• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型经皮棘突间装置的可行性、安全性和有效性:一项回顾性多中心研究。

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a new percutaneous interspinous device: a retrospective multicenter study.

机构信息

UOC Radiologia SS, Trinità Hospital, 09121, Cagliari, Italy.

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2024 Jun;66(6):1049-1056. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03343-w. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00234-024-03343-w
PMID:38568239
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety and efficacy of the novel percutaneous interspinous device (PID) for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) in 3 different centers.

METHODS

From November 2016 to March 2020, 255 patients (male 125, mean age 71.2 years old range 49-91 years old) with neurogenic claudication, confirmed by electromyography, related to mono or bi-segmental lumbar central canal and/or foraminal stenosis were enrolled in the study. Magnetic resonance (MR) and/or computer tomography (CT), physical exam, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) were performed before and 6 months after the procedure. All treatments were performed under fluoroscopic guidance with local anesthesia and mild sedation. Technical success was defined as correct placement of the Lobster® (Demetrios Medical, Firenze, Italy) PID as demonstrated by computer tomography (CT) performed immediately after treatment; spinoplasty was performed in selected patients.

RESULTS

PID placement was accomplished with a 99.6% success rate (257/258). The one device that was not implanted was due to a spinous process fracture. In 28 patients, more than 1 device was implanted in the same session (max 3 PIDs); 6 patients required a second implant in different session. A total of 172 prophylactic spinoplasties were performed (59.3%). No major complications occurred; 3 device misplacements were successfully treated with percutaneous retrieval and new device deployment. 99.6% of patients experienced clinical improvement.

CONCLUSION

Lobster PID is an effective and safe minimally invasive decompression method for central canal and neural foraminal stenosis when patients are correctly selected.

摘要

目的

在 3 家不同中心评估新型经皮棘突间装置(PID)治疗症状性退行性腰椎管狭窄症(DLSS)的安全性和有效性。

方法

2016 年 11 月至 2020 年 3 月,255 名(男 125 名,平均年龄 71.2 岁,年龄 49-91 岁)患者因单节段或双节段腰椎中央管和/或神经孔狭窄导致神经源性跛行,经肌电图证实,进行了这项研究。所有患者在术前和术后 6 个月进行磁共振成像(MR)和/或计算机断层扫描(CT)、体格检查以及视觉模拟量表(VAS)和苏黎世跛行问卷(ZCQ)。所有治疗均在局部麻醉和轻度镇静下在透视引导下进行。将 Lobster®(意大利佛罗伦萨的 Demetrios Medical)PID 正确放置定义为治疗后立即进行 CT 检查时的技术成功;在选择的患者中进行了 spinoplasty。

结果

PID 放置成功率为 99.6%(257/258)。有 1 个装置未植入,原因是棘突骨折。在 28 名患者中,在同一时段植入了 1 个以上的装置(最多 3 个 PID);6 名患者需要在不同时段进行第二次植入。共进行了 172 例预防性 spinoplasty(59.3%)。无重大并发症发生;3 例装置错位经皮取出和新装置植入成功治疗。99.6%的患者临床症状改善。

