• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊眩晕患者脑卒中的危险因素及风险模型构建。

Risk Factors and Risk Model Construction of Stroke in Patients with Vertigo in Emergency Department.

机构信息

Jiangsu Food & Pharmaceutical Science College, Huai'an, Jiangsu 223023, China.

Department of Emergency, Huai'an Second People's Hospital, Huai'an, Jiangsu 223001, China.

出版信息

Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 May 20;2022:2968044. doi: 10.1155/2022/2968044. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/2968044
PMID:35633924
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9142295/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore the risk factors of stroke in patients with vertigo in the emergency department and establish a risk prediction model for stroke patients.

METHODS

A total of 301 patients experiencing vertigo in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2021 were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into the stroke group ( = 56) and the nonstroke group ( = 245). The clinical characteristics of patients in both groups were collected and compared, followed by binary logistic regression that was employed to determine the risk factors that affect stroke diagnosis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to clarify the effectiveness of the constructed model.

RESULTS

Patients in the stroke group were older and had higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure on admission than the nonstroke group. Meanwhile, they demonstrated a higher proportion of diabetes and atrial fibrillation and focal muscle weakness, dysarthria, dysphagia, or ataxia in neurological examinations compared to the nonstroke group (all < 0.05). The proportion of patients in the nonstroke group who had a history of vertigo or inner ear disease was significantly higher than that in the stroke group ( < 0.05). The patient's age ≥ 60 years old (OR = 3.57), diabetes (OR = 4.57), atrial fibrillation (OR = 4.26), previous history of vertigo or inner ear disease (OR = 0.16), focal muscle weakness (OR = 4.34), and dysphagia or ataxia (OR = 4.08) were associated with a higher risk of stroke. The area under the curve for stroke was 0.87, and the sensitivity and specificity were 98.2% and 57.6%, respectively, as the sum of the assigned scores was greater than 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Age ≥ 60 years old, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, previous history of vertigo or inner ear disease, focal muscle weakness, dysphagia, or ataxia were associated with a higher risk of stroke. The risk model constructed based on our findings may help to assess the risk of stroke in patients with vertigo in the emergency department.

摘要

目的

旨在探讨急诊科眩晕患者发生脑卒中的危险因素,并建立脑卒中患者的风险预测模型。

方法

回顾性纳入我院 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月期间 301 例眩晕患者,将患者分为脑卒中组(=56 例)和非脑卒中组(=245 例)。收集两组患者的临床特征并进行比较,采用二分类 Logistic 回归分析确定影响脑卒中诊断的危险因素。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来明确构建模型的有效性。

结果

脑卒中组患者年龄较大,入院时收缩压和舒张压均高于非脑卒中组。同时,脑卒中组患者的糖尿病和心房颤动比例以及神经检查中的局灶性肌无力、构音障碍、吞咽困难或共济失调比例均高于非脑卒中组(均<0.05)。非脑卒中组患者中有眩晕或内耳疾病病史的比例明显高于脑卒中组(<0.05)。患者年龄≥60 岁(OR=3.57)、糖尿病(OR=4.57)、心房颤动(OR=4.26)、眩晕或内耳疾病病史(OR=0.16)、局灶性肌无力(OR=4.34)和吞咽困难或共济失调(OR=4.08)与脑卒中风险增加相关。脑卒中的曲线下面积为 0.87,总分>3 分时,灵敏度和特异度分别为 98.2%和 57.6%。

