一种列线图,用于预测高级别前列腺癌,以减少前列腺特异性抗原灰色区域内不必要的活检。
BMC Med Imaging. 2017 Feb 1;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12880-017-0184-x.
5
Validation of the Kattan Nomogram for Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术后Kattan列线图对前列腺癌复发的验证。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Nov;14(11):1395-1401. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0149.
6
Predicting survival of men with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.预测根治性前列腺切除术后复发性前列腺癌男性的生存率。
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Feb;54:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
7
Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality for Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.预测前列腺癌根治术后生化复发男性前列腺癌特异性死亡率的列线图
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1160-1167. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.019. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
8
Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline.早期前列腺癌检测:AUA 指南。
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.119. Epub 2013 May 6.
9
Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.预后格里森分级分组:基于改良格里森评分系统的数据。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):753-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11611.x. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
10
Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):120-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459.