• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2011 年至 2016 年期间的机会性输卵管切除术:描述性分析。

Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis.

机构信息

Division of Gynaecologic Oncology (Hanley, Kwon, Huntsman, Finlayson, McAlpine, Miller), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Huntsman), University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health (Finlayson), Vancouver, BC; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Niu, Han, Fung, Bryant, Huntsman, Earle), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Bryant) and Department of Oncology (Bryant), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.

出版信息

CMAJ Open. 2022 May 31;10(2):E466-E475. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210219. Print 2022 Apr-Jun.

DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20210219
PMID:35640988
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9177200/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the removal of fallopian tubes during hysterectomy for benign indications or instead of tubal ligation, for the purpose of preventing ovarian cancer. We determined rates of OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization and examined how they changed over the study period.

METHODS

Using data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System for all Canadian provinces and territories (except Quebec) between the fiscal years 2011 and 2016, we conducted a descriptive analysis of all patients aged 15 years or older who underwent hysterectomy or tubal sterilization. We excluded those with diagnostic codes for any gynecologic cancer and those who underwent unilateral salpingectomy. We examined the proportion who had OS during their hysterectomy and compared the proportion of tubal sterilizations that were OS with the proportion that were tubal ligations.

RESULTS

A total of 318 528 participants were included in the study (mean age 42.5 yr). The proportion of hysterectomies that included OS increased from 15.4% in 2011 to 35.5% by 2016. With respect to tubal sterilization, the rate of OS increased from 6.5% of all tubal sterilizations in 2011 to 22.0% in 2016. There was considerable variation across jurisdictions in 2016, with British Columbia having the highest rates (53.2% of all hysterectomies and 74.0% of tubal sterilizations involved OS).

INTERPRETATION

The rates of OS increased between 2011 and 2016, but there was considerable variation across the included jurisdictions. Our study indicates room for rates of OS to increase across many of the included jurisdictions.

摘要

背景

机会性输卵管切除术(OS)是在因良性指征行子宫切除术时切除输卵管,或者替代输卵管结扎术,以预防卵巢癌。我们确定了子宫切除术和输卵管绝育术时行 OS 的比率,并研究了其在研究期间的变化情况。

方法

我们利用加拿大卫生信息研究所的出院摘要数据库和除魁北克省以外的所有加拿大省和地区的国家门诊护理报告系统的数据,对 2011 年至 2016 年期间所有 15 岁或以上接受子宫切除术或输卵管绝育术的患者进行了描述性分析。我们排除了患有任何妇科癌症诊断代码的患者和接受单侧输卵管切除术的患者。我们检查了在子宫切除术期间行 OS 的患者比例,并比较了行 OS 的输卵管绝育术与行输卵管结扎术的比例。

结果

本研究共纳入 318528 例患者(平均年龄 42.5 岁)。在子宫切除术期间行 OS 的比例从 2011 年的 15.4%增加到 2016 年的 35.5%。就输卵管绝育术而言,OS 的发生率从 2011 年所有输卵管绝育术的 6.5%增加到 2016 年的 22.0%。2016 年,各司法管辖区之间的差异很大,不列颠哥伦比亚省的比率最高(所有子宫切除术中有 53.2%涉及 OS,所有输卵管绝育术中有 74.0%涉及 OS)。

