• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术的长期预后:一项单中心14年回顾性分析。

Long-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis: A single-center 14-year retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Kang Beom Mo, Yoon Seok Mann, Oh Jae Sang, Oh Hyuk Jin, Ahn Jae Min, Yun Gi Yong

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea.

出版信息

J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2023 Jun;25(2):160-174. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2023.E2022.07.007. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

DOI:10.7461/jcen.2023.E2022.07.007
PMID:36718046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10318231/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is currently widely used for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. The objective of this study was to analyze the outcomes of CAS performed in a single institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 313 CAS cases from January 2007 to December 2020, including 206 (66%) symptomatic and 107 (34%) asymptomatic cases. Procedure-related morbidity and mortality were assessed. Rates of periprocedural (≤30 days after CAS) and postprocedural ipsilateral strokes (>30 days after CAS) were also assessed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for the periprocedural complication, in-stent restenosis (ISR), and ipsilateral stroke.

RESULTS

The success rate of CAS was 98%. Among 313 cases, 1 patient died due to hyperperfusion-related intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The CAS-related mortality rate was 0.31%. The overall incidence of periprocedural complications is 5.1%. A risk factor for periprocedural complication was a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (7.3% vs. 0.9%, p=0.016). Twenty cases of ISR occurred during 63.7±42.1 months of follow-up. The overall incidence of ISR was 10.2% (20/196). A risk factors for ISR were diabetes mellitus (17.6% vs. 5.7%, p=0.008) and patients who used Open-cell stents (19.6% vs. 6.9%, p=0.010). The overall incidence of ipsilateral stroke is 5.6%. A risk factors for ipsilateral stroke was ISR (95% CI, p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

CAS is a safe and effective procedure for carotid artery stenosis. Although the incidence of complications is low, fatal complication such as hyperperfusion- related ICH can occur. To prevent hyperperfusion-related ICH, several methods such as strict blood pressure (BP) control, intentional less widening of stenotic segment should be used. To prevent ISR or stroke occurrence, special attention should be paid to patients who have ISR or ipsilateral stroke risk factors.

摘要

目的

颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)目前广泛应用于治疗颈动脉狭窄。本研究的目的是分析在单一机构进行的CAS的治疗结果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2007年1月至2020年12月期间的313例CAS病例,其中包括206例(66%)有症状病例和107例(34%)无症状病例。评估了与手术相关的发病率和死亡率。还评估了围手术期(CAS后≤30天)和术后同侧卒中(CAS后>30天)的发生率。采用逻辑回归分析确定围手术期并发症、支架内再狭窄(ISR)和同侧卒中的危险因素。

结果

CAS的成功率为98%。在313例病例中,1例患者因与高灌注相关的脑出血(ICH)死亡。CAS相关死亡率为0.31%。围手术期并发症的总发生率为5.1%。围手术期并发症的一个危险因素是有症状的颈动脉狭窄(7.3%对0.9%,p=0.016)。在63.7±42.1个月的随访期间发生了20例ISR。ISR的总发生率为10.2%(20/196)。ISR的危险因素是糖尿病(17.6%对5.7%,p=0.008)和使用开放式支架的患者(19.6%对6.9%,p=0.010)。同侧卒中的总发生率为5.6%。同侧卒中的一个危险因素是ISR(95%CI,p=0.002)。

