Karpe Nilesh S, Tagad Manjusha B, Holkar Rahul R, More Vibha S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr. Balasaheb Vikhe Patil Rural Medical College, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, Loni, IND.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IND.
Cureus. 2025 May 1;17(5):e83295. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83295. eCollection 2025 May.
Background Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) often leads to complicated deliveries ranging from instrumental delivery, cesarean delivery, and neonatal complications like fetal distress, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal death. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of MSAF in fetal distress, to determine the clinical profile of newborns in terms of risk factors, and to study the association between antenatal or intra-natal risk factors with MSAF, between umbilical cord pH and MSAF, between stage of labor and MSAF, and between fetal distress and MSAF. Methods A total of 200 cases were enrolled after the diagnosis of fetal distress in the intrapartum period in this observational, non-interventional, and cross-sectional study. The inclusion criteria involved pregnant women who had intrapartum fetal distress diagnosed by the abnormal fetal heart rate findings on cardiotocography (CTG) and the interpretation of CTG, adapted from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Clinical Guideline 190, was used to classify CTG as abnormal irrespective of underlying causes, mode of delivery by cesarean section, and who were willing to participate. The retrospective and prospective data were collected from the labor room records, and statistical analysis was conducted. Results The study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of MSAF in fetal distress, for which 52/200 (26%) women were reported with moderate MSAF as an obstetric risk factor. A total of 66/200 (33%) women showed a significant association of antenatal or intra-natal risk factors with MSAF. However, an association between umbilical cord pH and MSAF, and between stage of labor and MSAF, was found to be insignificant. Fetal distress was reported to be significantly associated with MSAF, with 41/200 (20.5%) women reporting variable deceleration and 20/200 (10%) reporting late deceleration. Conclusion Moderate MSAF is accounted for as an obstetric risk factor. The association of MSAF with antenatal or intra-natal risk factors was also reported to be significant for obstetric risk factors. But, an association between umbilical cord pH and MSAF, and between stage of labor and MSAF, was found to be insignificant. However, the association between MSAF and fetal distress was significant, indicating the increasing number of cesarean sections being performed for fetal distress. The study reports the association, whereas the future scope might inculcate the strength of the association using odds ratio or prevalence ratio.
背景 羊水胎粪污染(MSAF)常导致复杂分娩,包括器械助产、剖宫产,以及诸如胎儿窘迫、新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)收治和新生儿死亡等新生儿并发症。因此,本研究旨在评估胎儿窘迫中MSAF的患病率,确定新生儿在危险因素方面的临床特征,并研究产前或产时危险因素与MSAF之间、脐动脉血pH值与MSAF之间、产程阶段与MSAF之间,以及胎儿窘迫与MSAF之间的关联。方法 在这项观察性、非干预性横断面研究中,共纳入200例在产时诊断为胎儿窘迫的病例。纳入标准包括通过产时胎心监护(CTG)异常胎心率发现诊断为产时胎儿窘迫的孕妇,采用英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)临床指南190对CTG进行解读,无论潜在病因如何,将CTG分类为异常,剖宫产分娩方式,且愿意参与者。从产房记录中收集回顾性和前瞻性数据,并进行统计分析。结果 本研究旨在评估胎儿窘迫中MSAF的患病率,其中52/200(26%)的女性被报告有中度MSAF作为产科危险因素。共有66/200(33%)的女性显示产前或产时危险因素与MSAF之间存在显著关联。然而,发现脐动脉血pH值与MSAF之间以及产程阶段与MSAF之间的关联不显著。据报告,胎儿窘迫与MSAF显著相关,41/200(20.5%)的女性报告有变异减速,20/200(10%)的女性报告有晚期减速。结论 中度MSAF被视为产科危险因素。MSAF与产前或产时危险因素之间的关联也被报告对产科危险因素具有显著意义。但是,发现脐动脉血pH值与MSAF之间以及产程阶段与MSAF之间的关联不显著。然而,MSAF与胎儿窘迫之间的关联显著,这表明因胎儿窘迫而进行的剖宫产数量在增加。本研究报告了这种关联,而未来的研究范围可能会使用比值比或患病率比来阐述这种关联的强度。