Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari.
Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, G. Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2022 Sep 1;45(3):223-229. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000532. Epub 2022 May 30.
The aim of this study was to translate, culturally adapt and validate an Italian version of the Athlete Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ-I). We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of the psychometric properties of the AFAQ-I in university athletes with musculoskeletal injuries, culturally adapting it in accordance with international standards. Psychometric evaluation included the assessment of structural validity (exploratory factor analysis), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha and inter-item correlation), test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient, (ICC) (2,1)], measurement error and minimum detectable change (MDC). To examine construct validity, we compared (Spearman ρ) the AFAQ-I with a numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) subscales [FABQ-Physical Activity (FABQ-PA) and FABQ-Work (FABQ-W)]. The AFAQ-I was administered to 133 university athletes with musculoskeletal injuries (95 males and 38 females; mean age 25 years, SD 5; mean average pain duration 5.6 months, SD 8.7). Factor analysis revealed an acceptable 1-factor 10-item solution (explained common variance at minimum rank factor analysis: 0.74) although a couple of items (#6 and 9) presented low factor loadings, suggesting the presence of a small secondary dimension. Cronbach's alpha was 0.78 and the average inter-item correlation was 0.27. ICC (2,1) was 0.95 and the MDC was 4.4 points. As hypothesized a priori, the AFAQ-I moderately correlated with NPRS (ρ = 0.42), PCS (ρ = 0.59), FABQ-PA (ρ = 0.40) and FABQ-W (ρ = 0.34). In conclusion, the AFAQ-I is a valid Italian translation of AFAQ that demonstrates acceptable psychometric properties. However, we recommend further analysis of the construct definition of the AFAQ and additional examination of its structural validity.
本研究旨在翻译、文化调适并验证意大利版的运动员恐惧回避问卷(AFAQ-I)。我们对有肌肉骨骼损伤的大学生运动员进行了 AFAQ-I 的心理测量学特性的横断面评估,并根据国际标准对其进行了文化调适。心理测量评估包括结构有效性(探索性因素分析)、内部一致性(克朗巴赫的α和项目间相关性)、测试-重测可靠性[组内相关系数(ICC)(2,1)]、测量误差和最小可检测变化(MDC)。为了检验结构有效性,我们比较了(Spearman ρ) AFAQ-I 与数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)、疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)和恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ)分量表[FABQ-体力活动(FABQ-PA)和 FABQ-工作(FABQ-W)]。我们对 133 名有肌肉骨骼损伤的大学生运动员(95 名男性和 38 名女性;平均年龄 25 岁,标准差 5;平均平均疼痛持续时间 5.6 个月,标准差 8.7)进行了 AFAQ-I 测试。因素分析显示,可接受的 1 因素 10 项解决方案(在最低等级因素分析中解释共同方差:0.74),尽管有几个项目(#6 和 9)的因子负荷较低,表明存在一个较小的次要维度。克朗巴赫的α为 0.78,平均项目间相关性为 0.27。ICC(2,1)为 0.95,MDC 为 4.4 分。如先验假设的那样,AFAQ-I 与 NPRS(ρ=0.42)、PCS(ρ=0.59)、FABQ-PA(ρ=0.40)和 FABQ-W(ρ=0.34)中度相关。总之,AFAQ-I 是 AFAQ 的有效意大利语翻译,具有可接受的心理测量特性。然而,我们建议进一步分析 AFAQ 的结构定义,并进一步检验其结构有效性。