• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型可移动经皮棘突间 spacer 置入后的临床和放射学结果:初步经验。

Clinical and radiological outcomes following insertion of a novel removable percutaneous interspinous process spacer: an initial experience.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nice University Hospital, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Nice, France.

South West London, Elective Orthopaedic Centre (SWLEOC), Epsom, KT18 7EG, London, UK.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2022 Sep;64(9):1887-1895. doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-02977-y. Epub 2022 May 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00234-022-02977-y
PMID:35641830
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of a series of patients treated with a removable percutaneous interspinous process spacer (IPS) (LobsterProject® Techlamed®) for symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS).

METHODS

All patients treated in two centres with this IPS during 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Procedures were performed under deep sedation or general anaesthesia by two interventional radiologists. Patients were clinically evaluated before intervention and at 3-month follow-up with Visual Analog Scales for pain (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and radiologically with MRI or CT scans. Neural foramina were independently measured for each patient on pre- and post-procedural CT scans by two radiologists.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were treated in the selected period of which fifty-eight had complete documentation (mean age 71.2 ± 9.2 years [55-92], 32 males, 26 females). Forty-eight interventions were performed under deep sedation and ten under general anaesthesia, without procedural complications. Clinical follow-up at 3 months showed a significant reduction of pain (VAS from 83 ± 9 to 29 ± 19, - 65%; p < 0.001) and an improvement in functional outcomes (ODI from 31 ± 12 to 13 ± 10%, - 58%; p < 0.001). There was one case of unsatisfactory positioning post procedure, two cases of posterior migration at 3-month follow-up and one case of spinous process fracture. Mean neural foramina area increased from 77 ± 23 to 95 ± 27 mm (+ 26%; p < 0.001) with very good inter-observer reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.899).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous minimally invasive insertion of a removable IPS device demonstrates a favourable safety profile, good clinical outcomes at 3 months, and apparent anatomical increase in foraminal dimensions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05203666-Release Date: 21 January 2022, retrospectively registered.

摘要

目的

评估一系列使用可移除经皮棘突间撑开器(LobsterProject®Techlamed®)治疗症状性退行性腰椎管狭窄症(DLSS)患者的临床和影像学结果。

方法

回顾性分析 2019 年在两个中心使用该 IPS 治疗的所有患者。由两位介入放射科医生在深度镇静或全身麻醉下进行手术。在干预前和 3 个月随访时,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)对患者进行临床评估,并通过 MRI 或 CT 扫描进行影像学评估。两位放射科医生分别对每位患者的术前和术后 CT 扫描进行神经孔独立测量。

结果

在选定期间,59 名患者接受了治疗,其中 58 名患者的资料完整(平均年龄 71.2±9.2 岁[55-92],男性 32 名,女性 26 名)。48 例手术在深度镇静下进行,10 例在全身麻醉下进行,无手术并发症。3 个月的临床随访显示疼痛明显减轻(VAS 从 83±9 降至 29±19,-65%;p<0.001),功能结果改善(ODI 从 31±12 降至 13±10%,-58%;p<0.001)。术后有 1 例定位不满意,3 个月时后有 2 例后移,1 例棘突骨折。神经孔面积平均从 77±23 增加到 95±27mm(+26%;p<0.001),观察者间可靠性非常好(Cronbach's alpha=0.899)。

结论

经皮微创植入可移除 IPS 装置具有良好的安全性,3 个月时临床疗效良好,椎间孔尺寸明显增加。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT05203666-发布日期:2022 年 1 月 21 日,回顾性注册。

相似文献

1
Clinical and radiological outcomes following insertion of a novel removable percutaneous interspinous process spacer: an initial experience.新型可移动经皮棘突间 spacer 置入后的临床和放射学结果:初步经验。
Neuroradiology. 2022 Sep;64(9):1887-1895. doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-02977-y. Epub 2022 May 31.
2
Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗选择
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD012421. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012421.
3
[Early effectiveness of posterior 180-degree decompression via unilateral biportal endoscopy in treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis combined with MSU-1 lumbar disc herniation].[经单侧双通道内镜下后路180°减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症合并MSU-1型腰椎间盘突出症的早期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 15;39(6):735-740. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202504083.
4
Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 29;2016(1):CD010264. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010264.pub2.
5
Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.棘突间装置在老年腰椎退变患者中是否安全有效?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08119-z. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
6
Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.与传统椎板切除术相比,后路减压技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 11;2015(3):CD010036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010036.pub2.
7
Interventions for treating fractures of the patella in adults.成人髌骨骨折的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 27(2):CD009651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009651.pub2.
8
Clinical Importance of Redundant Nerve Roots in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Secondary Analysis of NORDSTEN Spinal Stenosis Trial Data.症状性腰椎管狭窄症患者中神经根冗余的临床重要性:NORDSTEN腰椎管狭窄症试验数据的二次分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jul 15;50(14):941-947. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005160. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
9
Rehabilitation following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症手术后的康复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 9;2013(12):CD009644. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009644.pub2.
10
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes and muscle injury in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing arthroscopic-assisted uni-portal spinal surgery, unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery, and percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomy: a six-month follow-up.关节镜辅助单通道脊柱手术、单侧双通道内镜手术和经皮椎间孔腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的短期临床疗效及肌肉损伤比较:六个月随访
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 21;20(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06088-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a new percutaneous interspinous device: a retrospective multicenter study.新型经皮棘突间装置的可行性、安全性和有效性:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Neuroradiology. 2024 Jun;66(6):1049-1056. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03343-w. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
Percutaneous removal and replacement of a novel percutaneous interspinous device.经皮取出并更换一种新型经皮棘突间装置。
Neuroradiol J. 2024 Oct;37(5):645-648. doi: 10.1177/19714009231212366. Epub 2023 Nov 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Successful use of percutaneous interspinous spacers and adjunctive spinoplasty in a 9 year cohort of patients.经皮棘突间撑开器和辅助脊柱成形术在 9 年患者队列中的成功应用。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jul;12(7):673-677. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015601. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
2
Neurogenic Claudication: a Review of Current Understanding and Treatment Options.神经源性跛行:当前认识和治疗选择的综述。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Mar 19;23(5):32. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0769-x.
3
Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer vs Decompression in Patients with Neurogenic Claudication: An Alternative in Selected Patients?
经皮棘突间撑开器与减压术治疗神经性跛行患者:对特定患者的一种替代选择?
Neurosurgery. 2018 May 1;82(5):621-629. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx326.
4
Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的治疗
BMJ. 2016 Jan 4;352:h6234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6234.
5
Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study.棘突间减压装置的失败率和并发症:一项欧洲多中心研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E14. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15244.
6
Midterm Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes after Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer Treatment for Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication.经皮棘突间间隔器治疗神经源性间歇性跛行的中期临床和影像学结果
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Nov;26(11):1687-93.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
7
Efficacy of epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis: a systematic review.硬膜外注射治疗腰椎中央管狭窄症的疗效:一项系统评价
Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Feb 1;5(1):e23139. doi: 10.5812/aapm.23139. eCollection 2015 Feb.
8
IPD without bony decompression versus conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.腰椎管狭窄症的非骨性减压与传统手术减压的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验的2年结果
Eur Spine J. 2015 Oct;24(10):2295-305. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3748-2. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
9
Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.腰椎管狭窄症中微创减压术与X-stop植入术的对比:一项随机对照多中心研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 15;40(2):77-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000691.
10
X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.X 型截骨术与减压手术治疗腰椎源性神经间歇性跛行的随机对照试验:2 年随访。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Aug 1;38(17):1436-42. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828ba413.