Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Discipline of Physiotherapy, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, School of Health Sciences, The Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Eur J Pain. 2022 Sep;26(8):1636-1649. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1987. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
Analgesics are the most common form of managing low back pain (LBP). No previous study has examined which domains and intensities of physical activity are most beneficial in reducing the frequency of analgesic use for LBP and its related activity limitation.
This cohort study forms part of the AUstralian Twin low BACK pain study, investigating the impact of physical activity on LBP. Information on demographics, LBP and health-related factors, including physical activity, were collected at baseline. Data on the total counts of analgesic use and activity limitation for LBP were collected weekly for one-year. Negative binomial regression models were conducted separately for each type of physical activity. Results were presented as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
From an initial sample of 366 participants, 86 participants reported counts of analgesic use and 140 recorded counts of activity limitation across the follow-up period. The negative binomial regression models for analgesic use counts indicated that engagement in moderate-vigorous physical activity was protective for use of analgesics (IRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99), while physical workload was associated with greater use (IRR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.05). No other significant relationships were observed for the other measures of physical activity. For activity limitation counts, engagement in leisure activity was associated with less counts of activity limitation (IRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.81-0.99), while greater amounts of sedentary time was associated with higher counts (IRR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.09). No other significant relationships were observed for the other measures of physical activity.
Our findings highlight the potential importance of supporting engagement in moderate-vigorous and leisure physical activity as well as minimizing sedentary time and physical workload to reduce the risk of activity limitation and the need for analgesic use in people with LBP.
We examined which domains and intensities of physical activity are most beneficial in reducing the frequency of analgesic use for low back pain and its related activity limitation. Engaging in moderate-vigorous and leisure physical activity as well as minimizing sedentary time and physical workload has the potential to reduce the risk of activity limitation and the need for analgesic use in people with low back pain.
止痛药是治疗下背痛 (LBP) 的最常见形式。以前没有研究检查过哪种身体活动的领域和强度最有益于减少 LBP 的止痛药使用频率及其相关的活动受限。
这项队列研究是澳大利亚双胞胎腰痛研究的一部分,研究身体活动对 LBP 的影响。在基线时收集了人口统计学、LBP 和与健康相关的因素(包括身体活动)信息。每周收集一年的止痛药使用总计数和 LBP 相关活动受限的数据。分别对每种类型的身体活动进行负二项回归模型分析。结果以发病率比 (IRR) 和 95%置信区间 (CI) 表示。
从最初的 366 名参与者中,有 86 名报告了止痛药使用计数,有 140 名记录了 LBP 相关活动受限计数。止痛药使用计数的负二项回归模型表明,从事中等至剧烈强度的身体活动对止痛药的使用具有保护作用 (IRR 0.97,95%CI 0.96-0.99),而体力工作负荷与更大的使用量相关 (IRR 1.02,95%CI 1.01-1.05)。对于其他身体活动测量指标,没有观察到其他显著关系。对于活动受限计数,从事休闲活动与活动受限计数减少相关 (IRR 0.94,95%CI 0.81-0.99),而久坐时间增加与更高的计数相关 (IRR 1.04,95%CI 1.01-1.09)。对于其他身体活动测量指标,没有观察到其他显著关系。
我们的研究结果强调了支持从事中等至剧烈和休闲身体活动以及尽量减少久坐时间和体力工作负荷以降低 LBP 相关活动受限和止痛药使用风险的重要性。
我们检查了哪种身体活动领域和强度最有益于减少 LBP 的止痛药使用频率及其相关的活动受限。从事中等至剧烈和休闲身体活动以及尽量减少久坐时间和体力工作负荷有可能降低 LBP 患者的活动受限和止痛药使用的风险。