Sadeq Adel, Elnour Asim Ahmed, Farah Farah Hamad, Ramadan Azza, Baraka Mohamed A, Don Judit, Amoodi Abdulla Al, Sam Kishore Gnana, Mazrouei Nadia Al, Alkaabi Maisoun
Program of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Al Ain, UAE.
Program of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi campus, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Curr Rev Clin Exp Pharmacol. 2023;18(2):120-147. doi: 10.2174/2772432817666220531115314.
A subpopulation of statin users such as subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD), Human Immune virus (HIV), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), revascularization, metabolic syndrome, and/or diabetes may particularly benefit from pitavastatin pharmacotherapy.
The current systematic review aimed systematically to evaluate the effect of pitavastatin on primary cardiac events in subjects receiving pitavastatin in comparison to the other four statin members.
We conducted a systematic review on phases III and IV of randomized controlled trials (RCT-s, 11 trials) for subjects with primary cardiac events who received pitavastatin. Subjects diagnosed with any type of dyslipidemia (population 4804) and received pitavastatin (interventions) versus comparator (comparison) with the primary efficacy endpoint of minimization of LDL-C and non- HDL-C, had an increase in HDL-C and/or reduction in major adverse cardiac events (MACE, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (fatal/nonfatal), and stroke (fatal/nonfatal) and/or their composite (outcomes). The secondary safety endpoint was the development of any adverse effects.
In the included trials (11), participants (4804) were randomized for pitavastatin or its comparators such as atorvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin and followed up for 12 to 52 weeks. In terms of the primary outcome (reduction in LDL-C), pitavastatin 4 mg was superior to pravastatin 40 mg in three trials, while the 2 mg pitavastatin was comparable to atorvastatin 10 mg in four trials and simvastatin 20 and 40 mg in two 2 trials. However, rosuvastatin 2.5 mg was superior to pitavastatin 2 mg in two trials. Pitavastatin increased HDL-C and reduced non-HDL-C in eleven trials. Regarding the safety profile, pitavastatin has proved to be tolerated and safe.
The FDA-approved indications for pitavastatin included primary dyslipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia as a supplementary therapy to dietary changes to lower total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein B (Apo B), triglycerides (TG), and enhance HDL-C. Pitavastatin might be suitable for subjects with diabetes, ACS (reduced revascularization), metabolic syndrome, CKD, HIV, and subjects with low levels of HDL-C. We highly recommend rational individualization for the selection of statin.
他汀类药物使用者中的一个亚群体,如患有慢性肾脏病(CKD)、人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)、急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)、血管重建、代谢综合征和/或糖尿病的患者,可能特别受益于匹伐他汀药物治疗。
本系统评价旨在系统评估匹伐他汀与其他四种他汀类药物相比,对接受匹伐他汀治疗的患者发生主要心脏事件的影响。
我们对接受匹伐他汀治疗的原发性心脏事件患者的随机对照试验(RCT,11项试验)的III期和IV期进行了系统评价。诊断为任何类型血脂异常的患者(共4804人)接受匹伐他汀(干预措施)与对照药物(对照)治疗,主要疗效终点为使低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-C)降至最低、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)升高和/或主要不良心脏事件(MACE,包括心血管死亡、心肌梗死(致命/非致命)和中风(致命/非致命))及其复合事件(结局)减少。次要安全性终点为任何不良反应的发生情况。
在纳入的试验(11项)中,参与者(4804人)被随机分配接受匹伐他汀或其对照药物,如阿托伐他汀、普伐他汀、瑞舒伐他汀、辛伐他汀,并随访12至52周。在主要结局(降低LDL-C)方面,4项试验中匹伐他汀4mg优于普伐他汀40mg,4项试验中匹伐他汀2mg与阿托伐他汀10mg相当,2项试验中匹伐他汀2mg与辛伐他汀20mg和40mg相当。然而在2项试验中,瑞舒伐他汀2.5mg优于匹伐他汀2mg。11项试验中匹伐他汀均使HDL-C升高且使non-HDL-C降低。在安全性方面,匹伐他汀已被证明耐受性良好且安全。
美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的匹伐他汀适应症包括原发性血脂异常和混合性血脂异常,作为饮食调整的补充疗法以降低总胆固醇、LDL-C、载脂蛋白B(Apo B)、甘油三酯(TG),并提高HDL-C。匹伐他汀可能适用于糖尿病患者、ACS患者(减少血管重建)、代谢综合征患者、CKD患者、HIV患者以及HDL-C水平较低的患者。我们强烈建议他汀类药物的选择要合理个体化。