• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

100 例连续患者经颈动脉血运重建术的 30 天围手术期和一年临床结局的单中心经验。

A single-center experience of 30-day perioperative and one year clinical outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization in 100 consecutive patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center Health System Inc, Charleston, WV, USA.

出版信息

Vascular. 2023 Dec;31(6):1161-1172. doi: 10.1177/17085381221106330. Epub 2022 May 29.

DOI:10.1177/17085381221106330
PMID:35634873
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) using the ENROUTE system (Silk Road) has been proposed as a safe and effective alternative to both carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS). Two large registries (ROADSTER 1 and ROADSTER 2) have shown that TCAR has acceptable/low rates of perioperative stroke/death. This study will analyze the 30-day perioperative and 1-year clinical outcomes from a single-center.

PATIENT POPULATION AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from SVS/VQI TCAR surveillance project (TSP) of 100 consecutive patients (102 TCAR procedures) done in our institution. These procedures were done for high-risk patients for CEA, which included anatomical (previous CEA, high cervical lesion, neck radiation, stoma, arch type, etc.), physiological (CHF, severe coronary artery disease, COPD on O therapy, etc.) and combined anatomical/physiological reasons. These procedures were done by vascular surgeons after receiving the appropriate training. The perioperative stroke, death, and MI rates were analyzed. Kaplan Meyer analysis was used to estimate rate of freedom from stroke/death and the incidence of ≥50% and ≥80% in-stent restenosis at 1 year.

RESULTS

100 consecutive high-risk patients for CEA included: 38% anatomical, 44% physiological, and 18% combined anatomical and physiological reasons. The mean age was 72.5 years (range 52-90 years). Indications for TCAR were 34% for symptomatic lesions (TIA/stroke) and 66% for asymptomatic lesions. Mean ipsilateral treated stenosis was 80.4%. Contralateral ≥50% stenosis/occlusion was present in 31% of patients. Technical success rate was 100%. 92% had pre-stenting PTA and 26% had post-stenting PTA. The mean flow reversal time was 8.5 min (range 3-26 min). The 30-day perioperative stroke rate was 2.9% (1/67, 1.5% for asymptomatic patients), the stroke/death rate was 2.9%, and stroke/death and MI rate was 3.9% (4/102). Other perioperative complications included cranial nerve injury 3/102 (2.9%), carotid artery dissection (2%), and major hematoma (necessitated operation evacuation) (5.9%). Freedom from stroke rates and stroke/death rates at 1 year were: 90% and 89%. Freedom from ≥50% and ≥80% in-stent restenosis rates at 1 year were 82% and 90%, respectively. None of these restenosis were symptomatic except two (2/13). Freedom from reintervention rate at 1 year was 98%.

CONCLUSION

Although the perioperative events were somewhat higher than what has been reported in previous registries, TCAR for patients who are high-risk for CEA has a low perioperative stroke and stroke/death rates with satisfactory outcome at 1 year. Further long-term data is probably needed to verify long-term outcome.

摘要

背景

经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)使用 ENROUTE 系统(丝绸之路)已被提议作为颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术(TF-CAS)的安全有效的替代方法。两项大型注册研究(ROADSTER 1 和 ROADSTER 2)表明,TCAR 具有可接受/较低的围手术期卒中/死亡率。本研究将分析来自单中心的 30 天围手术期和 1 年临床结果。

患者人群和方法

这是对我们机构进行的 SVS/VQI TCAR 监测项目(TSP)的前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析,共 100 例连续患者(102 例 TCAR 手术)。这些手术是为 CEA 高危患者进行的,包括解剖学(既往 CEA、高位颈椎病变、颈部放射治疗、造口术、弓型等)、生理学(充血性心力衰竭、严重冠状动脉疾病、需要 O 治疗的慢性阻塞性肺病等)和联合解剖/生理原因。这些手术由接受过适当培训的血管外科医生进行。分析围手术期卒中、死亡和心肌梗死的发生率。Kaplan-Meier 分析用于估计 1 年内无卒中/死亡和支架内再狭窄发生率≥50%和≥80%的比例。

