Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Graduate Program in Molecular and Systems Pharmacology, Laney Graduate School, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Front Immunol. 2022 May 11;13:880829. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.880829. eCollection 2022.
Humoral immunity to factor VIII (FVIII) represents a significant challenge for the treatment of patients with hemophilia A. Current paradigms indicate that neutralizing antibodies against FVIII (inhibitors) occur through a classical CD4 T cell, germinal center (GC) dependent process. However, clinical observations suggest that the nature of the immune response to FVIII may differ between patients. While some patients produce persistent low or high inhibitor titers, others generate a transient response. Moreover, FVIII reactive memory B cells are only detectable in some patients with sustained inhibitor titers. The determinants regulating the type of immune response a patient develops, let alone how the immune response differs in these patients remains incompletely understood. One hypothesis is that polymorphisms within immunoregulatory genes alter the underlying immune response to FVIII, and thereby the inhibitor response. Consistent with this, studies report that inhibitor titers to FVIII differ in animals with the same pathogenic variant but completely distinct backgrounds; though, how these genetic disparities affect the immune response to FVIII remains to be investigated. Given this, we sought to mechanistically dissect how genetics impact the underlying immune response to FVIII. In particular, as the risk of producing inhibitors is weakly associated with differences in HLA, we hypothesized that genetic factors other than HLA influence the immune response to FVIII and downstream inhibitor formation. Our data demonstrate that FVIII deficient mice encoding the same MHC and variant produce disparate inhibitor titers, and that the type of inhibitor response formed associates with the ability to generate GCs. Interestingly, the formation of antibodies through a GC or non-GC pathway does not appear to be due to differences in CD4 T cell immunity, as the CD4 T cell response to an immunodominant epitope in FVIII was similar in these mice. These results indicate that genetics can impact the process by which inhibitors develop and may in part explain the apparent propensity of patients to form distinct inhibitor responses. Moreover, these data highlight an underappreciated immunological pathway of humoral immunity to FVIII and lay the groundwork for identification of biomarkers for the development of approaches to tolerize against FVIII.
针对血友病 A 患者的治疗,VIII 因子(FVIII)的体液免疫是一个重大挑战。目前的模式表明,针对 FVIII 的中和抗体(抑制剂)是通过经典的 CD4 T 细胞、生发中心(GC)依赖性过程产生的。然而,临床观察表明,患者对 FVIII 的免疫反应性质可能有所不同。虽然一些患者产生持续的低或高抑制剂滴度,而另一些患者产生短暂的反应。此外,只有在一些具有持续抑制剂滴度的患者中才能检测到 FVIII 反应性记忆 B 细胞。调节患者产生免疫反应类型的决定因素,更不用说这些患者的免疫反应有何不同,仍不完全清楚。一种假设是,免疫调节基因中的多态性改变了患者对 FVIII 的潜在免疫反应,从而改变了抑制剂的反应。与此一致的是,研究报告称,具有相同致病性变异但背景完全不同的动物中,FVIII 的抑制剂滴度不同;然而,这些遗传差异如何影响对 FVIII 的免疫反应仍有待研究。考虑到这一点,我们试图从机制上剖析遗传因素如何影响对 FVIII 的潜在免疫反应。特别是,由于产生抑制剂的风险与 HLA 的差异弱相关,我们假设除 HLA 以外的遗传因素会影响对 FVIII 的免疫反应和下游抑制剂的形成。我们的数据表明,编码相同 MHC 和变异的 FVIII 缺陷小鼠产生不同的抑制剂滴度,并且形成的抑制剂反应类型与生成 GC 的能力相关。有趣的是,通过 GC 或非 GC 途径形成抗体似乎不是由于 CD4 T 细胞免疫的差异,因为这些小鼠对 FVIII 中一个免疫显性表位的 CD4 T 细胞反应相似。这些结果表明,遗传因素可以影响抑制剂发展的过程,并在一定程度上解释了患者形成不同抑制剂反应的明显倾向。此外,这些数据突出了针对 FVIII 的体液免疫的一个被低估的免疫学途径,并为开发针对 FVIII 的耐受方法的生物标志物的鉴定奠定了基础。