结论

在正确选择患者的情况下,Lobster PID 是一种有效且安全的微创中央管和神经孔狭窄减压方法。

相似文献

1
Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a new percutaneous interspinous device: a retrospective multicenter study.新型经皮棘突间装置的可行性、安全性和有效性:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Neuroradiology. 2024 Jun;66(6):1049-1056. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03343-w. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
Successful use of percutaneous interspinous spacers and adjunctive spinoplasty in a 9 year cohort of patients.经皮棘突间撑开器和辅助脊柱成形术在 9 年患者队列中的成功应用。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jul;12(7):673-677. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015601. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
3
Percutaneous decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis with a new interspinous device.经皮腰椎管狭窄减压术与新型棘突间装置。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Apr;35(2):368-74. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0167-1. Epub 2011 May 28.
4
Clinical and radiological outcomes following insertion of a novel removable percutaneous interspinous process spacer: an initial experience.新型可移动经皮棘突间 spacer 置入后的临床和放射学结果:初步经验。
Neuroradiology. 2022 Sep;64(9):1887-1895. doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-02977-y. Epub 2022 May 31.
5
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication: 2-Year Results of MiDAS ENCORE.微创腰椎减压术治疗伴有神经源性跛行的腰椎狭窄症的长期安全性和疗效:MiDAS ENCORE 的 2 年结果。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;43(7):789-794. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000868.
6
Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis.175例因腰椎管狭窄导致神经源性间歇性跛行患者行棘突间撑开器(X-Stop)植入术的两年结果。
Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):823-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0967-z. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
7
Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS(®) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication.APERIUS(®)微创棘突间装置治疗伴有症状性神经源性间歇性跛行的退变性腰椎管狭窄症的初步安全性和有效性的临床评估。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Dec;21(12):2565-72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2330-z. Epub 2012 May 8.
8
Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.经皮棘突间撑开器植入术与开放式减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Spine J. 2011 Oct;11(10):933-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.419.
9
Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up.用于腰椎管狭窄症和退行性椎间盘疾病的棘突间撑开减压术(X-STOP):一项至少随访3年的多中心研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;124:166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
10
Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial.棘突间装置与标准常规手术减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2013 Nov 14;347:f6415. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6415.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical and radiological outcomes following insertion of a novel removable percutaneous interspinous process spacer: an initial experience.新型可移动经皮棘突间 spacer 置入后的临床和放射学结果:初步经验。
Neuroradiology. 2022 Sep;64(9):1887-1895. doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-02977-y. Epub 2022 May 31.
2
Which is the most effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompression, fusion, or interspinous process device? A Bayesian network meta-analysis.腰椎管狭窄症最有效的治疗方法是什么:减压、融合还是棘突间装置?一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
J Orthop Translat. 2020 Sep 26;26:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.07.003. eCollection 2021 Jan.
3
Successful use of percutaneous interspinous spacers and adjunctive spinoplasty in a 9 year cohort of patients.
经皮棘突间撑开器和辅助脊柱成形术在 9 年患者队列中的成功应用。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jul;12(7):673-677. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015601. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
4
Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer in Spinal-Canal-Stenosis Treatment: Pros and Cons.经皮棘突间撑开器治疗椎管狭窄症:利弊分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Jul 16;55(7):381. doi: 10.3390/medicina55070381.
5
Interspinous process devices for treatment of degenerative lumbar spine stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.棘突间装置治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0199623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199623. eCollection 2018.
6
Cirse Quality Assurance Document and Standards for Classification of Complications: The Cirse Classification System.Cirse并发症分类的质量保证文件和标准:Cirse分类系统。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):1141-1146. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1703-4. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
7
Biomechanical study of dynamic changes in L4-L5 foramen surface area in flexion and extension after implantation of four interspinous process devices.四种棘突间装置植入后L4-L5椎间孔表面积在屈伸运动时动态变化的生物力学研究
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Apr;101(2):215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.11.016. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
8
IPD without bony decompression versus conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.腰椎管狭窄症的非骨性减压与传统手术减压的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验的2年结果
Eur Spine J. 2015 Oct;24(10):2295-305. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3748-2. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
9
Posterior Arch Augmentation (Spinoplasty) before and after Single and Double Interspinous Spacer Introduction at the Same Level: Preventing and Treating the Failure?同一节段单双节段棘突间撑开器置入前后的后弓增强术(椎板成形术):预防和治疗失败?
Interv Neuroradiol. 2014 Oct 31;20(5):626-31. doi: 10.15274/INR-2014-10052. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
10
The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study.全球腰痛负担:来自 2010 年全球疾病负担研究的估计。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. Epub 2014 Mar 24.