Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Medtronic Integrated Health Solutions, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;9(4):2518-2527. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13958. Epub 2022 May 31.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires intensive, complex, and multidisciplinary care for heart failure (HF) patients. Due to limitations in time, resources, and coordination of care, in current practice, this is often incomplete. We evaluated the effect of the introduction of a CRT-care pathway (CRT-CPW) on clinical outcome and costs.
The CRT-CPW focused on structuring CRT patient selection, implantation, and follow-up management. To facilitate and guarantee quality, checklists were introduced. The CRT-CPW was implemented in the Maastricht University Medical Centre in 2014. Physician-led usual care was restructured to a nurse-led care pathway. A retrospective comparison of data from CRT patients receiving usual care (2012-2014, 222 patients) and patients receiving care according to CRT-CPW (2015-2018, 241 patients) was performed. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization. Hospital-related costs of cardiovascular care after CRT implantation were analysed to address cost-effectiveness of the CRT-CPW. Demographics were comparable in the usual care and CRT-CPW groups. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the occurrence of the primary endpoint showed a significant improvement in the CRT-CPW group (25.7% vs. 34.7%, hazard ratio 0.56; confidence interval 0.40-0.78; P < 0.005), at 36 months of follow-up. The total costs for cardiology-related hospitalizations were significantly reduced in the CRT-CPW group [€17 698 (14 192-21 195) vs. 19 933 (16 980-22 991), P < 0.001]. Bootstrap cost-effectiveness analyses showed that implementation of CRT-CPW would be an economically dominant strategy in 90.7% of bootstrap samples.
The introduction of a novel multidisciplinary, nurse-led care pathway for CRT patients resulted in significant reduction of the combination of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalizations, at reduced cardiovascular-related hospital costs.
心脏再同步治疗(CRT)需要对心力衰竭(HF)患者进行密集、复杂和多学科的治疗。由于时间、资源和治疗协调的限制,目前这种治疗往往并不完整。我们评估了引入 CRT 护理路径(CRT-CPW)对临床结果和成本的影响。
CRT-CPW 侧重于 CRT 患者选择、植入和随访管理的结构化。为了便于和保证质量,引入了检查表。CRT-CPW 于 2014 年在马斯特里赫特大学医学中心实施。医生主导的常规护理被重组为护士主导的护理路径。对接受常规护理(2012-2014 年,222 例患者)和根据 CRT-CPW 接受护理(2015-2018 年,241 例患者)的 CRT 患者的数据进行回顾性比较。主要结果是全因死亡率和 HF 住院的复合结果。分析 CRT 植入后心血管护理的医院相关成本,以解决 CRT-CPW 的成本效益。常规护理和 CRT-CPW 组的人口统计学特征相当。Kaplan-Meier 估计主要终点的发生表明 CRT-CPW 组有显著改善(25.7% vs. 34.7%,风险比 0.56;置信区间 0.40-0.78;P < 0.005),在 36 个月的随访中。CRT-CPW 组的心血管相关住院总费用显著降低[€17698(14192-21195)vs. 19933(16980-22991),P < 0.001]。引导成本效益分析表明,在 90.7%的引导样本中,实施 CRT-CPW 将是一种具有经济优势的策略。
为 CRT 患者引入一种新的多学科、护士主导的护理路径,可显著降低全因死亡率和 HF 住院的联合发生率,并降低心血管相关的住院费用。