Department of Developmental Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Memory. 2021 Mar;29(3):379-395. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1896735. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
Investigating the recall process of autobiographical memories (AMs) and, particularly, the order in which AMs are recalled has the potential to shed light on the organisation of autobiographical memory. However, research on order effects in the recall of AMs is relatively rare. Moreover, to date, no study addressed the question of where emotion fits into the organisation. The present study aimed to close this gap by examining whether emotional valence serves as one organising principle. Data come from 117 older adults ( = 74.11; SD = 7.06) who reported up to 39 AMs. The use of a multivariate multilevel model with autoregressive effects allows us to analyse the order effect within one person, as well as how the order effect differs between persons. The results replicated a temporal first-order effect that has been shown in previous studies and moreover, demonstrated a temporal second-order effect. Furthermore, our results indicated an emotional first-order effect that was even stronger than the temporal first-order effect and an emotional second-order effect. In addition, both first-order effects differed reliably between persons. Thus, the present study emphasises the need for considering emotion in current theoretical formulations of autobiographical memory and also of considering individual differences in the order of AMs recalled.
研究自传体记忆(AMs)的回忆过程,特别是回忆 AMs 的顺序,有可能揭示自传体记忆的组织方式。然而,关于 AMs 回忆中的顺序效应的研究相对较少。此外,迄今为止,尚无研究探讨情绪在组织中的位置。本研究旨在通过考察情绪效价是否作为一个组织原则来填补这一空白。数据来自 117 名老年人( = 74.11;SD = 7.06),他们报告了多达 39 个 AMs。使用具有自回归效应的多变量多层模型,我们可以分析一个人内的顺序效应,以及该顺序效应在人与人之间的差异。结果复制了先前研究中已经显示的时间一阶效应,并且还证明了时间二阶效应。此外,我们的结果表明存在情绪一阶效应,其强度甚至超过了时间一阶效应和情绪二阶效应。此外,两种一阶效应在人与人之间存在可靠差异。因此,本研究强调了在自传体记忆的当前理论公式中考虑情绪的必要性,以及在回忆 AMs 的顺序中考虑个体差异的必要性。