Developmental Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Mem Cognit. 2023 Jan;51(1):23-37. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01312-3. Epub 2022 May 31.
It is generally accepted that autobiographical memories (AMs) are organised in associative networks. While both thematic and temporal similarity have been examined as connections among AMs, in the present study we focused on both the positive and negative emotional intensity of events as a possible link among AMs. To do so, we investigated whether the output order with which AMs elicited by cue words were reported can be accounted for emotional intensity of adjacent AMs. Data come from 94 older adults (M [Formula: see text] 67.14; SD [Formula: see text] 6.17) who reported 30 AMs in response to neutral cue words. Positive and negative emotional intensity of AMs were assessed on two separate scales (happiness and sadness). The output order was modeled based on a dual mixed-effects autoregressive model, where the strength of the autoregressive effect indicates how much the emotional intensity of an AM can be predicted by the emotional intensity of the previously reported AM. Results show that there were significant autoregressive effects for both the happiness and sadness ratings (accounting for 4% of variance). We also observed cross-over effects, such that the happiness rating of an AM was predicted by the sadness rating of the previously reported AM (and vice versa). Moreover, we found individual differences in the strength of the autoregressive effects. For the sadness ratings, these individual differences tended to be related to the participant's mood state, particularly so during the first output positions. Together, these findings demonstrate that there is a substantive effect of emotional intensity on the output order with which AMs are reported-even when elicited by cue words. Based on the premise that the output order of AMs informs about the organisation of autobiographical memory, our results highlight the role of emotional associations among AMs in old age.
人们普遍认为自传体记忆(AMs)是组织在联想网络中的。虽然主题和时间相似性已被作为 AMs 之间的联系进行了研究,但在本研究中,我们专注于事件的积极和消极情绪强度作为 AMs 之间的可能联系。为此,我们调查了通过提示词引发的 AMs 的报告输出顺序是否可以解释相邻 AMs 的情绪强度。数据来自 94 名老年人(M [公式:见文本] 67.14;SD [公式:见文本] 6.17),他们用中性提示词报告了 30 个 AMs。通过两个单独的量表(幸福和悲伤)评估 AMs 的积极和消极情绪强度。输出顺序是基于双混合效应自回归模型建模的,其中自回归效应的强度表示 AM 的情绪强度可以通过之前报告的 AM 的情绪强度来预测多少。结果表明,幸福和悲伤评分都存在显著的自回归效应(占方差的 4%)。我们还观察到交叉效应,即 AM 的幸福感评分可以由之前报告的 AM 的悲伤评分预测(反之亦然)。此外,我们发现自回归效应的个体差异。对于悲伤评分,这些个体差异往往与参与者的情绪状态有关,尤其是在第一个输出位置。总之,这些发现表明,情绪强度对 AMs 报告的输出顺序有实质性影响,即使是通过提示词引发的。基于 AMs 的输出顺序提供自传体记忆组织信息的前提,我们的结果强调了 AMs 之间情绪联系在老年中的作用。