结论

年龄≥60 岁、糖尿病、心房颤动、眩晕或内耳疾病病史、局灶性肌无力、吞咽困难或共济失调与脑卒中风险增加相关。基于本研究结果构建的风险模型可能有助于评估急诊科眩晕患者发生脑卒中的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7776/9142295/b5c8cdc0ef9d/CMMM2022-2968044.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7776/9142295/b5c8cdc0ef9d/CMMM2022-2968044.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7776/9142295/b5c8cdc0ef9d/CMMM2022-2968044.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Factors and Risk Model Construction of Stroke in Patients with Vertigo in Emergency Department.急诊眩晕患者脑卒中的危险因素及风险模型构建。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 May 20;2022:2968044. doi: 10.1155/2022/2968044. eCollection 2022.
2
The TriAGe+ Score for Vertigo or Dizziness: A Diagnostic Model for Stroke in the Emergency Department.用于眩晕或头晕的TriAGe+评分:急诊科卒中的诊断模型
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 May;26(5):1144-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
3
The TriAGe + score for vertigo or dizziness: A validation study in a university hospital emergency department in Hong Kong.TriAGe + 评分用于眩晕或头晕:香港一所大学医院急诊科的验证研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;77:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.10.055. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
4
Risk of future stroke in patients with a diagnosis of peripheral vertigo in the emergency department.急诊科诊断为周围性眩晕的患者未来发生中风的风险。
Eur J Neurol. 2023 Jul;30(7):2062-2069. doi: 10.1111/ene.15543. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
5
Identification of dizzy patients who will develop an acute cerebrovascular syndrome: a descriptive study among emergency department patients.识别可能发展为急性脑血管综合征的头晕患者:急诊科患者中的描述性研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul;275(7):1709-1713. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4988-2. Epub 2018 May 2.
6
Vertigo and stroke: a national database survey.眩晕与中风:全国数据库调查。
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Sep;33(7):1131-5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31826426ee.
7
A Posterior Circulation Ischemia Risk Score System to Assist the Diagnosis of Dizziness.一种用于辅助头晕诊断的后循环缺血风险评分系统。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Feb;27(2):506-512. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
8
Predictors of vertigo in the emergency department: The preved study.急诊科眩晕的预测因素:PREVED研究
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Sep;29(9):105043. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105043. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
9
Diagnostic value of S100B protein in the differential diagnosis of acute vertigo in the emergency department.S100B 蛋白在急诊科急性眩晕鉴别诊断中的诊断价值。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;21(7):736-41. doi: 10.1111/acem.12420.
10
Relation of infarction location and volume to vertigo in vertebrobasilar stroke.脑梗死部位和容积与椎基底动脉系统卒中后眩晕的关系。
Brain Behav. 2020 Mar;10(3):e01564. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1564. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosis of Acute Central Dizziness With Simple Clinical Information Using Machine Learning.利用机器学习通过简单临床信息诊断急性中枢性眩晕
Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 12;12:691057. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.691057. eCollection 2021.
2
Pathophysiology and Treatment of Stroke: Present Status and Future Perspectives.中风的病理生理学和治疗:现状和未来展望。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 15;21(20):7609. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207609.
3
Pathophysiology and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Detected after Ischemic Stroke (PARADISE): A Translational, Integrated, and Transdisciplinary Approach.
缺血性卒中后检测到的心房颤动的病理生理学与风险(PARADISE):一种转化性、综合性和跨学科方法
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Mar;27(3):606-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.09.038. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
4
Atrial Fibrillation: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Outcomes.心房颤动:流行病学、病理生理学及临床结局
Circ Res. 2017 Apr 28;120(9):1501-1517. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.309732.
5
The TriAGe+ Score for Vertigo or Dizziness: A Diagnostic Model for Stroke in the Emergency Department.用于眩晕或头晕的TriAGe+评分:急诊科卒中的诊断模型
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 May;26(5):1144-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
6
Stroke Epidemiology and Risk Factor Management.中风流行病学与风险因素管理
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2017 Feb;23(1, Cerebrovascular Disease):15-39. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000416.
7
Atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke: a nationwide cohort study.心房颤动与中风风险:一项全国性队列研究。
Europace. 2016 Nov;18(11):1689-1697. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv401. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
8
HINTS outperforms ABCD2 to screen for stroke in acute continuous vertigo and dizziness.HINTS 评分优于 ABCD2 评分,用于急性持续性眩晕和头晕患者的脑卒中筛查。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;20(10):986-96. doi: 10.1111/acem.12223.
9
Diagnosing the cause of vertigo: a practical approach.眩晕病因诊断:实用方法。
Hong Kong Med J. 2012 Aug;18(4):327-32.
10
Application of the ABCD2 score to identify cerebrovascular causes of dizziness in the emergency department.应用 ABCD2 评分识别急诊科头晕的脑血管病因。
Stroke. 2012 Jun;43(6):1484-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.646414. Epub 2012 Mar 22.