• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每况愈下:堕胎的全球治理与全球套禁令

From bad to worse: global governance of abortion and the Global Gag Rule.

机构信息

Chair, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Independent Research Consultant, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1794411. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1794411.

DOI:10.1080/26410397.2020.1794411
PMID:32835637
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7887909/
Abstract

The Trump Administration's (PLGHA) significantly expands the "Global Gag Rule" - and, in so doing, weakens the global governance of abortion. By chilling debate, reducing transparency, ghettoising sexual and reproductive health and rights work, and interfering with research, PLGHA makes an already bad context demonstrably worse. Individual women suffer the most, as PLGHA inhibits ongoing efforts to reduce abortion-related morbidity and mortality.

摘要

特朗普政府的(PLGHA)大大扩大了“全球套套法”——并因此削弱了堕胎的全球治理。通过扼杀辩论、降低透明度、将性和生殖健康及权利工作边缘化以及干预研究,PLGHA 使本来就糟糕的情况明显恶化。妇女个体受到的影响最大,因为 PLGHA 抑制了减少与堕胎相关的发病率和死亡率的持续努力。

相似文献

1
From bad to worse: global governance of abortion and the Global Gag Rule.每况愈下:堕胎的全球治理与全球套禁令
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1794411. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1794411.
2
Operational reality: the Global Gag Rule impacts sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings.实际情况:全球禁言规则影响人道主义环境中的性健康和生殖健康。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1824320. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1824320.
3
Adolescent and youth responses to the Global Gag Rule in Nepal.尼泊尔青少年和青年对全球禁言规则的反应。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1825046. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1825046.
4
Foreign ideology vs. national priority: impacts of the US Global Gag Rule on Nepal's sexual and reproductive healthcare system.外国意识形态与国家优先事项的对立:美国全球套套禁令对尼泊尔性与生殖健康护理系统的影响。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1831717. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1831717.
5
Perspectives of an SRHR advocate on the impact of the Global Gag Rule in Kenya.一位性健康和生殖健康权利倡导者对全球禁言规则在肯尼亚影响的看法。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1795449. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1795449.
6
Call in the lawyers: mitigating the Global Gag Rule.请来律师:减轻全球禁言规则的影响。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1815935. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1815935.
7
Foreign assistance or attack? Impact of the expanded Global Gag Rule on sexual and reproductive health and rights in Kenya.外援还是攻击?扩大后的全球套套禁令对肯尼亚性健康和生殖健康及权利的影响。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1794412. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1794412.
8
The U.S. Global Gag Rule in Ethiopia: a foreign policy challenging domestic sexual and reproductive health and rights gains.美国在埃塞俄比亚的全球套套禁令:一项挑战国内性与生殖健康及权利的外交政策。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(Suppl 1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01329-6.
9
The "Global gag rule": Curtailing women's reproductive rights.“全球禁言规则”:削减妇女的生殖权利。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2019 Jul-Sept;4(3):198-201. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2019.015. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
10
The Global Gag Rule: The death trap for comprehensive sexual and reproductive healthcare and way to overcome the US gag rule.全球禁言规则:全面性与生殖健康护理的死亡陷阱及克服美国禁言规则的方法。
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jun 11;27(2):e87-e99. doi: 10.15586/jptcp.v27i2.677.

引用本文的文献

1
The Zika virus: an opportunity to revisit reproductive health needs and disparities.寨卡病毒:重新审视生殖健康需求与差距的契机。
Germs. 2022 Dec 31;12(4):519-537. doi: 10.18683/germs.2022.1357. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
A narrative review of challenges related to healthcare worker rights, roles and responsibilities in the provision of sexual and reproductive services in health facilities.卫生保健机构提供性与生殖服务相关的医护人员权利、角色与职责的挑战:叙述性回顾
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Nov;8(Suppl 4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012421.
3
Impact of the Trump Administration's Expanded Global Gag Rule Policy on Family Planning Service Provision in Ethiopia.特朗普政府扩大全球套套禁令政策对埃塞俄比亚计划生育服务提供的影响。
Stud Fam Plann. 2022 Jun;53(2):339-359. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12196. Epub 2022 May 31.
4
A summative content analysis of how programmes to improve the right to sexual and reproductive health address power.对旨在改善性健康和生殖健康权利的方案如何处理权力问题的总结性内容分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Apr;7(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008438.
5
Unpacking power dynamics in research and evaluation on social accountability for sexual and reproductive health and rights.剖析性健康和生殖健康及权利社会问责制研究和评价中的权力动态
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Feb 6;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01398-2.
6
Exporting bad policy: an introduction to the special issue on the GGR's impact.输出不良政策:关于全球治理指标(GGR)影响的特刊介绍
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1831748. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1831748.
7
Slowing progress: the US Global Gag Rule undermines access to contraception in Madagascar.进展缓慢:美国全球套套禁令破坏了马达加斯加的避孕措施的可及性。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(3):1838053. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1838053.

本文引用的文献

1
Zika, abortion and health emergencies: a review of contemporary debates.寨卡、堕胎与卫生紧急事件:当代争议综述。
Global Health. 2019 Jul 24;15(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0489-3.
2
Novel approaches to estimating abortion incidence.估算堕胎发生率的新方法。
Reprod Health. 2019 Apr 18;16(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0702-0.
3
Abortion laws reform may reduce maternal mortality: an ecological study in 162 countries.堕胎法改革可能降低孕产妇死亡率:一项对162个国家的生态学研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Jan 5;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0705-y.
4
The magnitude and severity of abortion-related morbidity in settings with limited access to abortion services: a systematic review and meta-regression.在堕胎服务获取受限地区,与堕胎相关的发病情况的严重程度:一项系统评价与元回归分析
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Jun 29;3(3):e000692. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000692. eCollection 2018.
5
Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010-14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model.全球、区域和次区域不安全人工流产分类,2010-2014 年:贝叶斯层次模型估计。
Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2372-2381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31794-4. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
6
Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends.1990年至2014年期间的堕胎发生率:全球、区域和次区域层面及趋势。
Lancet. 2016 Jul 16;388(10041):258-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30380-4. Epub 2016 May 11.
7
Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis.全球孕产妇死亡原因:世卫组织系统分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. Epub 2014 May 5.
8
Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008.人工流产:1995 年至 2008 年全球发生率和趋势。
Lancet. 2012 Feb 18;379(9816):625-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61786-8. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
9
The right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress: in search of state obligations in relation to health.享受科学进步成果的权利:探寻国家在健康方面的义务。
Med Health Care Philos. 2011 Nov;14(4):371-81. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9327-y.
10
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》
Annu Rev Popul Law. 1989;16:124.