Beach Sara D, Ozernov-Palchik Ola, May Sidney C, Centanni Tracy M, Perrachione Tyler K, Pantazis Dimitrios, Gabrieli John D E
McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 May 12;16:823627. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.823627. eCollection 2022.
The neural representation of a repeated stimulus is the standard against which a deviant stimulus is measured in the brain, giving rise to the well-known mismatch response. It has been suggested that individuals with dyslexia have poor implicit memory for recently repeated stimuli, such as the train of standards in an oddball paradigm. Here, we examined how the neural representation of a standard emerges over repetitions, asking whether there is less sensitivity to repetition and/or less accrual of "standardness" over successive repetitions in dyslexia. We recorded magnetoencephalography (MEG) as adults with and without dyslexia were passively exposed to speech syllables in a roving-oddball design. We performed time-resolved multivariate decoding of the MEG sensor data to identify the neural signature of standard vs. deviant trials, independent of stimulus differences. This "multivariate mismatch" was equally robust and had a similar time course in the two groups. In both groups, standards generated by as few as two repetitions were distinct from deviants, indicating normal sensitivity to repetition in dyslexia. However, only in the control group did standards become increasingly different from deviants with repetition. These results suggest that many of the mechanisms that give rise to neural adaptation as well as mismatch responses are intact in dyslexia, with the possible exception of a putatively predictive mechanism that successively integrates recent sensory information into feedforward processing.
重复刺激的神经表征是大脑中用于衡量异常刺激的标准,由此产生了著名的失配反应。有研究表明,患有阅读障碍的个体对近期重复刺激的内隐记忆较差,比如在奇偶数范式中的标准刺激序列。在此,我们研究了标准刺激的神经表征是如何在重复过程中出现的,探讨阅读障碍患者在连续重复过程中对重复的敏感性是否较低和/或“标准性”的累积是否较少。我们采用移动奇偶数设计,让患有和未患有阅读障碍的成年人被动听语音音节,并记录他们的脑磁图(MEG)。我们对MEG传感器数据进行时间分辨多变量解码,以识别标准试验与异常试验的神经特征,而不考虑刺激差异。这种“多变量失配”在两组中同样强烈,且具有相似的时间进程。在两组中,仅经过两次重复产生的标准刺激就与异常刺激不同,这表明阅读障碍患者对重复具有正常的敏感性。然而,只有在对照组中,标准刺激与异常刺激的差异才会随着重复次数的增加而增大。这些结果表明,在阅读障碍中,许多引发神经适应以及失配反应的机制是完整的,可能除了一种将近期感觉信息依次整合到前馈处理中的假定预测机制之外。