结果

100 例 CEA 高危患者包括:38%的解剖学原因,44%的生理学原因,18%的联合解剖和生理学原因。平均年龄为 72.5 岁(52-90 岁)。TCAR 的适应证为 34%的症状性病变(TIA/卒中)和 66%的无症状性病变。同侧治疗狭窄程度平均为 80.4%。31%的患者对侧存在≥50%狭窄/闭塞。技术成功率为 100%。92%的患者术前进行了支架内预扩张,26%的患者术后进行了支架内预扩张。平均血流逆转时间为 8.5 分钟(3-26 分钟)。30 天围手术期卒中发生率为 2.9%(1/67,无症状患者为 1.5%),卒中/死亡率为 2.9%,卒中/死亡和心肌梗死发生率为 3.9%(4/102)。其他围手术期并发症包括颅神经损伤 3/102(2.9%)、颈动脉夹层(2%)和大血肿(需要手术清除)(5.9%)。1 年时无卒中率和卒中/死亡率分别为 90%和 89%。1 年时支架内再狭窄发生率≥50%和≥80%的比例分别为 82%和 90%。除 2 例(2/13)外,其余再狭窄均无症状。1 年时再干预率为 98%。

结论

尽管围手术期事件略高于之前注册研究报道,但对于 CEA 高危患者,TCAR 具有较低的围手术期卒中率和卒中/死亡率,1 年时的结果令人满意。可能需要进一步的长期数据来验证长期结果。

相似文献

1
A single-center experience of 30-day perioperative and one year clinical outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization in 100 consecutive patients.100 例连续患者经颈动脉血运重建术的 30 天围手术期和一年临床结局的单中心经验。
Vascular. 2023 Dec;31(6):1161-1172. doi: 10.1177/17085381221106330. Epub 2022 May 29.
2
Clinical outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization vs carotid endarterectomy from a large single-center experience.来自大型单中心经验的经颈动脉血管重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的临床结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;79(6):1402-1411.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.01.213. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
3
Outcomes of transfemoral carotid artery stenting and transcarotid artery revascularization for restenosis after prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术治疗同侧颈动脉再狭窄后的转颈动脉血运重建术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):561-571.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.245. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
4
Physiologic risk factors increase risk of myocardial infarction with transcarotid artery revascularization in prospective trials.生理风险因素会增加经颈动脉血运重建术治疗的前瞻性试验中心肌梗死的风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Apr;77(4):1192-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.013. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
5
Thirty-Day Perioperative Clinical Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization vs Carotid Endarterectomy in a Single-Center Experience.单中心经验:经颈动脉血管重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的30天围手术期临床结果
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Apr 1;236(4):668-674. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000543. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
6
Transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量倡议中的经颈动脉动脉血运重建与经股颈动脉血管成形术。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):92-103.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
7
Propensity score-matched analysis of 1-year outcomes of transcarotid revascularization with dynamic flow reversal, carotid endarterectomy, and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.经颈动脉血管重建术(动态血流逆转)、颈动脉内膜切除术和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术1年结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):213-222.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.242. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
8
Perioperative outcomes of carotid endarterectomy and transfemoral and transcervical carotid artery stenting in radiation-induced carotid lesions.放射性颈动脉病变行颈动脉内膜切除术、经股动脉和经颈动脉腔内治疗的围手术期结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):915-920. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.087. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
9
Association of carotid revascularization approach with perioperative outcomes based on symptom status and degree of stenosis among octogenarians.基于症状和狭窄程度,80 岁及以上人群颈动脉血运重建方法与围手术期结局的相关性。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):769-777.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.027. Epub 2022 May 25.
10
Seven years of the transcarotid artery revascularization surveillance project, comparison to transfemoral stenting and endarterectomy.经颈动脉血运重建监测项目七年,与经股动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1455-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis: A single-center 14-year retrospective analysis.颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术的长期预后:一项单中心14年回顾性分析。
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2023 Jun;25(2):160-174. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2023.E2022.07.007. Epub 2023 Jan 31.