Suppr超能文献

应用预测模型比较院外 eCPR 策略。

The Use of Predictive Modeling to Compare Prehospital eCPR Strategies.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.

BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(2):184-191. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2079782. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

Abstract

The duration of low flow prior to initiation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) appears to influence survival. Strategies to reduce the low-flow interval for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have been focused on expediting patient transport to the hospital or initiating extracorporeal support in the prehospital setting. To date, a direct comparison of low-flow interval between these strategies has not been made. To attempt this comparison, a model was created to predict low-flow intervals for each strategy at different locations across the city of Albuquerque, New Mexico. The data, specific to Albuquerque, suggest that a prehospital cannulation strategy consistently outperforms an expedited transport strategy, with an estimated difference in low-flow interval of 34.3 to 37.2 minutes, depending on location. There is no location within the city in which an expedited transport strategy results in a shorter low-flow interval than prehospital cannulation. It would be rare to successfully initiate eCPR by either strategy in fewer than 30 minutes from the time of patient collapse. Using a prehospital cannulation strategy, the entire coverage area could be eligible for eCPR within 60 minutes of patient collapse. The use of predictive modeling can be a low-cost solution to assist with strategic deployment of prehospital resources and may have potential for real-time decision support for prehospital clinicians.

摘要

体外心肺复苏(eCPR)前低血流持续时间似乎会影响生存率。减少院外心脏骤停低血流间隔的策略侧重于加快患者转运至医院或在院前环境中启动体外支持。迄今为止,尚未对这些策略之间的低血流间隔进行直接比较。为了尝试进行这种比较,我们创建了一个模型,以预测新墨西哥州阿尔伯克基市不同地点的每种策略的低血流间隔。针对阿尔伯克基市的数据表明,与加快转运策略相比,院前置管策略始终表现更好,低血流间隔估计差异为 34.3 至 37.2 分钟,具体取决于位置。在该市内,没有任何位置的加快转运策略会导致低血流间隔短于院前置管。很少有患者在发病后 30 分钟内成功启动 eCPR。通过这两种策略,从患者发病到成功启动 eCPR 的时间都很少少于 30 分钟。使用院前置管策略,在患者发病后 60 分钟内,整个覆盖区域都有资格接受 eCPR。使用预测模型可以是一种低成本的解决方案,以协助院前资源的战略部署,并有可能为院前临床医生提供实时决策支持。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验