• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农药风险评估过程中不同评估领域的研究:聚焦于基于微生物的农药

Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process: Focus on pesticides based on microorganisms.

作者信息

Mombert Pauline, Guijarro Díaz-Otero Belén, Alonso-Prados José Luis

机构信息

Unidad de Productos Fitosanitarios Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC) - Plant Protection Product Unit National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology Spain.

出版信息

EFSA J. 2022 May 25;20(Suppl 1):e200412. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.e200412. eCollection 2022 May.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2022.e200412
PMID:35634552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9131613/
Abstract

Both chemical and microbial active substances can currently be approved as pesticides in the EU, the provisions of their approval being set under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009. Although sharing the same legal framework, chemicals and microorganisms used as pesticides have different risk profiles especially because once released into the environment, microbial active substances may produce secondary metabolites, multiply, spread and possibly genetically adapt or transfer antimicrobial resistance genes to other microorganisms. Consequently, the risk assessment process must adjust to the specificities ensuing from the chemical or microbial nature of the active substance. This specific programme focused on the risk assessment of microorganisms used as pesticides, especially on the low-risk criteria linked to antimicrobial resistance and the risk assessment of secondary metabolites. The use of microorganisms in integrated pest management (IPM) programmes was also investigated. In 2020, the recently adopted Farm to Fork Strategy and the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, two important action plans of the European Green Deal, called for a 50% reduction in the use of and risk from chemical and more hazardous pesticides. Many microorganisms are likely to be approved as low-risk active substances, thus representing important tools to achieve this goal. Given the central role that microbial active substances could play towards a more sustainable food system, a need for information regarding the actual production of secondary metabolites by the microorganisms of interest and projects investigating IPM programmes at national and EU levels was identified.

摘要

目前,化学活性物质和微生物活性物质在欧盟都可被批准用作农药,其批准规定依据(欧盟)第1107/2009号法规制定。尽管用作农药的化学物质和微生物共享相同的法律框架,但它们具有不同的风险特征,特别是因为一旦释放到环境中,微生物活性物质可能会产生次生代谢产物、繁殖、传播,并可能在基因上适应或向其他微生物转移抗微生物抗性基因。因此,风险评估过程必须适应活性物质的化学或微生物性质所带来的特殊性。该专项计划聚焦于用作农药的微生物的风险评估,尤其关注与抗微生物抗性相关的低风险标准以及次生代谢产物的风险评估。还对微生物在综合虫害管理(IPM)计划中的使用情况进行了调查。2020年,最近通过的《从农场到餐桌战略》和《2030年生物多样性战略》这两项欧洲绿色协议的重要行动计划,呼吁将化学农药和更具危害性的农药的使用量及风险降低50%。许多微生物很可能被批准为低风险活性物质,从而成为实现这一目标的重要工具。鉴于微生物活性物质在建立更可持续的食品系统方面可能发挥的核心作用,人们确定需要有关目标微生物实际产生次生代谢产物的信息,以及在国家和欧盟层面调查综合虫害管理计划的项目信息。

相似文献

1
Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process: Focus on pesticides based on microorganisms.农药风险评估过程中不同评估领域的研究:聚焦于基于微生物的农药
EFSA J. 2022 May 25;20(Suppl 1):e200412. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.e200412. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Environmental and human health at risk - Scenarios to achieve the Farm to Fork 50% pesticide reduction goals.环境和人类健康面临风险 - 实现从农场到餐桌减少 50%农药目标的情景方案。
Environ Int. 2022 Jul;165:107296. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107296. Epub 2022 May 11.
3
European Union policy on pesticides: implications for agriculture in Ireland.欧盟农药政策:对爱尔兰农业的影响。
Pest Manag Sci. 2014 Nov;70(11):1646-54. doi: 10.1002/ps.3801. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
4
Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process.农药风险评估过程中不同评估领域的研究
EFSA J. 2020 Nov 26;18(Suppl 1):e181113. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.e181113. eCollection 2020 Nov.
5
EU microbial pest control: A revolution in waiting.欧盟微生物害虫防治:一场蓄势待发的革命。
Pest Manag Sci. 2022 Apr;78(4):1314-1325. doi: 10.1002/ps.6721. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
6
Towards 'one substance - one assessment': An analysis of EU chemical registration and aquatic risk assessment frameworks.迈向“一种物质-一种评估”:对欧盟化学物质注册和水生风险评估框架的分析。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111692. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111692. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
7
Integrated fly management in European ruminant operations from the perspective of directive 2009/128/EC on sustainable use of pesticides.从关于农药可持续使用的2009/128/EC号指令角度看欧洲反刍动物养殖中的综合苍蝇管理
Parasitol Res. 2015 Feb;114(2):379-89. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-4273-2. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
8
Development, registration and commercialization of microbial pesticides for plant protection.用于植物保护的微生物农药的研发、注册及商业化。
Int Microbiol. 2003 Dec;6(4):245-52. doi: 10.1007/s10123-003-0144-x. Epub 2003 Sep 3.
9
A process to provide harmonised criteria for the selection of indicators for pesticide risk reduction within the framework of the sustainable use directive.提供在可持续使用指令框架内用于减少农药风险的指标选择的协调标准的过程。
Pest Manag Sci. 2013 Apr;69(4):451-6. doi: 10.1002/ps.3430. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
10
Integrated modeling of agricultural scenarios (IMAS) to support pesticide action plans: the case of the Coulonge drinking water catchment area (SW France).支持农药行动计划的农业情景综合建模(IMAS):以库隆格饮用水集水区(法国西南部)为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Mar;24(8):6923-6950. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7657-2. Epub 2016 Oct 10.