Parween Sadia, Prasad Dipali, Poonam Poonam, Ahmar Rizwan, Sinha Archana, Ranjana Ranjana
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Pediatric Medicine, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Apr 25;14(4):e24464. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24464. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Objective The aim of this study was to determine the perinatal outcome of pregnant patients complicated with meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) compared with clear amniotic fluid. Methodology This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in collaboration with the Department of Pediatrics at Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India, from September 2016 to January 2018. A total of 200 patients were included in the study after taking their written consent. Out of these 200 patients, 100 patients had MSAF, and the other 100 patients with clear liquor were taken as controls after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. These two groups of patients were compared regarding various maternal and neonatal parameters. These parameters were compared and tested statistically for significance. Results Among the 100 patients with MSAF, 20 patients had grade 1 meconium (X), 22 patients had grade 2 meconium (Y), and 58 patients had grade 3 meconium (Z). The majority of patients in the MSAF group were primigravida and more than 25 years of age. In addition, 47% of patients in the MSAF group had some associated high-risk factors and 50% of patients had non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns, and among these, 39 patients had grade 3 MSAF (X). In the MSAF group, 49% of patients had undergone lower segment cesarean section (LSCS), whereas in the non-MSAF group, it was 37%. Also, 30% of babies in the MSAF group and 13% in the non-MSAF group had neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission; 22% of babies in the MSAF group and 12% of babies in the non-MSAF group had an adverse neonatal outcome. Meconium aspiration syndrome was present in 14% of the patients in the MSAF group, and among these, two babies had neonatal death and both had severe birth asphyxia. In the non-MSAF group, there was one neonatal death due to neonatal sepsis. However, after statistically analyzing the neonatal outcome in both the groups, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (p<0.001). Conclusion MSAF is associated with increased frequency of operative delivery, poor neonatal outcomes, and increased NICU admission. Management of labor with MSAF requires appropriate intrapartum care with continuous fetal heart rate monitoring, and this can reduce unnecessary cesarean sections in patients with MSAF.
目的 本研究旨在确定与羊水清的孕妇相比,合并羊水粪染(MSAF)的孕妇的围产期结局。方法 本前瞻性横断面研究于2016年9月至2018年1月在印度巴特那英迪拉·甘地医学科学研究所妇产科与儿科合作开展。在获得200名患者的书面同意后将其纳入研究。在这200名患者中,100名患者有羊水粪染,另外100名羊水清的患者在满足纳入和排除标准后作为对照组。对这两组患者的各种母体和新生儿参数进行比较。对这些参数进行统计学比较和检验以确定其显著性。结果 在100名羊水粪染患者中,20名患者为1度粪染(X),22名患者为2度粪染(Y),58名患者为3度粪染(Z)。羊水粪染组的大多数患者为初产妇且年龄超过25岁。此外,羊水粪染组47%的患者有一些相关的高危因素,50%的患者有胎儿心率异常,其中39名患者为3度羊水粪染(X)。在羊水粪染组,49%的患者接受了低位剖宫产(LSCS),而在非羊水粪染组,这一比例为37%。此外,羊水粪染组30%的婴儿和非羊水粪染组13%的婴儿入住了新生儿重症监护病房(NICU);羊水粪染组22%的婴儿和非羊水粪染组12%的婴儿有不良新生儿结局。羊水粪染组14%的患者出现胎粪吸入综合征,其中两名婴儿死亡,且均有严重出生窒息。在非羊水粪染组,有一名新生儿因新生儿败血症死亡。然而,在对两组的新生儿结局进行统计学分析后,两组之间无统计学差异(p<0.001)。结论 羊水粪染与手术分娩频率增加、新生儿结局不良及入住NICU人数增加有关。对羊水粪染的分娩管理需要在产时进行适当护理并持续监测胎儿心率,这可以减少羊水粪染患者不必要的剖宫产。