• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种儿童用旋转锉根管预备后对主根管弯曲度及牙本质损耗的锥形束 CT 分析

Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of primary root canals transportation and dentin loss after instrumentation with two-pediatric rotary files.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2022 May 31;22(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02245-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-022-02245-8
PMID:35641977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9153195/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This in vitro study aims to compare rotary files (Fanta and Zuanba) with manual K files according to the amount of dentin removed and canal transportation in primary mandibular second molars by CBCT images.

METHODS

This experimental study was conducted on 60 extracted human second primary molars. That were divided into three groups according to root canal preparation group "I" instrumented with manual K-files, group "II" instrumented with rotary Fanta files, and group "III" instrumented with rotary Zuanba files. After root canal preparation, teeth were scanned before and after mechanical preparation with CBCT scanner. Then the amount of dentin removed was determined at three levels, including the coronal, middle and apical levels. Data were statically analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULT

No statistically significant difference in the amount of dentin removed were noted between the manual and the rotary groups at the coronal and apical RC levels (P = 0.420) and (P = 0.819) respectively but significant difference was noted at the middle third (P = 0.043). Regarding RC transportation, no significant difference was noted among the three groups with the exception of the apical RC level (P = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Although no significant differences were noted between rotary and manual files, the rotary files showed better performance.

摘要

背景

本体外研究旨在通过 CBCT 图像比较手动 K 锉和 Fanta、Zuanba 机用镍钛锉预备下颌第二乳磨牙根管时的根管预备后牙本质去除量和根管偏移。

方法

本实验研究纳入 60 颗拔除的人第二乳磨牙,根据根管预备方法分为三组:“I”组手动 K 锉预备,“II”组 Fanta 机用镍钛锉预备,“III”组 Zuanba 机用镍钛锉预备。根管预备后,使用 CBCT 扫描机在机械预备前后对牙齿进行扫描。然后在三个水平(冠方、中间和根尖)确定牙本质去除量。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验对数据进行统计学分析。

结果

在根管冠方和根尖预备水平(RC),手动组和旋转组在牙本质去除量方面无统计学差异(P=0.420)和(P=0.819),但在根管中间段有统计学差异(P=0.043)。关于 RC 偏移,除根尖 RC 水平外(P=0.043),三组间无统计学差异。

