Suppr超能文献

麻醉人员在模拟非危急和危急情况下对患者监测的视觉注意力:一项眼动追踪研究。

Anesthesia personnel's visual attention regarding patient monitoring in simulated non-critical and critical situations, an eye-tracking study.

机构信息

Institute of Anesthesiology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

Athena Institute, Faculty of Science, VU University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1091, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 30;22(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01705-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive ergonomics design of patient monitoring may reduce human factor errors in high-stress environments. Eye-tracking is a suitable tool to gain insight into the distribution of visual attention of healthcare professionals with patient monitors, which may facilitate their further development.

METHODS

This prospective, exploratory, high-fidelity simulation study compared anesthesia personnel's visual attention (fixation count and dwell-time) to 15 areas of interest on the patient monitor during non-critical and critical anesthesia situations. Furthermore, we examined the extent to which participants' experience influenced visual attention and which vital signs displayed on the patient monitor received the most visual attention. We used mixed zero-inflated Poisson regression and mixed linear models to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Analyzing 23 ten-minute scenarios, we found significantly more fixations to the areas of interest on the patient monitor during critical than non-critical situations (rate ratio of 1.45; 95% CI 1.33 to 1.59; p < 0.001). However, the dwell-time on the areas of interest did not significantly differ between the non-critical and critical situations (coefficient of - 1.667; 95% CI - 4.549 to 1.229; p = 0.27). The professional experience did not significantly influence the visual attention (fixation: rate ratio of 0.88; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.43; p = 0.61 and dwell-time: coefficient of 0.889; 95% CI - 1.465 to 3.229; p = 0.27). Over all situations, anesthesia personnel paid the most attention to the vital signs blood pressure (fixation: mean [SD] of 108 [74.83]; dwell-time: mean [SD] of 27 [15.90] seconds), end-expiratory carbon dioxide (fixation: mean [SD] of 59 [47.39]; dwell-time: mean [SD] of 30 [21.51] seconds), and the electrocardiogram (fixation: mean [SD] of 58 [64.70]; dwell-time: mean [SD] of 15 [14.95] seconds).

CONCLUSIONS

Critical anesthesia situations increased anesthesia personnel's visual interaction with the patient monitor. Furthermore, we found that their visual attention focused mainly on a few vital signs. To assist clinicians in critical situations, manufacturers should optimize monitors to convey necessary information as easily and quickly as possible and optimize the visibility of less frequently observed but equally critical vital signs, especially when they are in an abnormal range.

摘要

背景

患者监测的认知工效学设计可以减少高压力环境中的人为因素错误。眼动追踪是一种合适的工具,可以深入了解医疗保健专业人员在使用患者监护仪时的视觉注意力分布,这可能有助于进一步开发患者监护仪。

方法

本前瞻性、探索性、高保真度模拟研究比较了麻醉人员在非关键和关键麻醉情况下,对患者监护仪上 15 个感兴趣区域的视觉注意力(注视次数和注视时间)。此外,我们还研究了参与者的经验在多大程度上影响了视觉注意力,以及患者监护仪上显示的哪些生命体征受到了最多的视觉关注。我们使用混合零膨胀泊松回归和混合线性模型来分析数据。

结果

分析了 23 个十分钟的场景,我们发现关键情况下患者监护仪上的注视次数明显多于非关键情况(比率为 1.45;95%CI 1.33 至 1.59;p<0.001)。然而,在非关键和关键情况下,对感兴趣区域的注视时间并没有显著差异(系数为-1.667;95%CI-4.549 至 1.229;p=0.27)。专业经验并没有显著影响视觉注意力(注视次数:比率为 0.88;95%CI 0.54 至 1.43;p=0.61;注视时间:系数为 0.889;95%CI-1.465 至 3.229;p=0.27)。在所有情况下,麻醉人员最关注的生命体征是血压(注视次数:平均[SD]为 108[74.83];注视时间:平均[SD]为 27[15.90]秒)、呼气末二氧化碳(注视次数:平均[SD]为 59[47.39];注视时间:平均[SD]为 30[21.51]秒)和心电图(注视次数:平均[SD]为 58[64.70];注视时间:平均[SD]为 15[14.95]秒)。

结论

关键麻醉情况增加了麻醉人员与患者监护仪的视觉交互。此外,我们发现他们的视觉注意力主要集中在几个生命体征上。为了帮助临床医生在危急情况下,制造商应该优化监护仪,以便尽可能轻松、快速地传达必要的信息,并优化不太经常观察到但同样重要的生命体征的可视性,特别是当这些生命体征处于异常范围时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adef/9150340/8ce605b10ca1/12871_2022_1705_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验