结论

CAS是治疗颈动脉狭窄的一种安全有效的手术。虽然并发症的发生率较低,但可能会发生如与高灌注相关的ICH等致命并发症。为预防与高灌注相关的ICH,应采用严格控制血压(BP)、有意减少狭窄段扩张等多种方法。为预防ISR或卒中的发生,应特别关注有ISR或同侧卒中危险因素的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc7/10318231/09d99db15742/jcen-2023-e2022-07-007f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc7/10318231/35f73ce3ab03/jcen-2023-e2022-07-007f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc7/10318231/2afa6159aafa/jcen-2023-e2022-07-007f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc7/10318231/09d99db15742/jcen-2023-e2022-07-007f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc7/10318231/35f73ce3ab03/jcen-2023-e2022-07-007f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc7/10318231/2afa6159aafa/jcen-2023-e2022-07-007f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc7/10318231/09d99db15742/jcen-2023-e2022-07-007f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis: A single-center 14-year retrospective analysis.颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术的长期预后:一项单中心14年回顾性分析。
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2023 Jun;25(2):160-174. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2023.E2022.07.007. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
2
Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.高危患者颈动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040.
3
Remote pre-procedural ischemic stroke as the greatest risk in carotid‑stenting‑associated stroke and death: a single center's experience.远程术前缺血性卒中是颈动脉支架置入相关卒中和死亡的最大风险:单中心经验
Int Angiol. 2017 Aug;36(4):306-315. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.16.03737-8. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
4
Long-term outcomes of stenting and endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned pooled analysis of individual patient data.症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入术和内膜切除术的长期结果:一项个体化患者数据的预先计划的合并分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Apr;18(4):348-356. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30028-6. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
5
Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Severe In-Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting: Long-Term Outcomes and Review of Literature.切割球囊血管成形术治疗颈动脉支架置入术后严重支架内再狭窄:长期疗效及文献综述
Neurointervention. 2024 Mar;19(1):24-30. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2024.00010. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
6
Long-term Comparative Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting Following Previous Carotid Endarterectomy vs De Novo Lesions.既往颈动脉内膜切除术与新发病变后颈动脉支架置入术的长期比较结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Jun;22(3):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1526602815581597. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
Carotid artery stenting with distal protection using the carotid wallstent and filterwire neuroprotection: single-center experience of 380 cases with midterm outcomes.使用颈动脉壁支架和滤器导丝神经保护装置进行远端保护的颈动脉支架置入术:380例患者的单中心经验及中期结果
Vascular. 2006 Sep-Oct;14(5):237-44. doi: 10.2310/6670.2006.00054.
8
Multicenter Experience of Surgical Explantation of Carotid Stents for Recurrent Stenosis.颈动脉支架再狭窄手术取出术的多中心经验
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016 Nov;50(8):547-553. doi: 10.1177/1538574416677668. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
9
Periprocedural cilostazol treatment and restenosis after carotid artery stenting: the Retrospective Study of In-Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting (ReSISteR-CAS).经皮腔内颈动脉血管成形术及支架置入术后的培哚普利奥治疗与再狭窄:颈动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的回顾性研究(ReSISteR-CAS)。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012 Apr;21(3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
10
Pretreatment with and ongoing use of omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters reduce the slow-flow phenomenon and prevent in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting.ω-3脂肪酸乙酯预处理及持续使用可减少颈动脉支架置入患者的慢血流现象并预防支架内再狭窄。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jul;66(1):122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.132. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Photon-counting detector CT angiography to evaluate carotid and subclavian artery stents and compared to ultrasound and angiography - an in-vivo study with spectral reconstructions.光子计数探测器CT血管造影术评估颈动脉和锁骨下动脉支架并与超声和血管造影术比较——一项采用光谱重建的体内研究
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Sep 8:15910199251374274. doi: 10.1177/15910199251374274.

本文引用的文献

1
A single-center experience of 30-day perioperative and one year clinical outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization in 100 consecutive patients.100 例连续患者经颈动脉血运重建术的 30 天围手术期和一年临床结局的单中心经验。
Vascular. 2023 Dec;31(6):1161-1172. doi: 10.1177/17085381221106330. Epub 2022 May 29.
2
Carotid artery stenting without embolic protection: A randomized multicenter trial (the CASWEP trial).颈动脉支架置入术无栓子保护:一项随机多中心试验(CASWEP 试验)。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Aug;29(4):419-425. doi: 10.1177/15910199221094388. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
3
Asymptomatic Cerebral Emboli Following Carotid Artery Stenting: A Diffusion-Weighted MRI Study.
颈动脉支架置入术后无症状性脑栓塞:一项弥散加权 MRI 研究。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2022 Apr;26(4):298-304. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.970.
4
Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Experience of a Hybrid Neurosurgeon in a Developing Nation.症状性颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术:发展中国家杂交神经外科医生的经验。
Neurol India. 2022 Jan-Feb;70(1):94-101. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.336326.
5
Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting for Occlusive Diseases.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术治疗闭塞性疾病。
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2022;44:209-223. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-87649-4_11.
6
The periprocedural and 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting in patients with carotid artery near-occlusion.颈动脉近闭塞患者颈动脉支架置入术的围手术期和 30 天结局。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 8;11(1):21876. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01286-3.
7
Case Report: A Cluster of Complications During Carotid Artery Stenting Managed With Peripheral, Coronary, and Imaging Techniques.病例报告:应用外周、冠状动脉及成像技术处理的颈动脉支架置入术中的一系列并发症
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 9;8:712963. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.712963. eCollection 2021.
8
Six-year outcomes of carotid artery stenting performed with multidisciplinary management in a single center.单中心多学科管理下颈动脉支架置入术的 6 年结果。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2021 Jun;25(6):385-394. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.20420.
9
The management of carotid restenosis: a comprehensive review.颈动脉再狭窄的管理:一项全面综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1272. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-963.
10
Risk Factors for the Development of Carotid Artery In-Stent Restenosis: Multivariable Analysis.颈动脉支架再狭窄的危险因素:多变量分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Mar;24:65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.09.005. Epub 2020 Sep 3.