Division of Cellular and Gene Therapies, Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
J Virol. 2022 Jun 22;96(12):e0032022. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00320-22. Epub 2022 May 31.
Vaccination against influenza virus infection can protect the vaccinee and also reduce transmission to contacts. Not all types of vaccines induce sterilizing immunity via neutralizing antibodies; some instead permit low-level, transient infection. There has been concern that infection-permissive influenza vaccines may allow continued spread in the community despite minimizing symptoms in the vaccinee. We have explored that issue for a universal influenza vaccine candidate that protects recipients by inducing T cell responses and nonneutralizing antibodies. Using a mouse model, we have shown previously that an adenoviral vectored vaccine expressing nucleoprotein (NP) and matrix 2 (M2) provides broad protection against diverse strains and subtypes of influenza A viruses and reduces transmission to contacts in an antigen-specific manner. Here, we use this mouse model to further explore the mechanism and features of that reduction in transmission. Passive immunization did not reduce transmission from infected donors to naive contact animals to whom passive serum had been transferred. Vaccination of antibody-deficient mIgTg-JD mice, which have intact T cell responses and antigen presentation, reduced transmission in an antigen-specific manner, despite the presence of some virus in the lungs and nasal wash, pointing to a role for cellular immunity. Vaccination at ages ranging from 8 to 60 weeks was able to achieve reduction in transmission. Finally, the immune-mediated reduction in transmission persisted for at least a year after a single-dose intranasal vaccination. Thus, this infection-permissive vaccine reduces virus transmission in a long-lasting manner that does not require antibodies. Universal influenza virus vaccines targeting antigens conserved among influenza A virus strains can protect from severe disease but do not necessarily prevent infection. Despite allowing low-level infection, intranasal immunization with adenovirus vectors expressing the conserved antigens influenza nucleoprotein (A/NP) and M2 reduces influenza virus transmission from vaccinated to unvaccinated contact mice. Here, we show that antibodies are not required for this transmission reduction, suggesting a role for T cells. We also show that transmission blocking could be achieved in recipients of different ages and remained effective for at least a year following a single-dose vaccination. Such vaccines could have major public health impacts by limiting viral transmission in the community.
接种流感病毒感染疫苗可以保护疫苗接种者,并减少传播给接触者。并非所有类型的疫苗都通过中和抗体诱导绝育免疫;有些疫苗则允许低水平、短暂的感染。人们一直担心,感染性流感疫苗可能会允许继续在社区传播,尽管在疫苗接种者中最小化症状。我们已经针对通过诱导 T 细胞反应和非中和抗体来保护接受者的通用流感疫苗候选物探讨了这个问题。我们之前使用小鼠模型表明,表达核蛋白(NP)和基质 2(M2)的腺病毒载体疫苗为广泛保护免受不同株和亚型的流感 A 病毒,并以抗原特异性方式减少传播给接触者。在这里,我们使用该小鼠模型进一步探讨该传播减少的机制和特征。被动免疫不能减少从感染供体向被动血清转移到的未感染接触动物的传播。尽管肺部和鼻腔冲洗中存在一些病毒,但针对抗体缺陷的 mIgTg-JD 小鼠进行疫苗接种,以抗原特异性方式减少了传播,这指向细胞免疫的作用。在 8 至 60 周龄的范围内进行疫苗接种能够实现传播减少。最后,单次鼻腔内接种后,免疫介导的传播减少持续了至少一年。因此,这种感染性疫苗以不需要抗体的持久方式减少病毒传播。针对流感 A 病毒株之间保守抗原的通用流感病毒疫苗可以预防严重疾病,但不一定能预防感染。尽管允许低水平感染,但用表达保守抗原流感核蛋白(A/NP)和 M2 的腺病毒载体进行鼻腔免疫可减少从接种疫苗的接触小鼠到未接种疫苗的接触小鼠的流感病毒传播。在这里,我们表明,这种传播减少不需要抗体,表明 T 细胞的作用。我们还表明,在不同年龄的接受者中可以实现传播阻断,并且在单次接种疫苗后至少一年仍然有效。这种疫苗可以通过限制社区中的病毒传播对公共卫生产生重大影响。