• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特朗普政府扩大全球套套禁令政策对埃塞俄比亚计划生育服务提供的影响。

Impact of the Trump Administration's Expanded Global Gag Rule Policy on Family Planning Service Provision in Ethiopia.

机构信息

Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, 10038, USA.

School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Stud Fam Plann. 2022 Jun;53(2):339-359. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12196. Epub 2022 May 31.

DOI:10.1111/sifp.12196
PMID:35639923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9328269/
Abstract

The Global Gag Rule (GGR) makes non-U.S. nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) ineligible for U.S. Government global health funding if they provide, refer, or promote access to abortion. This study quantitatively examines the impacts of the GGR on family planning service provision in Ethiopia. Using a panel of health facilities (2017-2020), we conduct a pre-post analysis to investigate the overall changes in family planning service provision before and after the policy came into effect in Ethiopia. Our pre-post analyses revealed post-GGR reductions in the proportions of facilities reporting family planning provision through community health volunteers (-5.6, 95% CI [-10.2, -1.0]), mobile outreach visits (-13.1, 95% CI [-17.8, -8.4]), and family planning and postabortion care service integration (-4.8, 95% CI: [-9.1, -0.5]), as well as a 6.1 percentage points increase in contraceptive stock-outs over the past three months (95% CI [-0.6, 12.8]). We further investigate the impacts of the GGR on facilities exposed to noncompliant organizations that did not sign the policy and lost U.S. funding. We do not find any significant additional impacts on facilities in regions more exposed to noncompliant organizations. Overall, while the GGR was slow to fully impact NGOs in Ethiopia, it ultimately resulted in negative impacts on family planning service provision.