结论

2011 年至 2016 年期间,OS 的比率有所增加,但各纳入司法管辖区之间存在较大差异。我们的研究表明,许多纳入的司法管辖区都有增加 OS 比率的空间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c236/9177200/855ff8e5f249/cmajo.20210219f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c236/9177200/6c631d5b3213/cmajo.20210219f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c236/9177200/994b0baf129a/cmajo.20210219f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c236/9177200/46b3a16c927f/cmajo.20210219f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c236/9177200/855ff8e5f249/cmajo.20210219f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c236/9177200/6c631d5b3213/cmajo.20210219f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c236/9177200/994b0baf129a/cmajo.20210219f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c236/9177200/46b3a16c927f/cmajo.20210219f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c236/9177200/855ff8e5f249/cmajo.20210219f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis.2011 年至 2016 年期间的机会性输卵管切除术:描述性分析。
CMAJ Open. 2022 May 31;10(2):E466-E475. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210219. Print 2022 Apr-Jun.
2
Opportunistic Salpingectomy Between 2017 and 2020: A Descriptive Analysis.2017年至2020年期间的机会性输卵管切除术:描述性分析
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024 Apr;46(4):102278. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102278. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
3
Extending the safety evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy in prevention of ovarian cancer: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.延长机会性输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌的安全性证据:来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):172.e1-172.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 May 28.
4
The impact of opportunistic salpingectomy on ovarian cancer mortality and healthcare costs: a call for universal insurance coverage.预防性输卵管切除术对卵巢癌死亡率和医疗保健成本的影响:呼吁普遍保险覆盖。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):397.e1-397.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.032. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
5
Examining indicators of early menopause following opportunistic salpingectomy: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.探讨加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省机会性输卵管切除术(salpingectomy)后早绝经的指标:一项队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):221.e1-221.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
6
Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.剖宫产时行随机输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术的成本效益比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):106.e1-106.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
7
Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.机会性输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌的成本效益
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):373-379. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.034. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
8
Outcomes From Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention.机会性输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2147343. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47343.
9
No. 344-Opportunistic Salpingectomy and Other Methods of Risk Reduction for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal Cancer in the General Population.第344号——普通人群中卵巢/输卵管/腹膜癌的机会性输卵管切除术及其他降低风险方法。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Jun;39(6):480-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.12.005.
10
The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.美国预防性双侧输卵管切除术治疗卵巢癌的效果和安全性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;216(3):270.e1-270.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.035. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Ovarian Cancer: From Precursor Lesion Identification to Population-Based Prevention Programs.卵巢癌:从前期病变识别到基于人群的预防计划。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Nov 29;30(12):10179-10194. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30120741.
2
Beyond Sterilization: A Comprehensive Review on the Safety and Efficacy of Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Preventative Strategy for Ovarian Cancer.超越绝育:机会性输卵管切除术作为卵巢癌预防策略的安全性和有效性的全面综述。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Nov 28;30(12):10152-10165. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30120739.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' and professionals' perspectives on implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy: a mixed-method study.患者和专业人员对机会性输卵管切除术实施的看法:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 25;21(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06767-9.
2
Ovarian cancer population screening and mortality after long-term follow-up in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial.英国卵巢癌筛查协作试验(UKCTOCS)长期随访后的卵巢癌人群筛查和死亡率:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2182-2193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00731-5. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy or hydrosalpinx: results of the OCASE nationwide population-based database study.
输卵管妊娠或输卵管积水手术后的卵巢癌风险:OCASE 全国基于人群数据库研究的结果。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jan 1;36(1):211-218. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa264.
4
Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2020.2020 年加拿大癌症预估。
CMAJ. 2020 Mar 2;192(9):E199-E205. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.191292.
5
Salpingectomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.剖宫产术中行输卵管切除术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;135(3):550-557. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003673.
6
Examining indicators of early menopause following opportunistic salpingectomy: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.探讨加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省机会性输卵管切除术(salpingectomy)后早绝经的指标:一项队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):221.e1-221.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
7
Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone.全子宫切除术加选择性输卵管切除术与单纯全子宫切除术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 28;8(8):CD012858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012858.pub2.
8
Bilateral salpingectomy versus bilateral partial salpingectomy during cesarean delivery.剖宫产术中双侧输卵管切除术与双侧部分输卵管切除术的比较
Int J Womens Health. 2018 Oct 23;10:649-653. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S180329. eCollection 2018.
9
Menopausal symptoms and surgical complications after opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy, a register-based cohort study.绝经症状和机会性双侧输卵管切除术的手术并发症:一项基于登记的队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):85.e1-85.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
10
Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.对携带BRCA1或BRCA2基因突变的女性进行降低风险的双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 24;8(8):CD012464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012464.pub2.