Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali Rwanda; University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK), Kigali, Rwanda.
Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
J Surg Res. 2022 Oct;278:216-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.066. Epub 2022 May 25.
The management of severe burns and pediatric burns requires an organized system of care delivery, which includes referral guidelines. In Rwanda, the burn unit at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK) is the only dedicated burn unit in the country and admits patients of all ages referred from the other provinces. However, since there are no official referral guidelines, it is unknown whether patients with burns are appropriately referred. This study aims to analyze referral patterns among burn patients admitted at the CHUK burn unit and their adherence to the referral criteria listed by the American Burn Association (ABA), comparing patients transferred to the burn unit from facilities within Kigali and those referred from facilities outside Kigali.
This retrospective study included all patients with acute burns admitted to the CHUK burn unit with data available on the province of origin from 2005 to 2019. Patients with burns younger than 16 y were defined as pediatric burns, as per the CHUK routines. Characteristics of all burns referred from a facility within Kigali (Pat-K) and facilities outside Kigali (Pat-O) were compared using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. The adherence to ABA referral criteria was assessed for variables with available data, which were total burnt surface area %, burn thickness, cause of burn, and age.
The study population consisted of 1093 patients, of which 1064 had data regarding if they were referred from other facilities to CHUK. Overall, the median age was 3 y (2-16 y), with Pat-O being older than Pat-K (P < 0.001). Scalds were the dominant cause of injury in both groups; flame was more common among Pat-O than among Pat-K (in 25.5% versus 10.6%, P < 0.01). Burns of larger size and depth were more common among Pat-O, as compared to the Pat-K group [median total burnt surface area % = 19% versus 15.5%, respectively (P < 0.001); presence of full-thickness burns = 55.6% versus 29.7 %, respectively (P < 0.001)]. Hospitalization was longer and in-hospital mortality higher in Pat-O than in Pat-K [LOS = 42 d (interquartile range 11-164) versus 28 d (interquartile range 9-132), P < 0.05; in-hospital mortality = 18.9% versus 10.1%, P < 0.001]. Among Pat-O, 85% had characteristics that mirrored one or more of the analyzed ABA criteria.
Although there are no clear guidelines, referral patterns indicate that patients are being appropriately referred for specialized burn care in Rwanda. Compared to patients from Kigali, rural patients had larger and more severe injuries, needed more surgical interventions, and had worse outcomes. Most of referred patients matched criteria listed among international referral guidelines. However, the statement of national referral criteria is essential to improve timely access to adequate care.
严重烧伤和儿科烧伤的管理需要一个有组织的护理提供系统,其中包括转诊指南。在卢旺达,基加利大学教学医院(CHUK)的烧伤科是该国唯一的专门烧伤科,接收来自其他省份的所有年龄段的患者。然而,由于没有正式的转诊指南,尚不清楚是否有适当转诊烧伤患者。本研究旨在分析 CHUK 烧伤科收治的烧伤患者的转诊模式及其对美国烧伤协会(ABA)列出的转诊标准的遵守情况,比较从基加利的医疗机构转来的烧伤患者和从基加利以外的医疗机构转诊的烧伤患者。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2005 年至 2019 年间在 CHUK 烧伤科住院的所有急性烧伤患者,且资料中包含原籍省份信息。根据 CHUK 的常规,年龄小于 16 岁的烧伤患者被定义为儿科烧伤。比较了从基加利的医疗机构(Pat-K)和基加利以外的医疗机构(Pat-O)转诊的所有烧伤患者的特征,对于分类变量使用 Fisher 确切检验,对于连续变量使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验。评估了可用数据的 ABA 转诊标准的符合情况,这些变量包括总烧伤面积%、烧伤深度、烧伤原因和年龄。
研究人群包括 1093 例患者,其中 1064 例患者有关于他们是否从其他医疗机构转诊到 CHUK 的资料。总体而言,中位年龄为 3 岁(2-16 岁),Pat-O 组的年龄大于 Pat-K 组(P<0.001)。烫伤是两组中最常见的损伤原因;火焰烧伤在 Pat-O 中比 Pat-K 更常见(分别为 25.5%和 10.6%,P<0.01)。与 Pat-K 组相比,Pat-O 组的烧伤面积和深度更大[总烧伤面积%中位数分别为 19%和 15.5%(P<0.001);全层烧伤的存在率分别为 55.6%和 29.7%(P<0.001)]。Pat-O 组的住院时间更长,院内死亡率更高[住院时间中位数分别为 42 天(四分位距 11-164)和 28 天(四分位距 9-132),P<0.05;院内死亡率分别为 18.9%和 10.1%,P<0.001]。在 Pat-O 组中,85%的患者的特征符合分析的 ABA 标准之一或多项。
尽管没有明确的指南,但转诊模式表明,患者正在被恰当地转诊到卢旺达接受专门的烧伤护理。与基加利的患者相比,农村患者的损伤更大、更严重,需要更多的手术干预,且预后更差。大多数转诊患者符合国际转诊指南中列出的标准。然而,明确国家转诊标准对于改善及时获得适当护理的机会至关重要。