结论

尽管手动和旋转锉之间没有显著差异,但旋转锉的表现更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4ca/9153195/33aed15c26b7/12903_2022_2245_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4ca/9153195/4463bdd8edc0/12903_2022_2245_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4ca/9153195/184c45b84aa0/12903_2022_2245_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4ca/9153195/33aed15c26b7/12903_2022_2245_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4ca/9153195/4463bdd8edc0/12903_2022_2245_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4ca/9153195/184c45b84aa0/12903_2022_2245_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4ca/9153195/33aed15c26b7/12903_2022_2245_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of primary root canals transportation and dentin loss after instrumentation with two-pediatric rotary files.两种儿童用旋转锉根管预备后对主根管弯曲度及牙本质损耗的锥形束 CT 分析
BMC Oral Health. 2022 May 31;22(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02245-8.
2
Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of shaping ability of kedo-S square and fanta AF™ baby rotary files compared to manual K-files in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth.使用 Cone-beam computed tomography 评估在儿童前牙根管预备中,kedo-S square 和 fanta AF™ baby 旋转锉与手动 K 锉相比的成形能力。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 May 27;28(6):340. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05726-y.
3
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Rotary MM Files vs Manual K Files in Primary Molars: An Study.一次性根管锉( Rotary MM 锉)与手动根管锉(K 锉)在儿童磨牙根管预备中的锥形束 CT 评价:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023 May 1;24(5):285-295. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3513.
4
Comparison of two pediatric rotary file systems and hand instrumentation in primary molar: An ex vivo cone-beam computed tomographic study.两种儿童旋转锉系统与手动器械在乳磨牙根管治疗中应用的比较:一项离体锥形束 CT 研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;24(10):1492-1498. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_563_20.
5
Evaluation of rotary file system (Kedo-S-Square) in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-in vitro study.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估恒牙前牙根管预备的旋转锉系统(Kedo-S-Square):体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jan 18;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-02021-0.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对乳牙中手用K锉、ProTaper旋转锉和Kedo S旋转锉进行根管预备时的牙本质去除和锥度的比较评估。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):332-336. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787.
7
Comparative assessment of dentin removal following hand and rotary instrumentation in primary molars using cone-beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对乳牙进行手动和旋转器械预备后牙本质去除情况的比较评估。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Jan-Mar;37(1):80-86. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_210_18.
8
Evaluation of centralization ability and canal transportation of root canals prepared with three commercially available pediatric rotary files.评价三种市售儿童用机用镍钛锉根管预备的根管偏移能力和根管输送性能。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2022 Oct-Dec;40(4):391-397. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_380_22.
9
Comparing the amount of removed dentin thickness in root canal treated primary molar teeth using different instrumentation techniques: in-vitro study using CBCT.比较不同根管预备技术在乳牙根管治疗中去除牙本质厚度的比较:CBCT 体外研究。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022 Apr;23(2):255-260. doi: 10.1007/s40368-021-00662-x. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
10
Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT.使用CBCT在体外评估旋转锉与手动锉在乳牙根管预备中的疗效。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014 Apr;15(2):113-20. doi: 10.1007/s40368-013-0072-1. Epub 2013 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Hand Files, Mtwo, Reciproc, and Gentlefile Rotary Systems Regarding Canal Transportation, Centering Ability, and Obturation Quality of Primary Molars.手用锉、Mtwo、Reciproc和Gentlefile旋转系统在乳牙根管偏移、定心能力和充填质量方面的比较
J Dent (Shiraz). 2025 Mar 1;26(1):76-87. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2024.100763.2247. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of shaping ability of kedo-S square and fanta AF™ baby rotary files compared to manual K-files in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth.使用 Cone-beam computed tomography 评估在儿童前牙根管预备中,kedo-S square 和 fanta AF™ baby 旋转锉与手动 K 锉相比的成形能力。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 May 27;28(6):340. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05726-y.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative pain after primary molar pulpectomy using rotary or reciprocating single files: A superior, parallel, randomized clinical trial.一次性使用旋转或往复式根管锉行乳磨牙牙髓切除术的术后疼痛:一项优等、平行、随机临床试验。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022 Nov;32(6):819-827. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12959. Epub 2022 May 5.
2
Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Dentin Removal Capacity of Two NiTi Endodontic Reciprocating Systems for the Root Canal Treatment of Primary Molar Teeth. An In Vitro Study.两种用于乳牙根管治疗的镍钛根管往复系统根管牙本质去除能力的比较分析。一项体外研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 11;11(2):338. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020338.
3
Assessment of clinical and radiographic efficiency of manual and pediatric rotary file systems in primary root canal preparation: a randomized controlled clinical trial.评价手动和儿童机用旋转锉系统在儿童乳牙根管预备中的临床和影像学效果:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 23;23(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03393-1.
Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对乳牙中手用K锉、ProTaper旋转锉和Kedo S旋转锉进行根管预备时的牙本质去除和锥度的比较评估。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):332-336. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787.
4
Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of ProGlider and WaveOne Gold Glider in Curved Canals.ProGlider与WaveOne Gold Glider在弯曲根管中的根管偏移及就位能力比较
Eur J Dent. 2020 Oct;14(4):639-643. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715780. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
5
Rotary Endodontics in Pediatric Dentistry: Embracing the New Alternative.儿童牙科中的旋转根管治疗:采用新的替代方法。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):460-463. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1679.
6
Allium sativum extract as an irrigant in pulpectomy of primary molars: A 12-month short-term evaluation.大蒜提取物作为乳牙牙髓摘除术中的冲洗剂:一项为期12个月的短期评估。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019 Jun 26;5(4):420-426. doi: 10.1002/cre2.197. eCollection 2019 Aug.
7
The Clinical Effectiveness of Calcium Hydroxide in Root Canal Disinfection of Primary Teeth: A Meta-Analysis.氢氧化钙在儿童乳牙根管消毒中的临床效果:一项荟萃分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Apr 20;25:2908-2916. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913256.
8
Comparative evaluation of instrumentation timing and cleaning efficacy in extracted primary molars using manual and NiTi rotary technique - Invitro study.使用手动和镍钛旋转技术对拔除的乳磨牙进行器械操作时机和清洁效果的比较评估——体外研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;9(2):151-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
9
Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Single-file Systems.单文件系统根管输送和中心定位能力的锥形束 CT 分析。
J Endod. 2018 Dec;44(12):1788-1791. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
10
Evaluation of the Effect of Different Root Canal Preparation Techniques in Primary Teeth Using CBCT.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估不同根管预备技术对乳牙的影响。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;42(4):250-255. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-42.4.2. Epub 2018 May 11.