Arizona School of Health Sciences, A.T. Still University, 5850 E. Still Circle, Mesa, AZ 85206, USA. Tel 480-219-6061.
J Allied Health. 2022 Summer;51(2):e59-e63.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, academic leaders were pressed to respond to the growing health crisis. The rapid response and decision-making necessitated heightened vigilance, emotional intelligence, and attention to institutional turbulence. To understand the pattern of planning and action from academic leaders in response to the global health crisis, we conducted a study to explore the framing of decisions among academic deans during COVID-19. In this qualitative study, 10 participants were interviewed via Zoom using 10 questions designed to gather data related to both a leadership framing theory and management styles in the time of crisis. Qualitative data analysis identified common themes which aligned with Bolman and Deal's leadership frames of structural, human relations, symbolic, and political domains.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,学术领袖们被迫应对日益严重的健康危机。快速的反应和决策需要高度的警惕、情商和对机构动荡的关注。为了了解学术领袖在应对全球健康危机时的规划和行动模式,我们进行了一项研究,以探讨 COVID-19 期间学术院长们决策的框架。在这项定性研究中,我们通过 Zoom 采访了 10 名参与者,使用了 10 个问题,旨在收集与领导力框架理论和危机时期管理风格相关的数据。定性数据分析确定了与 Bolman 和 Deal 的结构、人际关系、象征性和政治领域的领导力框架一致的共同主题。