Sponseller Craig A, Morgan Roger E, Kryzhanovski Vladimir A, Campbell Stuart E, Davidson Michael H
Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc, Montgomery, Alabama.
Kowa Research Institute, Inc, Morrisville, North Carolina.
Clin Ther. 2014 Aug 1;36(8):1211-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
Results from a Phase III, European, non-inferiority trial in elderly (age ≥65 years) patients with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed (combined) dyslipidemia demonstrated significantly greater reductions in LDL-C for pitavastatin versus pravastatin across 3 pair-wise dose comparisons (1 mg vs 10 mg, 2 mg vs 20 mg, and 4 mg vs 40 mg, respectively). The present study investigated whether pitavastatin 4 mg is superior to pravastatin 40 mg in LDL-C reduction in adults (18-80 years old) with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed (combined) dyslipidemia.
This was a Phase IV, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control superiority study conducted in the United States. Patients with baseline LDL-C levels of 130 to 220 mg/dL (inclusive) and triglyceride levels ≤400 mg/dL after a 6-week washout/dietary stabilization period were randomized to 12 weeks of once-daily treatment with either pitavastatin 4 mg or pravastatin 40 mg.
A total of 328 subjects (164 per treatment arm) were randomized (mean age, 57.9 years [76% were aged <65 years]; 49.4% women; mean body mass index, 30.2 kg/m(2)) to treatment. The median percent change in LDL-C from baseline to the week 12 endpoint was -38.1% for pitavastatin 4 mg and -26.4% for pravastatin 40 mg; the difference in median percent change between treatments was -12.5% (P < 0.001). Differences between treatments in median percent reductions from baseline for apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol, and non-HDL-C were also significant in favor of pitavastatin (P < 0.001). Both treatments significantly (P < 0.001) increased HDL-C and decreased triglycerides, but the differences between treatments were not statistically significant. The overall rate of treatment-emergent adverse events was 47.6% (78 of 164) for pitavastatin and 44.5% (73 of 164) for pravastatin. Myalgia was reported by 3 patients (1.8%) in the pitavastatin group and by 4 patients (2.4%) in the pravastatin group. There were no reports of myositis or rhabdomyolysis.
Pitavastatin 4 mg demonstrated superior LDL-C reductions compared with pravastatin 40 mg after 12 weeks of therapy in adults with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed (combined) dyslipidemia. There were no new safety findings in the trial. Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT01256476.
一项针对老年(年龄≥65岁)原发性高脂血症或混合性(联合性)血脂异常患者的欧洲III期非劣效性试验结果表明,在3组两两剂量比较(分别为1毫克对10毫克、2毫克对20毫克以及4毫克对40毫克)中,匹伐他汀降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的幅度显著大于普伐他汀。本研究调查了在原发性高脂血症或混合性(联合性)血脂异常的成人(18 - 80岁)中,4毫克匹伐他汀在降低LDL-C方面是否优于40毫克普伐他汀。
这是一项在美国进行的IV期、多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟、活性对照优效性研究。在经过6周的洗脱/饮食稳定期后,基线LDL-C水平为130至220毫克/分升(含)且甘油三酯水平≤400毫克/分升的患者被随机分配,接受为期12周的每日一次治疗,分别使用4毫克匹伐他汀或40毫克普伐他汀。
共有328名受试者(每个治疗组164名)被随机分组(平均年龄57.9岁[76%年龄<65岁];49.4%为女性;平均体重指数30.2千克/米²)接受治疗。从基线到第12周终点,4毫克匹伐他汀组LDL-C的中位百分比变化为 - 38.1%,40毫克普伐他汀组为 - 26.4%;治疗组之间中位百分比变化的差异为 - 12.5%(P < 0.001)。治疗组之间在载脂蛋白B、总胆固醇和非HDL-C从基线降低的中位百分比差异也显著有利于匹伐他汀(P < 0.001)。两种治疗均显著(P < 0.001)升高了HDL-C并降低了甘油三酯,但治疗组之间的差异无统计学意义。匹伐他汀治疗出现不良事件的总发生率为47.6%(164例中的78例),普伐他汀为44.5%(164例中的73例)。匹伐他汀组有3名患者(1.8%)报告有肌痛,普伐他汀组有4名患者(2.4%)报告有肌痛。没有关于肌炎或横纹肌溶解的报告。
在原发性高脂血症或混合性(联合性)血脂异常的成人中,经过12周治疗后,4毫克匹伐他汀在降低LDL-C方面表现出优于40毫克普伐他汀的效果。该试验没有新的安全性发现。临床试验.gov标识符:NCT01256476。