摘要

全球套套禁令(GGR)规定,如果非美国非政府组织(NGO)提供、转介或促进堕胎服务,将没有资格获得美国政府的全球卫生资金。本研究定量考察了 GGR 对埃塞俄比亚计划生育服务提供的影响。我们使用一组卫生机构(2017-2020 年)进行了预-后分析,以调查该政策在埃塞俄比亚生效前后计划生育服务提供的总体变化。我们的预-后分析显示,在 GGR 之后,报告通过社区卫生志愿者提供计划生育服务的机构比例有所下降(-5.6,95%CI[-10.2,-1.0])、流动外展访问减少(-13.1,95%CI[-17.8,-8.4])以及计划生育和流产后护理服务整合减少(-4.8,95%CI:[-9.1,-0.5]),同时过去三个月的避孕药具缺货率增加了 6.1 个百分点(95%CI[-0.6,12.8])。我们进一步调查了 GGR 对那些没有签署该政策且失去美国资金的非合规组织所暴露的机构的影响。我们没有发现更多暴露于非合规组织的地区的机构受到任何额外的显著影响。总体而言,尽管 GGR 对埃塞俄比亚的 NGO 产生影响的速度较慢,但最终还是对计划生育服务提供产生了负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e9/9328269/2f4cc8e31d29/SIFP-53-339-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e9/9328269/22b6ffe03075/SIFP-53-339-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e9/9328269/dda479041dcf/SIFP-53-339-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e9/9328269/fb855e81e3a1/SIFP-53-339-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e9/9328269/2f4cc8e31d29/SIFP-53-339-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e9/9328269/22b6ffe03075/SIFP-53-339-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e9/9328269/dda479041dcf/SIFP-53-339-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e9/9328269/fb855e81e3a1/SIFP-53-339-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e9/9328269/2f4cc8e31d29/SIFP-53-339-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of the Trump Administration's Expanded Global Gag Rule Policy on Family Planning Service Provision in Ethiopia.特朗普政府扩大全球套套禁令政策对埃塞俄比亚计划生育服务提供的影响。
Stud Fam Plann. 2022 Jun;53(2):339-359. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12196. Epub 2022 May 31.
2
The U.S. Global Gag Rule in Ethiopia: a foreign policy challenging domestic sexual and reproductive health and rights gains.美国在埃塞俄比亚的全球套套禁令:一项挑战国内性与生殖健康及权利的外交政策。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(Suppl 1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01329-6.
3
Investigating the early impact of the Trump Administration's Global Gag Rule on sexual and reproductive health service delivery in Uganda.调查特朗普政府全球套禁令对乌干达性健康和生殖健康服务提供的早期影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0231960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231960. eCollection 2020.
4
Impact of the global gag rule on women's contraceptive use and reproductive health outcomes in Ethiopia: a pre-post and difference-in-difference analysis.全球套套禁令对埃塞俄比亚妇女避孕措施使用和生殖健康结果的影响:一项前后和差分分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 5;13(5):e063099. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063099.
5
Postabortion and safe abortion care coverage, capacity, and caseloads during the global gag rule policy period in Ethiopia and Uganda.全球禁言令政策期间埃塞俄比亚和乌干达的堕胎后和安全堕胎护理覆盖范围、能力和病例数。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 1;23(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-09017-8.
6
Foreign ideology vs. national priority: impacts of the US Global Gag Rule on Nepal's sexual and reproductive healthcare system.外国意识形态与国家优先事项的对立:美国全球套套禁令对尼泊尔性与生殖健康护理系统的影响。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1831717. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1831717.
7
Slowing progress: the US Global Gag Rule undermines access to contraception in Madagascar.进展缓慢:美国全球套套禁令破坏了马达加斯加的避孕措施的可及性。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1838053. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1838053.
8
An investigation of the impact of the Global Gag Rule on women's sexual and reproductive health outcomes in Uganda: a difference-in-differences analysis.全球套套禁令对乌干达妇女生殖健康结局影响的调查:一项双重差分分析。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2122938. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2122938.
9
Foreign assistance or attack? Impact of the expanded Global Gag Rule on sexual and reproductive health and rights in Kenya.外援还是攻击?扩大后的全球套套禁令对肯尼亚性健康和生殖健康及权利的影响。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1794412. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1794412.
10
The impacts of the global gag rule on global health: a scoping review.全球禁言规则对全球健康的影响:一项范围综述。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2019 Aug 29;4:26. doi: 10.1186/s41256-019-0113-3. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the participation of community pharmacists in family planning services: A nonrandomized controlled trial.社区药剂师参与计划生育服务的评估:一项非随机对照试验。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Mar 11;14:100430. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100430. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
U.S. global health aid policy and family planning in sub-Saharan Africa.美国全球卫生援助政策与撒哈拉以南非洲的计划生育
Sci Adv. 2023 Dec 8;9(49):eadk2684. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adk2684. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
3
Impact of the global gag rule on women's contraceptive use and reproductive health outcomes in Ethiopia: a pre-post and difference-in-difference analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The U.S. Global Gag Rule in Ethiopia: a foreign policy challenging domestic sexual and reproductive health and rights gains.美国在埃塞俄比亚的全球套套禁令:一项挑战国内性与生殖健康及权利的外交政策。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(Suppl 1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01329-6.
2
Foreign ideology vs. national priority: impacts of the US Global Gag Rule on Nepal's sexual and reproductive healthcare system.外国意识形态与国家优先事项的对立:美国全球套套禁令对尼泊尔性与生殖健康护理系统的影响。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1831717. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1831717.
3
Slowing progress: the US Global Gag Rule undermines access to contraception in Madagascar.
全球套套禁令对埃塞俄比亚妇女避孕措施使用和生殖健康结果的影响:一项前后和差分分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 5;13(5):e063099. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063099.
4
Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic.德克萨斯州居民在冠状病毒大流行期间,行政命令暂停本州服务后,前往州外进行堕胎。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 19;20(4):3679. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043679.
5
Postabortion and safe abortion care coverage, capacity, and caseloads during the global gag rule policy period in Ethiopia and Uganda.全球禁言令政策期间埃塞俄比亚和乌干达的堕胎后和安全堕胎护理覆盖范围、能力和病例数。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 1;23(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-09017-8.
进展缓慢:美国全球套套禁令破坏了马达加斯加的避孕措施的可及性。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1838053. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1838053.
4
Restrictions On US Global Health Assistance Reduce Key Health Services In Supported Countries.美国全球卫生援助限制减少了受援国的关键卫生服务。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Sep;39(9):1557-1565. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00061.
5
From bad to worse: global governance of abortion and the Global Gag Rule.每况愈下:堕胎的全球治理与全球套禁令
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1794411. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1794411.
6
Foreign assistance or attack? Impact of the expanded Global Gag Rule on sexual and reproductive health and rights in Kenya.外援还是攻击?扩大后的全球套套禁令对肯尼亚性健康和生殖健康及权利的影响。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1794412. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1794412.
7
Investigating the early impact of the Trump Administration's Global Gag Rule on sexual and reproductive health service delivery in Uganda.调查特朗普政府全球套禁令对乌干达性健康和生殖健康服务提供的早期影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0231960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231960. eCollection 2020.
8
'Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance'? Towards a framework for assessing the health systems impact of the expanded Global Gag Rule.“在全球卫生援助中保护生命”?迈向评估扩大后的全球禁言规则对卫生系统影响的框架。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Sep 11;4(5):e001786. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001786. eCollection 2019.
9
USA aid policy and induced abortion in sub-Saharan Africa: an analysis of the Mexico City Policy.美国对撒哈拉以南非洲的援助政策与人工流产:对“墨西哥城政策”的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Aug;7(8):e1046-e1053. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30267-0. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
The implementation of safe abortion services in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚安全人工流产服务的实施。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;143 Suppl 4:19-24. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12673.